Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.32% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $196.5M 100.0% | $194.5M 100.0% | $191.5M 100.0% | $194.0M 100.0% | $182.1M 100.0% | $164.0M 100.0% | $142.5M 100.0% | $137.3M 100.0% | $130.6M 100.0% | $124.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $119.1M 60.6% | $118.1M 60.7% | $119.3M 62.3% | $130.4M 67.2% | $117.3M 64.4% | $104.4M 63.7% | $90.5M 63.5% | $86.7M 63.1% | $82.7M 63.3% | $79.0M 63.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $82.7M 63.3% | $79.0M 63.4% |
| Gross Profit | $77.4M 39.4% | $76.4M 39.3% | $72.2M 37.7% | $63.6M 32.8% | $64.8M 35.6% | $59.6M 36.3% | $52.0M 36.5% | $50.6M 36.9% | $47.9M 36.7% | $45.6M 36.6% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | $251K 0.2% | $596K 0.4% | $734K 0.5% | $752K 0.6% | $750K 0.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $62.7M 31.9% | $62.2M 32.0% | $59.0M 30.8% | $57.3M 29.5% | $52.0M 28.6% | $48.2M 29.4% | $43.6M 30.6% | $43.2M 31.5% | $40.0M 30.7% | $37.1M 29.8% |
| Operating Income | $14.7M 7.5% | $14.1M 7.3% | $13.2M 6.9% | $6.3M 3.2% | $12.8M 7.0% | $11.4M 7.0% | $8.4M 5.9% | $7.5M 5.4% | $7.9M 6.0% | $8.4M 6.8% |
| Interest Expense | $1.7M 0.9% | $2.1M 1.1% | $3.1M 1.6% | $2.4M 1.2% | $922K 0.5% | $944K 0.6% | $1.8M 1.3% | $1.9M 1.4% | $1.4M 1.0% | $869K 0.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $123K 0.1% | $141K 0.1% | $119K 0.1% | $32K 0.0% | $14K 0.0% | $25K 0.0% | $40K 0.0% | $33K 0.0% | $29K 0.0% | $119 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$47K -0.0% | $95K 0.0% | $12.5M 6.5% | -$246K -0.1% | $3.3M 1.8% | -$666K -0.4% | -$1.9M -1.3% | -$1.9M -1.4% | -$1.4M -1.1% | -$945K -0.8% |
| Pretax Income | $13.1M 6.7% | $12.3M 6.3% | $22.7M 11.9% | $3.7M 1.9% | $15.2M 8.3% | $9.8M 6.0% | $6.5M 4.6% | $5.5M 4.0% | $6.5M 5.0% | $7.5M 6.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.9M 1.5% | $2.3M 1.2% | $4.9M 2.6% | $628K 0.3% | $1.5M 0.8% | $1.7M 1.1% | $1.0M 0.7% | $933K 0.7% | $2.4M 1.9% | $1.6M 1.3% |
| Net Income | $10.2M 5.2% | $10.0M 5.2% | $17.8M 9.3% | $3.0M 1.6% | $13.7M 7.5% | $8.1M 4.9% | $5.5M 3.9% | $4.6M 3.3% | $4.1M 3.1% | $5.9M 4.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.69 | $2.71 | $4.98 | $0.86 | $3.93 | $2.42 | $1.65 | $1.36 | $1.21 | $1.76 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.49 | $2.45 | $4.86 | $0.82 | $3.45 | $2.31 | $1.60 | $1.30 | $1.09 | $1.64 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 3.8M | 3.7M | 3.6M | 3.5M | 3.5M | 3.3M | 3.4M | 3.4M | 3.4M | 3.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 4.1M | 4.1M | 3.7M | 3.7M | 4.0M | 3.5M | 3.5M | 3.5M | 3.7M | 3.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $61.94 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.7%/yr for a decade (off $12M normalized FCF).
The market's 7.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt $8M
mean 55.0% · volatility σ 292% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 7.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (292%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 31% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $2M dividends + $0 buybacks = $2M returned on $8M FCF.
8 consecutive years of dividend increases · 5%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~14.2% on $12M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $858.2B | 39.4× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.1B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.1B | 28.9× | 24.8× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.5B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $298.3B | 26.4× | 17.4× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.9B | 22.4× | 15.0× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $117.4B | 17.0× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.7B | 33.0× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $70.0B | 19.0× | 10.2× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $69.7B | 33.1× | 19.4× | 3.4× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.6B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $43.2B | 20.8× | 14.5× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| FMX | $41.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| ADM | $41.1B | 38.1× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| JBS | $40.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.9B | 39.7× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.4B | 21.1× | 9.6× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| HSY | $34.6B | — | 20.3× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $34.4B | — | 782.5× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.6× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.1B | 18.0× | 8.0× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.2B | 31.6× | 18.9× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| ACU | $236M | 24.9× | 13.2× | 1.2× | 1.1% | 39.4% | 5.2% | 8.7% | 7.9% | 0.6× | 70 |
Peers = companies sharing ACU's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 96th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 63.1 | 63.5 | 63.7 | 64.4 | 67.2 | 62.3 | 60.7 | 60.6 |
| Gross Profit | 36.9 | 36.5 | 36.3 | 35.6 | 32.8 | 37.7 | 39.3 | 39.4 |
| R&D | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 31.5 | 30.6 | 29.4 | 28.6 | 29.5 | 30.8 | 32.0 | 31.9 |
| Operating Income | 5.4 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Income Tax | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Net Income | 3.3 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 9.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ACU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.