Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 989 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $164.31 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.4%/yr for a decade (off $970M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.4% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares · net debt $2.7B
mean 17.0% · volatility σ 34% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied 9.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (34%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 36% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $402M dividends + $135M buybacks = $537M returned on $1.1B FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 13%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $562M covers the $500M due within a year 1.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.2% on $3.3B of debt.
Cash of $562M fully covers short-term debt of $499M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.89B 100.0% | $6.51B 100.0% | $6.06B 100.0% | $5.71B 100.0% | $4.99B 100.0% | $4.53B 100.0% | $4.36B 100.0% | $4.33B 100.0% | $4.14B 100.0% | $2.90B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.75B 69.0% | $4.57B 70.3% | $4.28B 70.5% | $4.12B 72.1% | $3.57B 71.5% | $3.27B 72.1% | $3.13B 71.8% | $3.17B 73.2% | $3.11B 75.1% | $1.98B 68.2% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | $1.42B 28.5% | $1.26B 27.9% | $1.23B 28.2% | $1.16B 26.8% | $1.03B 24.9% | $921.2M 31.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $948.2M 13.8% | $916.8M 14.1% | $849.0M 14.0% | $832.3M 14.6% | $744.3M 14.9% | $639.0M 14.1% | $577.5M 13.2% | $564.5M 13.0% | $500.7M 12.1% | $420.9M 14.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $5.70B 82.7% | $5.49B 84.4% | $5.12B 84.6% | $4.95B 86.7% | $4.32B 86.4% | $3.90B 86.2% | $3.71B 85.0% | $3.73B 86.2% | $3.61B 87.1% | $2.40B 82.7% |
| Operating Income | $1.19B 17.3% | $1.02B 15.6% | $936.4M 15.4% | $759.9M 13.3% | $678.7M 13.6% | $624.9M 13.8% | $652.7M 15.0% | $598.1M 13.8% | $531.6M 12.8% | $500.3M 17.3% |
| Interest Expense | $135.8M 2.0% | $150.2M 2.3% | $143.7M 2.4% | $87.7M 1.5% | $57.5M 1.2% | $62.5M 1.4% | $45.9M 1.1% | $42.4M 1.0% | $44.7M 1.1% | $28.4M 1.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.6M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$7.1M -0.1% | -$1.7M -0.0% | -$6.0M -0.1% | -$3.0M -0.1% | $72.7M 1.5% | $13.4M 0.3% | -$3.7M -0.1% | -$1.5M -0.0% | $3.2M 0.1% | -$31.4M -1.1% |
| Pretax Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | $607.3M 13.9% | $561.0M 13.0% | $488.1M 11.8% | $468.9M 16.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $219.2M 3.2% | $179.3M 2.8% | $164.3M 2.7% | $133.1M 2.3% | $148.7M 3.0% | $117.0M 2.6% | $125.2M 2.9% | $133.1M 3.1% | $161.4M 3.9% | $161.4M 5.6% |
| Net Income | $839.5M 12.2% | $698.1M 10.7% | $630.6M 10.4% | $539.1M 9.4% | $547.5M 11.0% | $462.5M 10.2% | $482.1M 11.1% | $427.9M 9.9% | $326.8M 7.9% | $307.5M 10.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $7.17 | $5.93 | $5.36 | $4.62 | $4.73 | $4.03 | $4.16 | $3.66 | $2.77 | $2.60 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.10 | $5.86 | $5.30 | $4.55 | $4.65 | $3.95 | $4.06 | $3.56 | $2.70 | $2.53 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 117.1M | 117.7M | 117.7M | 116.7M | 115.7M | 114.7M | 115.9M | 116.8M | 118.0M | 118.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 118.3M | 119.1M | 119.0M | 118.5M | 117.8M | 117.0M | 118.8M | 120.4M | 120.8M | 121.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 43th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 73.2 | 71.8 | 72.1 | 71.5 | 72.1 | 70.5 | 70.3 | 69.0 |
| Gross Profit | 26.8 | 28.2 | 27.9 | 28.5 | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 13.0 | 13.2 | 14.1 | 14.9 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 | 13.8 |
| Operating Income | 13.8 | 15.0 | 13.8 | 13.6 | 13.3 | 15.4 | 15.6 | 17.3 |
| Income Tax | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | 9.9 | 11.1 | 10.2 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 12.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.91T | 44.6× | 34.3× | 11.8× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.61T | 71.2× | 63.6× | 25.2× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $835.4B | 193.4× | 197.6× | 24.1× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $504.6B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $426.7B | 42.3× | 35.8× | 7.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $367.3B | 64.9× | 34.6× | 3.2× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.6B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $329.4B | 48.0× | 37.9× | 11.6× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ARM | $259.6B | 287.0× | 223.6× | 52.8× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $248.2B | 71.8× | 62.7× | 27.6× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $232.8B | 32.1× | 25.2× | 5.6× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.5B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| BR | $19.6B | 23.5× | — | 2.8× | 5.9% | 31.0% | 12.2% | 31.6% | 14.2% | — | 989 |
Peers = companies sharing BR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.