Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 179 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $71M covers the $18M due within a year 4.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~8.8% on $451M of debt.
Cash of $71M fully covers short-term debt of $24M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $26.16 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.9%/yr for a decade (off $402M normalized FCF).
The market's -2.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares (market data) · net debt $380M
mean 1.1% · volatility σ 36% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied -2.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (36%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $388M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.19B 100.0% | $2.45B 100.0% | $2.57B 100.0% | $2.42B 100.0% | $1.58B 100.0% | $1.33B 100.0% | $1.96B 100.0% | $2.00B 100.0% | $1.80B 100.0% | $1.93B 100.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.21B 60.3% | $1.09B 60.8% | $1.12B 58.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $83.1M 3.8% | $82.2M 3.4% | $79.1M 3.1% | $80.4M 3.3% | $70.3M 4.4% | $59.8M 4.5% | $73.0M 3.7% | $68.3M 3.4% | $61.8M 3.4% | $72.5M 3.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.81B 82.4% | $2.05B 83.9% | $1.89B 73.8% | $1.75B 72.4% | $1.36B 85.8% | $1.41B 106.2% | $1.70B 86.8% | $1.63B 81.4% | $1.46B 81.5% | $1.56B 80.9% |
| Operating Income | $385.3M 17.6% | $394.1M 16.1% | $672.4M 26.2% | $667.4M 27.6% | $223.8M 14.2% | -$82.9M -6.2% | $259.5M 13.2% | $372.3M 18.6% | $331.9M 18.5% | $368.1M 19.1% |
| Interest Expense | $39.7M 1.8% | $35.2M 1.4% | $36.1M 1.4% | $37.3M 1.5% | $39.2M 2.5% | $45.6M 3.4% | $45.9M 2.3% | $40.2M 2.0% | $39.4M 2.2% | $30.7M 1.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.8M 0.1% | $7.2M 0.3% | $9.4M 0.4% | $2.0M 0.1% | $88K 0.0% | $135K 0.0% | $379K 0.0% | $159K 0.0% | $94K 0.0% | $10K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$889K -0.0% | -$2.1M -0.1% | $218K 0.0% | $4.4M 0.2% | -$3.0M -0.2% | -$1.6M -0.1% | $561K 0.0% | -$2.6M -0.1% | -$332K -0.0% | -$1.4M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $336.0M 15.3% | $381.5M 15.6% | $644.5M 25.1% | $642.1M 26.5% | $183.8M 11.6% | -$129.0M -9.7% | $406.7M 20.7% | $367.5M 18.3% | $304.4M 16.9% | $339.6M 17.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $18.8M 0.9% | $15.9M 0.7% | $8.3M 0.3% | $54.0M 2.2% | $417K 0.0% | $35K 0.0% | -$211K -0.0% | $22K 0.0% | $210K 0.0% | $13K 0.0% |
| Net Income | $311.2M 14.2% | $360.9M 14.7% | $630.1M 24.5% | $586.2M 24.2% | $182.8M 11.6% | -$129.2M -9.7% | $399.4M 20.4% | $366.6M 18.3% | $303.6M 16.9% | $339.4M 17.6% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Operating Income | 18.6 | 13.2 | -6.2 | 14.2 | 27.6 | 26.2 | 16.1 | 17.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Net Income | 18.3 | 20.4 | -9.7 | 11.6 | 24.2 | 24.5 | 14.7 | 14.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ARLP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.5B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $544.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.1B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $200.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $165.9B | 20.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $126.2B | 31.3× | 10.8× | 0.9× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $124.6B | 53.3× | 23.6× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $116.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| EQNR | $110.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| PSX | $107.4B | 24.5× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| WMB | $86.6B | 33.1× | 17.6× | 7.2× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $83.3B | — | 12.5× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $78.7B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $78.2B | 22.3× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.7B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $68.4B | 22.4× | 14.0× | 4.0× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.1B | 33.5× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| LNG | $58.8B | 11.1× | 7.7× | 2.9× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| MPLX | $58.7B | — | — | 4.5× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.9× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| OKE | $58.4B | 17.1× | 12.4× | 1.7× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| BKR | $55.9B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $55.4B | 34.0× | 11.1× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| ARLP | $3.3B | — | 5.4× | 1.5× | -10.4% | — | 14.2% | — | — | 0.7× | 179 |
Peers = companies sharing ARLP's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.