Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -38.56% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -23%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 25th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 42.8 | 49.4 | — | 42.2 | 47.0 | 67.1 | 55.2 | 49.7 |
| Gross Profit | 57.2 | 50.6 | — | 57.8 | 53.0 | 5.3 | — | — |
| R&D | 51.4 | 25.5 | — | 33.4 | 39.1 | 3.6 | — | — |
| SG&A | 121.4 | 90.0 | — | 57.7 | 76.7 | 52.6 | 48.2 | 18.0 |
| Operating Income | -115.6 | -137.4 | — | -187.8 | -412.0 | 9.6 | 676.7 | -123.1 |
| Income Tax | — | 0.2 | — | -12.8 | -6.7 | -28.9 | 83.3 | -9.8 |
| Net Income | -133.2 | -107.9 | — | -177.7 | -755.9 | -44.0 | -29.8 | -82.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ABTC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M 100.0% | $71.5M 100.0% | $65.0M 100.0% | $10.5M 100.0% | $17.6M 100.0% | — | $12.6M 100.0% | $10.8M 100.0% | $10.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $92.0M 49.7% | $39.5M 55.2% | $43.6M 67.1% | $4.9M 47.0% | $7.4M 42.2% | $4.4M | $6.2M 49.4% | $4.6M 42.8% | $4.4M 41.6% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | $3.4M 5.3% | $5.5M 53.0% | $10.2M 57.8% | $5.2M | $6.4M 50.6% | $6.2M 57.2% | $6.1M 58.4% |
| Research & Development | — | — | $2.3M 3.6% | $4.1M 39.1% | $5.9M 33.4% | $2.1M | $3.2M 25.5% | $5.6M 51.4% | $2.6M 25.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $33.4M 18.0% | $34.5M 48.2% | $34.2M 52.6% | $8.0M 76.7% | $10.2M 57.7% | $14.2M | $11.3M 90.0% | $13.1M 121.4% | $5.9M 56.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | $10.3M 15.9% | $48.6M 465.0% | $43.3M 245.7% | — | $23.6M 188.0% | $18.7M 172.8% | $8.6M 81.9% |
| Operating Income | -$228.0M -123.1% | $484.1M 676.7% | $6.2M 9.6% | -$43.1M -412.0% | -$33.1M -187.8% | — | -$17.3M -137.4% | -$12.5M -115.6% | -$2.5M -23.5% |
| Interest Expense | — | $3.5M 4.9% | $8.8M 13.6% | — | — | — | $4K 0.0% | -$91K -0.8% | -$6K -0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | $160K 1.3% | $91K 0.8% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $56.7M 30.6% | $9.3M 12.9% | $14.6M 22.4% | -$3.9M -37.3% | -$227K -1.3% | — | $2.9M 22.9% | $109K 1.0% | -$25K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$171.3M -92.5% | $493.4M 689.7% | $20.8M 32.0% | -$47.0M -449.2% | -$33.3M -189.1% | — | -$14.4M -114.4% | -$12.4M -114.6% | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$18.1M -9.8% | $59.6M 83.3% | -$18.8M -28.9% | -$701K -6.7% | -$2.3M -12.8% | — | $31K 0.2% | — | — |
| Net Income | -$153.2M -82.7% | -$21.3M -29.8% | -$28.6M -44.0% | -$79.1M -755.9% | -$31.3M -177.7% | -$10.8M | -$13.6M -107.9% | -$14.4M -133.2% | -$1.7M -16.2% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.17 | $0.49 | $0.04 | $-546.56 | $-24.44 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.17 | $0.49 | $0.04 | $-546.56 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 905.0M | 891.8M | 891.8M | 146K | 1.3M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 905.1M | 891.8M | 891.8M | 146K | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 838 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM | $941.8B | 17.4× | — | 5.2× | 2.8% | — | 31.3% | 15.7% | 13.4% | — | 4,823 |
| V | $694.5B | — | — | 17.4× | 11.3% | — | 50.1% | 52.9% | 31.8% | — | 4,229 |
| MA | $512.0B | 34.3× | — | 15.6× | 16.4% | — | 45.6% | 193% | 56.0% | — | 3,430 |
| BAC | $419.6B | 15.3× | — | 3.7× | 6.8% | — | 27.0% | 10.1% | 4.9% | — | 3,337 |
| GS | $282.1B | 18.5× | — | — | — | — | — | 13.7% | 3.6% | — | 2,857 |
| WFC | $268.7B | 13.9× | — | — | — | — | — | 11.8% | 5.7% | — | 2,691 |
| AXP | $213.5B | 20.2× | — | 5.2× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 2,787 |
| TYFG | $191.9B | 14.2× | — | 11135.5× | 10.2% | — | 79.3% | 8.7% | 8.7% | — | 1 |
| SCHW | $188.8B | 22.5× | — | 7.9× | 22.0% | — | 37.0% | 17.9% | 17.9% | — | 2,225 |
| HDB | $173.4B | 21.8× | — | 6.8× | 15.2% | — | 30.8% | 8.8% | 4.5% | — | 570 |
| UBS | $169.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 660 |
| BLK | $163.4B | 29.9× | — | 6.8× | 89.3% | — | 22.9% | 9.9% | 8.1% | — | 2,196 |
| GLD | $134.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,072 |
| CB | $133.7B | 13.3× | — | 2.3× | 6.5% | — | 17.4% | 14.0% | 11.3% | — | 2,002 |
| PGR | $126.8B | 11.3× | — | 1.4× | 16.3% | — | 12.9% | 37.3% | 37.3% | — | 1,685 |
| SPGI | $120.7B | 27.6× | 17.3× | 7.9× | 7.9% | 70.2% | 29.2% | 14.4% | 10.1% | 1.7× | 2,005 |
| HOOD | $97.6B | 53.6× | — | 21.8× | 51.6% | — | 42.1% | 20.6% | 20.6% | — | 1,230 |
| CME | $97.5B | 24.3× | — | 15.0× | 6.4% | — | 62.5% | 14.2% | 14.2% | — | 1,699 |
| USB | $96.4B | 13.0× | — | 3.4× | 4.4% | — | 26.4% | 11.6% | 9.2% | — | 1,901 |
| BX | $93.9B | 32.4× | — | 6.5× | 9.2% | — | 20.9% | 34.8% | 14.2% | — | 2,037 |
| PNC | $91.9B | 14.0× | — | 4.0× | 7.2% | — | 30.3% | 11.5% | 5.9% | — | 1,839 |
| AMUB | $89.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| KKR | $87.5B | — | — | 4.5× | -11.0% | — | 12.2% | 7.7% | 7.7% | — | 1,216 |
| ICE | $86.9B | 26.6× | 20.6× | 6.9× | 7.5% | — | 26.2% | 11.5% | 6.8% | 3.8× | 1,641 |
| MRSH | $84.7B | 20.7× | 15.4× | 3.1× | 10.3% | — | 15.4% | 27.2% | 11.9% | 3.0× | 1,471 |
| ABTC | $8.0B | — | — | 43.2× | 159% | 50.3% | -82.7% | -23.0% | -23.0% | — | 141 |
Peers = companies sharing ABTC's sector (Financial Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.