Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -32.09% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $28M covers the $0 due within a year 27965000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2016-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~14.2% on $203M of debt.
Cash of $28M fully covers short-term debt of $23M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2015 | FY2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $166.0M 100.0% | $193.9M 100.0% | $220.8M 100.0% | $359.1M 100.0% | $285.2M 100.0% | $148.3M 100.0% | $226.6M 100.0% | $378.0M 100.0% | $550.3M 100.0% | $1.15B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $14.6M 8.8% | $18.4M 9.5% | $19.0M 8.6% | $17.6M 4.9% | $16.5M 5.8% | $18.5M 12.4% | $62.1M 27.4% | $111.4M 29.5% | $87.8M 15.9% | $116.5M 10.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $172.7M 104.0% | $205.6M 106.1% | $203.2M 92.0% | $206.9M 57.6% | $181.8M 63.8% | $410.1M 276.6% | $134.5M 59.3% | -$337.5M -89.3% | $3.29B 598.7% | $1.21B 105.1% |
| Operating Income | -$6.6M -4.0% | -$11.7M -6.1% | $17.6M 8.0% | $152.1M 42.4% | $103.4M 36.2% | -$261.8M -176.6% | $92.1M 40.7% | $715.4M 189.3% | -$2.74B -498.7% | -$58.4M -5.1% |
| Interest Expense | $28.8M 17.4% | $29.0M 15.0% | $36.5M 16.5% | $5.4M 1.5% | $400K 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.3M 1.4% | $2.1M 1.1% | $1.2M 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $18.5M 11.2% | -$20.1M -10.4% | -$20.6M -9.3% | -$133.6M -37.2% | -$131.7M -46.2% | $32.1M 21.7% | $49.6M 21.9% | -$184.7M -48.9% | $831.0M 151.0% | $373.3M 32.5% |
| Pretax Income | $11.9M 7.2% | -$31.9M -16.4% | -$3.0M -1.4% | $18.5M 5.2% | -$28.3M -9.9% | -$229.7M -154.9% | $141.8M 62.6% | $530.7M 140.4% | -$1.91B -347.7% | $314.9M 27.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $95.8M 42.3% | -$5.0M -1.3% | $9.1M 1.7% | -$1.1M -0.1% |
| Net Income | $11.9M 7.2% | -$31.9M -16.4% | -$3.0M -1.4% | $18.5M 5.2% | -$28.3M -9.9% | -$229.7M -154.9% | $46.0M 20.3% | $535.7M 141.7% | -$1.92B -349.4% | $316.0M 27.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.24 | $-3.90 | $-0.92 | $1.14 | $-1.74 | $-14.18 | $0.29 | $3.67 | $-18.66 | $3.40 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.24 | $-3.90 | $-0.92 | $1.12 | $-1.74 | $-14.18 | $0.29 | $3.65 | $-18.66 | $2.93 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.5M | 16.5M | 16.4M | 16.3M | 16.3M | 16.2M | 157.0M | 132.8M | 107.5M | 83.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 16.5M | 16.5M | 16.4M | 16.5M | 16.3M | 16.2M | 157.3M | 133.6M | 107.5M | 108.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 17th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 29.5 | 27.4 | 12.4 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 8.6 | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Operating Income | 189.3 | 40.7 | -176.6 | 36.2 | 42.4 | 8.0 | -6.1 | -4.0 |
| Income Tax | -1.3 | 42.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | 141.7 | 20.3 | -154.9 | -9.9 | 5.2 | -1.4 | -16.4 | 7.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BATL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.5B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $544.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.1B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $200.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $165.9B | 20.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $126.2B | 31.3× | 10.8× | 0.9× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $124.6B | 53.3× | 23.6× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $116.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| EQNR | $110.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| PSX | $107.4B | 24.5× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| WMB | $86.6B | 33.1× | 17.6× | 7.2× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $83.3B | — | 12.5× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $78.7B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $78.2B | 22.3× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.7B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $68.4B | 22.4× | 14.0× | 4.0× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.1B | 33.5× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| LNG | $58.8B | 11.1× | 7.7× | 2.9× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| MPLX | $58.7B | — | — | 4.5× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.9× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| OKE | $58.4B | 17.1× | 12.4× | 1.7× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| BKR | $55.9B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $55.4B | 34.0× | 11.1× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| BATL | $20M | — | — | 0.1× | -14.4% | — | 7.2% | -36.2% | 7.0% | — | 39 |
Peers = companies sharing BATL's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.