Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 249 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $26.95 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.4%/yr for a decade (off $59M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.4% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.07B shares · net debt $148M
mean -16.6% · volatility σ 88% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 15.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (88%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 27% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $17M dividends + $69M buybacks = $86M returned on $65M FCF.
5 consecutive years of dividend increases · 48%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2.7% on $219M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $290.6M 100.0% | $261.7M 100.0% | $251.7M 100.0% | $280.3M 100.0% | $250.0M 100.0% | $225.5M 100.0% | $212.6M 100.0% | $232.2M 100.0% | $235.4M 100.0% | $227.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $60.0M 20.7% | $51.4M 19.6% | $48.0M 19.1% | $56.8M 20.3% | $53.5M 21.4% | $50.1M 22.2% | $48.9M 23.0% | $51.9M 22.3% | $53.3M 22.6% | $54.4M 23.9% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $36.3M 15.4% | $37.5M 16.5% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17.0M 7.2% | $16.9M 7.4% |
| Gross Profit | $230.5M 79.3% | $210.3M 80.4% | $203.7M 80.9% | $223.5M 79.7% | $196.5M 78.6% | $175.4M 77.8% | $163.7M 77.0% | $180.3M 77.7% | $182.1M 77.4% | $172.9M 76.1% |
| Research & Development | $69.1M 23.8% | $57.7M 22.1% | $55.2M 21.9% | $58.4M 20.8% | $54.1M 21.6% | $58.1M 25.7% | $61.8M 29.1% | $65.2M 28.1% | $63.0M 26.8% | $60.7M 26.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $29.8M 10.3% | $25.3M 9.7% | $23.9M 9.5% | $23.5M 8.4% | $23.4M 9.4% | $21.9M 9.7% | $23.7M 11.1% | $39.6M 17.1% | $28.1M 11.9% | $26.3M 11.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $183.4M 63.1% | $166.3M 63.6% | $165.1M 65.6% | $170.4M 60.8% | $163.1M 65.2% | $157.6M 69.9% | $180.8M 85.1% | $208.0M 89.6% | $192.5M 81.8% | $193.5M 85.1% |
| Operating Income | $47.1M 16.2% | $44.0M 16.8% | $38.6M 15.4% | $53.1M 18.9% | $33.4M 13.4% | $17.7M 7.9% | -$17.1M -8.0% | -$27.7M -11.9% | -$10.4M -4.4% | -$20.6M -9.0% |
| Interest Expense | $5.9M 2.0% | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $1K 0.0% | $237K 0.1% | $129K 0.1% | $162K 0.1% | $424K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.3M 1.8% | $14.1M 5.4% | $5.1M 2.0% | -$363K -0.1% | -$1.7M -0.7% | $1.4M 0.6% | $682K 0.3% | $1.1M 0.5% | $827K 0.4% | -$1.1M -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $52.4M 18.0% | $58.1M 22.2% | $43.8M 17.4% | $52.7M 18.8% | $31.6M 12.7% | $19.1M 8.5% | -$16.4M -7.7% | -$26.5M -11.4% | -$9.5M -4.1% | -$21.6M -9.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $10.3M 3.5% | $8.0M 3.0% | $3.8M 1.5% | $5.8M 2.1% | -$63.2M -25.3% | $1.3M 0.6% | $1.4M 0.7% | $1.1M 0.5% | $1.2M 0.5% | $757K 0.3% |
| Net Income | $42.1M 14.5% | $50.1M 19.2% | $40.0M 15.9% | $46.9M 16.7% | $94.9M 37.9% | $17.8M 7.9% | -$17.8M -8.4% | -$27.6M -11.9% | -$10.8M -4.6% | -$22.4M -9.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.58 | $0.68 | $0.54 | $0.62 | $1.23 | $0.23 | $-0.23 | $-0.38 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.57 | $0.67 | $0.53 | $0.60 | $1.19 | $0.22 | $-0.23 | $-0.38 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 72.3M | 74.1M | 74.2M | 75.5M | 77.0M | 77.8M | 76.1M | 72.9M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 73.6M | 75.3M | 75.5M | 77.8M | 80.0M | 80.0M | 76.1M | 72.9M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| ATEN | $1.9B | 47.3× | 33.5× | 6.6× | 11.0% | 79.3% | 14.5% | 19.9% | 9.8% | 3.5× | 249 |
Peers = companies sharing ATEN's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 12-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 12-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 22.3 | 23.0 | 22.2 | 21.4 | 20.3 | 19.1 | 19.6 | 20.7 |
| Gross Profit | 77.7 | 77.0 | 77.8 | 78.6 | 79.7 | 80.9 | 80.4 | 79.3 |
| R&D | 28.1 | 29.1 | 25.7 | 21.6 | 20.8 | 21.9 | 22.1 | 23.8 |
| SG&A | 17.1 | 11.1 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 8.4 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 10.3 |
| Operating Income | -11.9 | -8.0 | 7.9 | 13.4 | 18.9 | 15.4 | 16.8 | 16.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | -25.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Net Income | -11.9 | -8.4 | 7.9 | 37.9 | 16.7 | 15.9 | 19.2 | 14.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ATEN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.