Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.68% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
1/6 of the 9 checks — 3 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 6 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -488%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Interest last disclosed in FY2016 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 14 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125K 100.0% | $85K 100.0% | $493K 100.0% | $1.5M 100.0% | $1.4M 100.0% | $1.3M 100.0% | $1.4M 100.0% | $1.4M 100.0% | $655K 100.0% | $456K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $73K 58.0% | $78K 92.3% | $195K 39.6% | $505K 33.6% | $487K 34.3% | $447K 35.7% | $532K 37.7% | $416K 29.5% | $148K 22.6% | $182K 39.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $148K 22.6% | $182K 39.8% |
| Gross Profit | — | $7K 7.7% | $297K 60.4% | $1.0M 66.4% | $934K 65.7% | $805K 64.3% | $880K 62.3% | $996K 70.5% | $507K 77.4% | $275K 60.2% |
| Research & Development | — | $2.2M 2642.9% | $98K 19.9% | $320K 21.3% | $316K 22.2% | $373K 29.8% | $423K 30.0% | $526K 37.3% | $289K 44.1% | $406K 88.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $25.9M 20692.5% | $7.2M 8531.6% | $7.9M 1596.2% | $11.1M 738.0% | $10.9M 769.5% | $10.4M 826.7% | $9.8M 692.9% | $4.6M 327.8% | $4.1M 618.5% | $5.2M 1133.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $28.6M 22788.6% | $10.3M 12156.8% | $11.4M 2323.8% | $27.0M 1795.7% | — | — | — | $7.9M 556.9% | $6.1M 924.4% | — |
| Operating Income | -$180.9M -144404.5% | -$10.3M -12149.1% | -$11.1M -2263.4% | -$26.0M -1729.3% | -$20.4M -1437.9% | -$25.4M -2025.1% | -$22.6M -1604.2% | -$7.9M -556.9% | — | — |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | — | — | — | -$25.7M -1709.6% | -$20.3M -1430.2% | -$25.9M -2067.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | -$662K -46.6% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$233.1M -186053.4% | -$12.7M -14932.3% | -$14.0M -2838.8% | -$25.7M -1709.6% | -$19.7M -1383.6% | -$25.9M -2067.0% | -$19.4M -1373.7% | -$10.1M -714.5% | — | — |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-13.37 | $-34.83 | $-3.48 | $-6.98 | $-0.36 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 17.4M | 364K | 4.0M | 3.7M | 54.9M | 12.0M | 2.9M | 1.3M | 6.4M | 2.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 17.4M | 364K | 4.0M | 3.7M | 54.9M | 12.0M | 2.9M | 1.3M | 6.4M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 20th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 34.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 29.5 | 37.7 | 35.7 | 34.3 | 33.6 | 39.6 | 92.3 | 58.0 |
| Gross Profit | 70.5 | 62.3 | 64.3 | 65.7 | 66.4 | 60.4 | 7.7 | — |
| R&D | 37.3 | 30.0 | 29.8 | 22.2 | 21.3 | 19.9 | 2642.9 | — |
| SG&A | 327.8 | 692.9 | 826.7 | 769.5 | 738.0 | 1596.2 | 8531.6 | 20692.5 |
| Operating Income | -556.9 | -1604.2 | -2025.1 | -1437.9 | -1729.3 | -2263.4 | -12149.1 | -144404.5 |
| Income Tax | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | -46.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -714.5 | -1373.7 | -2067.0 | -1383.6 | -1709.6 | -2838.8 | -14932.3 | -186053.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AGPU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| AGPU | $45M | — | — | 358.2× | 47.7% | 42.0% | -186053% | -488% | -488% | — | 13 |
Peers = companies sharing AGPU's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.