Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 326 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $47.57 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.2%/yr for a decade (off $268M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.2% is more conservative than its 2-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.10B shares · net debt $676M
mean 39.4% · volatility σ 21% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied 8.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (21%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $430M buybacks = $430M returned on $346M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~2.1% on $914M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.46B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $1.06B 100.0% | $642.0M 100.0% | $238.3M 100.0% | $157.6M 100.0% | $108.4M 100.0% | $64.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $272.1M 18.6% | $234.6M 18.2% | $194.0M 18.3% | $145.0M 22.6% | $61.8M 25.9% | $39.1M 24.8% | $29.9M 27.6% | $19.4M 29.9% |
| Gross Profit | $1.19B 81.4% | $1.06B 81.8% | $864.5M 81.7% | $497.0M 77.4% | $176.5M 74.1% | $118.5M 75.2% | $78.4M 72.4% | $45.5M 70.1% |
| Research & Development | $340.1M 23.3% | $336.8M 26.1% | $314.6M 29.7% | $219.8M 34.2% | $89.5M 37.6% | $53.0M 33.6% | $28.9M 26.7% | $18.0M 27.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $281.9M 19.3% | $277.7M 21.5% | $249.1M 23.5% | $221.0M 34.4% | $128.1M 53.8% | $53.5M 33.9% | $29.2M 26.9% | $16.0M 24.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.27B 86.9% | $1.23B 95.3% | $1.16B 109.6% | $813.8M 126.8% | $290.4M 121.9% | $152.7M 96.9% | $88.2M 81.4% | $53.3M 82.2% |
| Operating Income | -$80.6M -5.5% | -$174.2M -13.5% | -$295.8M -27.9% | -$316.8M -49.4% | -$114.0M -47.8% | -$34.2M -21.7% | -$9.8M -9.0% | -$7.8M -12.1% |
| Interest Expense | — | $19.2M 1.5% | $15.2M 1.4% | $9.4M 1.5% | $28.2M 11.8% | $229K 0.1% | $825K 0.8% | $427K 0.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | $122.3M 9.5% | $91.3M 8.6% | $6.7M 1.0% | $3.0M 1.3% | $4.1M 2.6% | $3.2M 3.0% | $1.1M 1.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $111.0M 7.6% | $147.8M 11.5% | $72.9M 6.9% | -$13.9M -2.2% | -$25.4M -10.6% | $3.2M 2.0% | $2.3M 2.2% | $632K 1.0% |
| Pretax Income | $30.4M 2.1% | -$26.3M -2.0% | -$222.9M -21.1% | -$330.7M -51.5% | -$139.3M -58.5% | -$31.0M -19.7% | -$7.5M -6.9% | -$7.2M -11.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6.6M 0.5% | $2.6M 0.2% | $808K 0.1% | -$4.3M -0.7% | -$40.6M -17.0% | $53K 0.0% | -$156K -0.1% | $10K 0.0% |
| Net Income | $23.8M 1.6% | -$28.9M -2.2% | -$223.7M -21.1% | -$326.4M -50.8% | -$98.7M -41.4% | -$31.1M -19.7% | -$7.3M -6.8% | -$7.2M -11.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.23 | $-0.27 | $-2.11 | $-3.21 | $-1.19 | $-0.70 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.27 | $-2.11 | $-3.21 | $-1.19 | $-0.70 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 103.6M | 106.1M | 106.0M | 101.8M | 82.8M | 44.1M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 103.9M | 106.1M | 106.0M | 101.8M | 82.8M | 44.1M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 17th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 29.9 | 27.6 | 24.8 | 25.9 | 22.6 | 18.3 | 18.2 | 18.6 |
| Gross Profit | 70.1 | 72.4 | 75.2 | 74.1 | 77.4 | 81.7 | 81.8 | 81.4 |
| R&D | 27.7 | 26.7 | 33.6 | 37.6 | 34.2 | 29.7 | 26.1 | 23.3 |
| SG&A | 24.7 | 26.9 | 33.9 | 53.8 | 34.4 | 23.5 | 21.5 | 19.3 |
| Operating Income | -12.1 | -9.0 | -21.7 | -47.8 | -49.4 | -27.9 | -13.5 | -5.5 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -17.0 | -0.7 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | -11.1 | -6.8 | -19.7 | -41.4 | -50.8 | -21.1 | -2.2 | 1.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BILL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| BILL | $4.9B | — | — | 3.4× | 13.4% | 81.4% | 1.6% | 0.6% | 0.4% | -32.3× | 326 |
Peers = companies sharing BILL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.