Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 593 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $61.99 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -1.9%/yr for a decade (off $661M normalized FCF).
The market's -1.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt -$1.6B
mean 13.9% · volatility σ 62% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied -1.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (62%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 20% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $134M dividends + $388M buybacks = $522M returned on $685M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 31%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 23%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.6B covers the $66M due within a year 23.9× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~4529.5% on $4M of debt.
Cash of $1.6B fully covers short-term debt of $66M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.14B 100.0% | $16.11B 100.0% | $14.38B 100.0% | $13.15B 100.0% | $13.34B 100.0% | $13.24B 100.0% | $13.64B 100.0% | $13.88B 100.0% | $18.20B 100.0% | $17.41B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $14.92B 92.5% | $15.02B 93.3% | $13.43B 93.4% | $12.30B 93.6% | $12.54B 94.0% | $12.53B 94.6% | $13.03B 95.5% | $13.40B 96.5% | $17.52B 96.2% | — |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $19.50B 140.5% | $17.52B 96.2% | $16.77B 96.3% |
| Gross Profit | $1.22B 7.5% | $1.08B 6.7% | $945.5M 6.6% | $848.0M 6.4% | $798.4M 6.0% | $709.6M 5.4% | $611.7M 4.5% | $479.0M 3.5% | $683.7M 3.8% | $642.8M 3.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $157.8M 1.0% | $160.1M 1.0% | $153.6M 1.1% | $147.3M 1.1% | $155.1M 1.2% | $188.5M 1.4% | $148.1M 1.1% | $135.8M 1.0% | $133.3M 0.7% | $115.1M 0.7% |
| Operating Income | $1.03B 6.4% | $827.4M 5.1% | $324.1M 2.3% | $646.8M 4.9% | $629.6M 4.7% | $381.5M 2.9% | $396.1M 2.9% | $392.6M 2.8% | $653.9M 3.6% | $375.5M 2.2% |
| Interest Expense | $184.3M 1.1% | $185.4M 1.2% | $159.3M 1.1% | $110.3M 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $62.9M 0.4% | $58.6M 0.4% | $40.3M 0.3% | $8.2M 0.1% | $6.7M 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$2.5M -0.0% | $2.1M 0.0% | -$5.3M -0.0% | $14.2M 0.1% | $17.6M 0.1% | $11.1M 0.1% | $14.6M 0.1% | $20.6M 0.1% | $6.6M 0.0% | $8.2M 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $915.6M 5.7% | $718.2M 4.5% | $213.4M 1.5% | $550.7M 4.2% | $408.8M 3.1% | $232.6M 1.8% | $249.2M 1.8% | $212.2M 1.5% | $429.2M 2.4% | $125.6M 0.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $204.0M 1.3% | $152.9M 0.9% | $56.1M 0.4% | $136.1M 1.0% | $89.0M 0.7% | $45.8M 0.3% | $13.5M 0.1% | -$3.5M -0.0% | $7.7M 0.0% | -$37.9M -0.2% |
| Net Income | $561.8M 3.5% | $402.3M 2.5% | $55.3M 0.4% | $310.6M 2.4% | $173.2M 1.3% | -$186.4M -1.4% | -$261.1M -1.9% | $136.5M 1.0% | $339.4M 1.9% | $96.1M 0.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.24 | $2.97 | $0.40 | $2.21 | $1.18 | $-1.17 | $-1.66 | $0.86 | $2.18 | $0.62 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.21 | $2.95 | $0.39 | $2.18 | $1.16 | $-1.16 | $-1.63 | $0.84 | $2.13 | $0.62 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 132.4M | 135.5M | 138.6M | 140.8M | 147.3M | 159.0M | 157.0M | 159.1M | 155.7M | 154.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 133.3M | 136.5M | 140.1M | 142.7M | 149.7M | 161.3M | 159.7M | 162.3M | 159.1M | 156.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 50th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 96.5 | 95.5 | 94.6 | 94.0 | 93.6 | 93.4 | 93.3 | 92.5 |
| Gross Profit | 3.5 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 7.5 |
| SG&A | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Operating Income | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| Income Tax | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| Net Income | 1.0 | -1.9 | -1.4 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ACM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.37T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $376.4B | 43.0× | 30.0× | 5.6× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $329.6B | 38.6× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $260.4B | 39.1× | 18.5× | 2.9× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $200.6B | 79.9× | 40.4× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.0B | 37.0× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $179.9B | 48.6× | 32.1× | 5.6× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $165.7B | 23.3× | 15.9× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $164.8B | 40.6× | — | 6.0× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $122.1B | 24.8× | 16.0× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $121.1B | 34.8× | 27.3× | 6.1× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $107.9B | 24.8× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $95.7B | 33.1× | 23.6× | 4.5× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| GD | $95.5B | 22.9× | 16.8× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| VRT | $95.4B | 73.1× | 45.2× | 9.3× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| PWR | $95.2B | 93.6× | 47.2× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $93.4B | 28.5× | — | 4.0× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $92.2B | 61.9× | 40.6× | 11.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| MMM | $88.0B | 27.6× | 16.9× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $87.6B | 30.6× | 14.1× | 6.2× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| WM | $85.1B | 31.5× | 11.9× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| EMR | $84.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.7× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $84.1B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| CTAS | $79.6B | 44.9× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| ACM | $8.2B | 14.7× | 6.2× | 0.5× | 0.2% | 7.5% | 3.5% | 22.5% | 22.5% | 0.0× | 593 |
Peers = companies sharing ACM's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.