Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $194.82 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 16.9%/yr for a decade (off $75M normalized FCF).
The market's 16.9% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt $140M
mean 14.3% · volatility σ 130% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 16.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (130%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
8/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 5% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $3M dividends + $0 buybacks = $3M returned on $69M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
No trend data available for this metric.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $675.5M 100.0% | $534.8M 100.0% | $639.8M 100.0% | $654.2M 100.0% | $543.5M 100.0% | $465.8M 100.0% | $492.4M 100.0% | $548.2M 100.0% | $491.6M 100.0% | $500.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $411.0M 60.9% | $332.4M 62.2% | $424.0M 66.3% | $470.8M 72.0% | $409.1M 75.3% | $346.0M 74.3% | $382.4M 77.7% | $408.9M 74.6% | $389.3M 79.2% | $400.2M 80.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $389.6M 79.2% | $400.2M 80.0% |
| Gross Profit | $264.4M 39.1% | $202.4M 37.8% | $215.8M 33.7% | $183.5M 28.0% | $134.4M 24.7% | $119.7M 25.7% | $110.0M 22.3% | $139.3M 25.4% | $102.3M 20.8% | $99.9M 20.0% |
| Research & Development | $30.9M 4.6% | $23.6M 4.4% | $22.5M 3.5% | $20.2M 3.1% | $21.9M 4.0% | $23.6M 5.1% | $26.9M 5.5% | $29.5M 5.4% | $28.8M 5.9% | $26.7M 5.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $125.8M 18.6% | $110.6M 20.7% | $99.1M 15.5% | $92.3M 14.1% | $86.6M 15.9% | $78.7M 16.9% | $77.4M 15.7% | $82.6M 15.1% | $84.7M 17.2% | $71.0M 14.2% |
| Operating Income | $111.0M 16.4% | $64.3M 12.0% | $88.0M 13.8% | $65.1M 10.0% | $31.3M 5.8% | $18.7M 4.0% | -$1.6M -0.3% | $26.9M 4.9% | $17.4M 3.5% | -$76.5M -15.3% |
| Interest Expense | $14.8M 2.2% | $4.1M 0.8% | $2.9M 0.4% | $3.4M 0.5% | $3.5M 0.7% | $4.7M 1.0% | $5.4M 1.1% | $5.3M 1.0% | $6.8M 1.4% | $6.7M 1.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $10.9M 1.6% | -$3.2M -0.6% | -$2.8M -0.4% | -$2.7M -0.4% | -$388K -0.1% | -$1.8M -0.4% | -$259K -0.1% | $2.0M 0.4% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $95.0M 14.1% | $61.8M 11.6% | $83.3M 13.0% | $59.1M 9.0% | $27.3M 5.0% | $12.1M 2.6% | -$7.3M -1.5% | $23.6M 4.3% | $9.6M 2.0% | -$82.6M -16.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $20.9M 3.1% | $12.6M 2.4% | $9.5M 1.5% | $6.4M 1.0% | $2.5M 0.5% | -$659K -0.1% | $1.4M 0.3% | $2.9M 0.5% | $21.5M 4.4% | -$17.7M -3.5% |
| Net Income | $74.1M 11.0% | $49.2M 9.2% | $73.8M 11.5% | $52.7M 8.1% | $24.8M 4.6% | $12.8M 2.7% | -$8.7M -1.8% | $20.7M 3.8% | -$11.9M -2.4% | -$64.8M -13.0% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 74.6 | 77.7 | 74.3 | 75.3 | 72.0 | 66.3 | 62.2 | 60.9 |
| Gross Profit | 25.4 | 22.3 | 25.7 | 24.7 | 28.0 | 33.7 | 37.8 | 39.1 |
| R&D | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| SG&A | 15.1 | 15.7 | 16.9 | 15.9 | 14.1 | 15.5 | 20.7 | 18.6 |
| Operating Income | 4.9 | -0.3 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 10.0 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 16.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.5 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 3.1 |
| Net Income | 3.8 | -1.8 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 9.2 | 11.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BELFA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $58M covers the $3M due within a year 21.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2014-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~7.5% on $198M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| BELFA | $2.8B | — | 21.5× | 4.2× | 26.3% | 39.1% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 9.9% | 1.4× | 93 |
Peers = companies sharing BELFA's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.