Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 355 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $50.27 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.6%/yr for a decade (off $271M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.10B shares · net debt $621M
mean 37.7% · volatility σ 76% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 8.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (76%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| ACIW | $5.2B | 23.3× | 13.6× | 2.9× | 10.4% | 49.0% | 12.9% | 14.9% | 9.7% | 1.9× | 355 |
Peers = companies sharing ACIW's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.76B 100.0% | $1.59B 100.0% | $1.45B 100.0% | $1.42B 100.0% | $1.37B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $1.26B 100.0% | $1.01B 100.0% | $1.02B 100.0% | $1.01B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $897.7M 51.0% | $791.8M 49.7% | $719.2M 49.5% | $696.1M 49.0% | $638.9M 46.6% | $622.5M 48.1% | $617.5M 49.1% | $430.4M 42.6% | $452.3M 44.2% | $444.9M 44.2% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $422.6M 42.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $142.7M 8.1% | $118.4M 7.4% | $117.2M 8.1% | $114.2M 8.0% | $123.8M 9.0% | $152.5M 11.8% | $135.3M 10.8% | $107.4M 10.6% | $153.0M 14.9% | $113.6M 11.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.43B 81.3% | $1.29B 80.7% | $1.23B 84.8% | $1.22B 85.7% | $1.16B 84.7% | $1.15B 88.8% | $1.13B 90.2% | $883.9M 87.5% | $939.6M 91.7% | $784.6M 78.0% |
| Operating Income | $329.9M 18.7% | $308.1M 19.3% | $220.4M 15.2% | $203.8M 14.3% | $209.9M 15.3% | $144.7M 11.2% | $123.8M 9.8% | $125.9M 12.5% | $84.6M 8.3% | $221.1M 22.0% |
| Interest Expense | $57.8M 3.3% | $72.5M 4.5% | $78.5M 5.4% | $53.2M 3.7% | $45.1M 3.3% | $56.6M 4.4% | $64.0M 5.1% | $41.5M 4.1% | $39.0M 3.8% | $40.2M 4.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $14.9M 0.8% | $15.9M 1.0% | $14.2M 1.0% | $12.5M 0.9% | $11.5M 0.8% | $11.6M 0.9% | $12.0M 1.0% | $11.1M 1.1% | $564K 0.1% | $530K 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$23.2M -1.3% | -$57.7M -3.6% | -$72.8M -5.0% | $2.8M 0.2% | -$34.8M -2.5% | -$46.1M -3.6% | -$51.5M -4.1% | -$34.1M -3.4% | -$41.1M -4.0% | -$35.5M -3.5% |
| Pretax Income | $306.7M 17.4% | $250.4M 15.7% | $147.6M 10.2% | $206.6M 14.5% | $175.1M 12.8% | $98.6M 7.6% | $72.2M 5.7% | $91.8M 9.1% | $43.6M 4.3% | $185.6M 18.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $80.0M 4.5% | $47.3M 3.0% | $26.1M 1.8% | $64.5M 4.5% | $47.3M 3.4% | $26.0M 2.0% | $5.1M 0.4% | $22.9M 2.3% | $38.4M 3.8% | $56.0M 5.6% |
| Net Income | $226.7M 12.9% | $203.1M 12.7% | $121.5M 8.4% | $142.2M 10.0% | $127.8M 9.3% | $72.7M 5.6% | $67.1M 5.3% | $68.9M 6.8% | $5.1M 0.5% | $129.5M 12.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.18 | $1.93 | $1.12 | $1.25 | $1.09 | $0.62 | $0.58 | $0.59 | $0.04 | $1.10 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.16 | $1.91 | $1.12 | $1.24 | $1.08 | $0.62 | $0.57 | $0.59 | $0.04 | $1.09 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 104.0M | 105.5M | 108.5M | 113.7M | 117.4M | 116.4M | 116.2M | 116.1M | 118.1M | 117.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 104.8M | 106.5M | 108.9M | 114.2M | 118.6M | 118.1M | 118.6M | 117.6M | 119.4M | 118.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $203M buybacks = $203M returned on $310M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $196M covers the $56M due within a year 3.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2013-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~7.1% on $818M of debt.
Cash of $196M fully covers short-term debt of $41M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 44th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 42.6 | 49.1 | 48.1 | 46.6 | 49.0 | 49.5 | 49.7 | 51.0 |
| SG&A | 10.6 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Operating Income | 12.5 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 15.3 | 14.3 | 15.2 | 19.3 | 18.7 |
| Income Tax | 2.3 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Net Income | 6.8 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 8.4 | 12.7 | 12.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ACIW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.