Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 961 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $162.03 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 17.0%/yr for a decade (off $654M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.16B shares · net debt -$203M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.70B 100.0% | $4.17B 100.0% | $4.28B 100.0% | $4.20B 100.0% | $3.41B 100.0% | $2.82B 100.0% | $2.90B 100.0% | $3.12B 100.0% | $2.76B 100.0% | $2.45B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | $1.45B 34.0% | $1.68B 40.0% | $1.03B 30.3% | $658.9M 23.4% | $858.8M 29.6% | $1.17B 37.5% | — | — |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.71B 69.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.05B 42.8% |
| Operating Income | $1.56B 33.2% | $1.36B 32.5% | $1.07B 25.0% | $921.0M 21.9% | $905.0M 26.6% | $824.1M 29.2% | $746.1M 25.7% | $727.9M 23.4% | $735.6M 26.7% | $657.2M 26.8% |
| Interest Expense | $171.7M 3.7% | $190.6M 4.6% | $137.3M 3.2% | $102.8M 2.4% | $83.6M 2.5% | $84.5M 3.0% | $103.2M 3.6% | $106.6M 3.4% | $120.2M 4.4% | $114.8M 4.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $89.7M 1.9% | $71.0M 1.7% | $69.8M 1.6% | $33.7M 0.8% | -$2.1M -0.1% | $7.2M 0.3% | $7.4M 0.3% | -$10.1M -0.3% | -$11.4M -0.4% | -$234K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $1.48B 31.4% | $1.24B 29.7% | $999.6M 23.4% | $851.9M 20.3% | $819.3M 24.0% | $746.8M 26.5% | $650.3M 22.4% | $611.1M 19.6% | $604.1M 21.9% | $542.2M 22.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $279.3M 5.9% | $192.9M 4.6% | $113.8M 2.7% | $77.5M 1.8% | $153.7M 4.5% | $145.4M 5.2% | $138.9M 4.8% | $8.1M 0.3% | $221.4M 8.0% | $196.6M 8.0% |
| Net Income | $1.20B 25.5% | $1.04B 25.0% | $885.9M 20.7% | $774.4M 18.4% | $665.6M 19.5% | $601.4M 21.3% | $511.4M 17.6% | $603.1M 19.4% | $396.4M 14.4% | $350.1M 14.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.54 | $6.83 | $6.10 | $5.61 | $5.12 | $4.89 | $4.36 | $5.43 | $3.73 | $3.38 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.46 | $6.83 | $6.10 | $5.60 | $5.12 | $4.89 | $4.35 | $5.43 | $3.73 | $3.38 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 158.9M | 152.5M | 145.1M | 137.8M | 129.8M | 122.8M | 117.2M | 111.0M | 106.1M | 103.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 160.6M | 152.7M | 145.2M | 138.1M | 129.8M | 122.9M | 117.5M | 111.0M | 106.1M | 103.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $554M dividends + $0 buybacks = $554M returned on -$1.5B FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 8%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $203M covers the $10M due within a year 20.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-09-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 95 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEV | $249.3B | 52.3× | 124.5× | 6.5× | 9.0% | 19.8% | 12.8% | 43.7% | 43.4% | 0.0× | 2,989 |
| NEE | $169.3B | 24.6× | — | 6.6× | 9.8% | — | 26.5% | 12.5% | 4.6% | — | 2,911 |
| SO | $95.7B | 22.1× | — | 3.2× | 10.6% | — | 14.7% | 12.1% | 11.8% | — | 2,268 |
| DUK | $92.2B | 18.8× | 10.7× | 2.9× | 5.6% | — | 15.7% | 9.6% | 3.7% | 5.1× | 2,360 |
| CEG | $82.0B | 35.5× | 21.5× | 3.2× | 8.3% | — | 9.1% | 16.0% | 9.9% | 2.2× | 1,836 |
| AEP | $65.8B | 18.3× | 12.9× | 3.0× | 10.9% | — | 16.9% | 11.9% | 4.8% | 5.3× | 1,854 |
| D | $56.5B | 18.6× | — | 3.4× | 14.2% | — | 18.2% | 10.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,421 |
| SRE | $53.6B | 29.9× | — | 3.9× | 3.9% | — | 13.4% | 5.8% | 5.1% | — | 1,217 |
| VST | $48.5B | 65.8× | 17.1× | 2.7× | 3.0% | — | 5.3% | 18.5% | 3.9% | 4.8× | 1,246 |
| XEL | $45.9B | 21.5× | — | — | — | — | — | 8.5% | 3.5% | — | 1,208 |
| ETR | $45.7B | 26.4× | 13.1× | 3.5× | 9.0% | — | 13.7% | 10.5% | 3.9% | 5.2× | 1,224 |
| EXC | $43.6B | — | 11.1× | 1.8× | 5.3% | — | 11.4% | 9.6% | 3.6% | 5.9× | 1,230 |
| ED | $38.7B | 19.0× | — | 2.3× | 10.9% | — | 12.0% | 8.4% | 4.0% | — | 1,368 |
| PEG | $35.3B | 16.8× | — | 2.9× | 18.3% | — | 17.3% | 12.4% | 5.3% | — | 1,231 |
| WEC | $34.1B | 21.8× | 14.6× | 3.5× | 14.0% | 66.7% | 15.9% | 11.1% | 4.5% | 5.5× | 1,310 |
| AEE | $28.7B | 19.4× | — | 3.3× | 15.4% | — | 16.6% | 10.9% | 4.5% | — | 884 |
| AWK | $27.0B | 24.3× | 10.3× | 5.3× | 10.1% | — | 21.7% | 10.3% | 8.9% | 0.6× | 1,100 |
| FE | $26.4B | 26.0× | 6.9× | 1.8× | 12.0% | — | 6.8% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 0.1× | 894 |
| ATO | $26.2B | 21.7× | 11.3× | 5.6× | 12.9% | — | 25.5% | 8.8% | 8.8% | — | 961 |
| ES | $25.9B | 15.1× | 10.0× | 1.9× | 13.8% | — | 12.5% | 10.5% | 3.8% | 5.2× | 1,012 |
| PPL | $25.2B | 21.1× | 12.4× | 2.8× | 6.9% | — | 13.1% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 5.4× | 947 |
| CNP | $25.2B | 24.1× | 12.7× | 2.7× | 8.3% | 100.0% | 11.2% | 9.4% | 3.3% | 5.8× | 774 |
| EIX | $21.4B | 4.8× | 5.8× | 1.1× | 9.8% | — | 23.1% | 25.4% | 8.0% | 3.7× | 1,005 |
| CMS | $20.3B | 18.8× | 12.7× | 2.4× | 13.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 3.8% | 6.2× | 762 |
| NRG | $20.2B | 26.5× | 9.8× | 0.7× | 9.2% | — | 2.8% | 51.4% | 4.8% | 5.1× | 1,010 |
Peers = companies sharing ATO's sector (Utilities) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 86th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 37.5 | 29.6 | 23.4 | 30.3 | 40.0 | 34.0 | — | — |
| Operating Income | 23.4 | 25.7 | 29.2 | 26.6 | 21.9 | 25.0 | 32.5 | 33.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.3 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 5.9 |
| Net Income | 19.4 | 17.6 | 21.3 | 19.5 | 18.4 | 20.7 | 25.0 | 25.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ATO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.