Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 231 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $101M dividends + $0 buybacks = $101M returned.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · -4%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $39M is below the $268M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-06-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5.1% on $1.9B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 62th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 13.2 | 11.8 | 14.3 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 12.2 | 11.3 | 11.1 |
| Operating Income | 12.6 | 25.2 | -45.9 | 10.5 | 20.9 | 14.5 | 18.3 | 12.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | -6.0 | 8.0 | -26.2 | 8.9 | -20.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 4.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AKR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $410.8M 100.0% | $359.7M 100.0% | $338.7M 100.0% | $326.3M 100.0% | $292.5M 100.0% | $250.9M 100.0% | $289.6M 100.0% | $259.7M 100.0% | $248.6M 100.0% | $189.9M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $45.7M 11.1% | $40.6M 11.3% | $41.5M 12.2% | $44.1M 13.5% | $40.1M 13.7% | $35.8M 14.3% | $34.3M 11.8% | $34.3M 13.2% | $33.8M 13.6% | $40.6M 21.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $363.8M 88.6% | $293.2M 81.5% | $289.6M 85.5% | $315.2M 96.6% | $272.4M 93.1% | $366.7M 146.1% | $253.0M 87.4% | $232.1M 89.4% | $231.2M 93.0% | $168.1M 88.5% |
| Operating Income | $49.4M 12.0% | $65.7M 18.3% | $49.1M 14.5% | $68.2M 20.9% | $30.7M 10.5% | -$115.1M -45.9% | $73.1M 25.2% | $32.7M 12.6% | $66.2M 26.6% | $21.9M 11.5% |
| Interest Expense | $95.3M 23.2% | $92.6M 25.7% | $93.3M 27.5% | $80.2M 24.6% | $68.0M 23.3% | $69.7M 27.8% | $69.2M 23.9% | $70.0M 26.9% | $59.0M 23.7% | $34.6M 18.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $23.7M 5.8% | $25.1M 7.0% | $20.0M 5.9% | $14.6M 4.5% | $9.1M 3.1% | $9.0M 3.6% | $8.0M 2.8% | $13.2M 5.1% | $29.1M 11.7% | $25.8M 13.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$39.6M -9.6% | $8.4M 2.3% | -$1.4M -0.4% | -$65.2M -20.0% | $26.1M 8.9% | -$65.4M -26.1% | $24.7M 8.5% | -$14.8M -5.7% | $65.3M 26.3% | $52.5M 27.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $412K 0.1% | $212K 0.1% | $301K 0.1% | $12K 0.0% | $93K 0.0% | $269K 0.1% | $1.5M 0.5% | $934K 0.4% | $1.0M 0.4% | -$105K -0.1% |
| Net Income | $16.9M 4.1% | $21.6M 6.0% | $19.9M 5.9% | -$65.3M -20.0% | $26.0M 8.9% | -$65.7M -26.2% | $23.2M 8.0% | -$15.7M -6.0% | $64.3M 25.9% | $72.8M 38.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.10 | $0.19 | $0.20 | $-0.38 | $0.26 | $-0.11 | — | — | — | $0.94 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.10 | $0.19 | $0.20 | $-0.40 | $0.26 | $-0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 128.7M | 108.3M | 95.3M | 94.6M | 87.7M | 86.4M | 84.4M | 82.1M | 83.7M | 76.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 240 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $159.4B | 164.7× | — | 14.7× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 1.6% | — | 1,425 |
| PLD | $125.3B | 37.9× | — | 14.3× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,592 |
| XHG | $124.6B | — | — | 2429.0× | 24.9% | 2.2% | -205% | 85.0% | 88.3% | — | 1 |
| EQIX | $100.3B | 74.2× | 25.6× | 10.9× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 0.3× | 1,229 |
| AMT | $81.1B | 32.2× | 14.0× | 7.6× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 37.3% | 0.6× | 1,662 |
| SPG | $67.0B | 14.5× | — | 10.5× | 6.7% | — | 84.3% | 103% | 15.9% | — | 1,242 |
| O | $52.9B | 48.4× | — | 9.2× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| PSA | $52.0B | 32.9× | — | 10.8× | 2.7% | — | 37.0% | 19.3% | 9.1% | — | 1,045 |
| CBRE | $41.3B | 36.2× | — | 1.0× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| VTR | $41.2B | 160.5× | — | 7.1× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| IRM | $33.8B | 233.3× | 22.9× | 4.9× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.5× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $28.9B | 29.8× | 13.5× | 8.6× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| VICI | $25.4B | 9.1× | — | 6.3× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| SBAC | $18.9B | 18.2× | 21.4× | 6.7× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 13.1% | 8.7× | 636 |
| BEKE | $17.9B | 135.7× | 38.6× | 1.3× | 5.6% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 197 |
| ESS | $17.4B | 26.0× | 11.5× | 9.2× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| INVH | $16.4B | 28.0× | — | 6.0× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| JLL | $15.8B | 20.5× | 11.8× | 0.6× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 10.4% | 0.1× | 615 |
| WY | $15.3B | 47.2× | 16.4× | 2.2× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.5× | 868 |
| KIM | $15.2B | — | 16.2× | 7.1× | 5.1% | — | 27.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | 5.5× | 633 |
| HST | $15.0B | 19.9× | — | 2.5× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| LAMR | $14.9B | 25.4× | — | 6.6× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 13.2% | — | 655 |
| NLY | $14.9B | 7.2× | — | — | — | — | — | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 743 |
| AKR | $2.5B | 192.8× | 21.0× | 6.2× | 14.2% | — | 4.1% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 9.0× | 231 |
Peers = companies sharing AKR's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position