Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 176 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $11.77 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -7.2%/yr for a decade (off $257M normalized FCF).
The market's -7.2% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $1.2B
mean 22.0% · volatility σ 61% · implied rate exceeded in 5/8 yrs
Central path = implied -7.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (61%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $18M buybacks = $18M returned on $272M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 3%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $502M covers the $11M due within a year 45.4× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.8% on $1.8B of debt.
Cash of $502M fully covers short-term debt of $11M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.31B 100.0% | $2.42B 100.0% | $2.71B 100.0% | $3.10B 100.0% | $3.08B 100.0% | $2.81B 100.0% | $3.06B 100.0% | $2.97B 100.0% | $2.81B 100.0% | $2.76B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.14B 49.4% | $1.13B 46.8% | $1.33B 49.0% | $1.52B 49.0% | $1.43B 46.5% | $1.40B 49.8% | $1.51B 49.2% | $1.45B 48.7% | $1.34B 47.8% | $1.28B 46.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $818.3M 35.4% | $781.3M 32.3% | $764.1M 28.2% | $896.8M 29.0% | $891.7M 29.0% | $708.8M 25.2% | $679.4M 22.2% | $657.5M 22.1% | $613.3M 21.9% | $636.0M 23.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.18B 94.2% | $2.46B 101.6% | $2.32B 85.7% | $3.01B 97.2% | $2.59B 84.1% | $2.37B 84.3% | $2.44B 79.6% | $2.25B 75.5% | $2.08B 74.3% | $2.10B 76.1% |
| Operating Income | $133.3M 5.8% | -$39.6M -1.6% | $388.4M 14.3% | $86.9M 2.8% | $489.9M 15.9% | $442.6M 15.7% | $625.3M 20.4% | $726.9M 24.5% | $722.4M 25.7% | $657.6M 23.9% |
| Interest Expense | $172.4M 7.5% | $166.2M 6.9% | $152.7M 5.6% | $133.8M 4.3% | $129.1M 4.2% | $138.6M 4.9% | $157.8M 5.2% | $155.0M 5.2% | $134.0M 4.8% | $123.6M 4.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $27.7M 1.2% | $36.8M 1.5% | $37.0M 1.4% | $13.3M 0.4% | $10.2M 0.3% | $30.0M 1.1% | $24.7M 0.8% | $19.2M 0.6% | $14.7M 0.5% | $5.1M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $14.7M 0.6% | -$134.9M -5.6% | -$92.4M -3.4% | -$116.9M -3.8% | -$115.7M -3.8% | -$40.3M -1.4% | -$139.1M -4.5% | -$106.6M -3.6% | -$82.0M -2.9% | -$202.7M -7.4% |
| Pretax Income | $148.0M 6.4% | -$174.5M -7.2% | $296.0M 10.9% | -$30.0M -1.0% | $374.2M 12.2% | $402.4M 14.3% | $486.2M 15.9% | $620.3M 20.9% | $640.4M 22.8% | $454.8M 16.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $46.2M 2.0% | $43.5M 1.8% | $94.6M 3.5% | -$41.0M -1.3% | $94.4M 3.1% | $145.4M 5.2% | $78.5M 2.6% | $156.3M 5.3% | $150.7M 5.4% | $164.9M 6.0% |
| Net Income | $89.4M 3.9% | -$226.5M -9.4% | $215.5M 7.9% | $7.6M 0.2% | $250.6M 8.1% | $240.0M 8.5% | $380.5M 12.4% | $446.2M 15.0% | $471.3M 16.8% | $270.5M 9.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.01 | $-5.10 | $4.92 | $0.18 | $5.92 | $4.70 | $6.77 | $7.68 | $7.26 | $3.77 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.66 | $-5.10 | $4.90 | $0.17 | $5.77 | $4.64 | $6.67 | $7.57 | $7.18 | $3.74 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 44.4M | 44.4M | 43.8M | 43.1M | 42.4M | 51.0M | 56.2M | 58.1M | 64.9M | 71.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 56.6M | 44.4M | 44.0M | 43.7M | 43.4M | 51.7M | 57.0M | 58.9M | 65.6M | 72.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| AMCX | $523M | 7.1× | 7.8× | 0.2× | -4.5% | 50.6% | 3.9% | 9.1% | 3.3% | 7.7× | 176 |
Peers = companies sharing AMCX's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 29th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 96.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 48.7 | 49.2 | 49.8 | 46.5 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 46.8 | 49.4 |
| SG&A | 22.1 | 22.2 | 25.2 | 29.0 | 29.0 | 28.2 | 32.3 | 35.4 |
| Operating Income | 24.5 | 20.4 | 15.7 | 15.9 | 2.8 | 14.3 | -1.6 | 5.8 |
| Income Tax | 5.3 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 3.1 | -1.3 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| Net Income | 15.0 | 12.4 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 0.2 | 7.9 | -9.4 | 3.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on AMCX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.