Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 293 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $85.22 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.6%/yr for a decade (off $173M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.6% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt -$75M
mean 14.0% · volatility σ 60% · implied rate exceeded in 2/9 yrs
Central path = implied 9.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (60%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 30% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $46M dividends + $51M buybacks = $96M returned on $154M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 2%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $174M covers the $43M due within a year 4.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2014-07-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.8% on $100M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.51B 100.0% | $1.34B 100.0% | $1.33B 100.0% | $1.30B 100.0% | $1.14B 100.0% | $1.08B 100.0% | $1.16B 100.0% | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.11B 100.0% | $1.12B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $752.8M 49.7% | $653.5M 48.7% | $674.6M 50.6% | $670.5M 51.5% | $583.3M 51.0% | $552.7M 51.1% | $582.0M 50.1% | $585.6M 49.9% | $555.0M 49.9% | $561.9M 50.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $585.6M 49.9% | $555.0M 49.9% | $561.9M 50.1% |
| Gross Profit | $760.8M 50.3% | $687.9M 51.3% | $657.3M 49.4% | $631.6M 48.5% | $561.4M 49.0% | $528.6M 48.9% | $578.7M 49.9% | $588.3M 50.1% | $558.3M 50.1% | $558.8M 49.9% |
| Research & Development | $79.9M 5.3% | $67.7M 5.1% | $61.4M 4.6% | $58.5M 4.5% | $44.6M 3.9% | $40.7M 3.8% | $45.2M 3.9% | $45.3M 3.9% | $39.6M 3.6% | $35.8M 3.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $444.3M 29.4% | $376.7M 28.1% | $370.7M 27.8% | $380.0M 29.2% | $349.8M 30.6% | $336.1M 31.1% | $371.1M 32.0% | $390.3M 33.3% | $387.7M 34.8% | $405.1M 36.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $524.2M 34.6% | $444.5M 33.1% | $432.1M 32.4% | $438.5M 33.7% | $394.3M 34.4% | $390.5M 36.1% | $416.3M 35.9% | $435.6M 37.1% | $427.3M 38.4% | $440.9M 39.3% |
| Operating Income | $236.6M 15.6% | $243.4M 18.1% | $225.2M 16.9% | $193.0M 14.8% | $167.1M 14.6% | $138.0M 12.8% | $162.4M 14.0% | $152.7M 13.0% | $131.0M 11.8% | $117.9M 10.5% |
| Interest Expense | $4.7M 0.3% | $3.1M 0.2% | $3.5M 0.3% | $1.3M 0.1% | $437K 0.0% | $2.2M 0.2% | $2.8M 0.2% | $3.2M 0.3% | $5.5M 0.5% | $7.8M 0.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.2M 0.3% | $7.6M 0.6% | $4.0M 0.3% | $244K 0.0% | $4.3M 0.4% | $5.1M 0.5% | $5.0M 0.4% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $237.1M 15.7% | $247.8M 18.5% | $225.7M 16.9% | $192.0M 14.7% | $171.0M 14.9% | $140.9M 13.0% | $164.6M 14.2% | $152.0M 13.0% | $126.6M 11.4% | $109.3M 9.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $47.8M 3.2% | $50.6M 3.8% | $50.8M 3.8% | $42.0M 3.2% | $35.6M 3.1% | $28.3M 2.6% | $33.4M 2.9% | $61.0M 5.2% | $31.0M 2.8% | $29.2M 2.6% |
| Net Income | $189.3M 12.5% | $197.2M 14.7% | $174.9M 13.1% | $150.0M 11.5% | $129.7M 11.3% | $112.4M 10.4% | $131.3M 11.3% | $91.1M 7.8% | $95.6M 8.6% | $80.1M 7.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 47.6M | 48.1M | 49.6M | 51.3M | 52.0M | 52.8M | 52.6M | 51.7M | 51.1M | 50.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 48.1M | 48.5M | 49.9M | 51.7M | 52.4M | 53.2M | 53.3M | 52.5M | 52.0M | 50.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.9 | 50.1 | 51.1 | 51.0 | 51.5 | 50.6 | 48.7 | 49.7 |
| Gross Profit | 50.1 | 49.9 | 48.9 | 49.0 | 48.5 | 49.4 | 51.3 | 50.3 |
| R&D | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| SG&A | 33.3 | 32.0 | 31.1 | 30.6 | 29.2 | 27.8 | 28.1 | 29.4 |
| Operating Income | 13.0 | 14.0 | 12.8 | 14.6 | 14.8 | 16.9 | 18.1 | 15.6 |
| Income Tax | 5.2 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Net Income | 7.8 | 11.3 | 10.4 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 13.1 | 14.7 | 12.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BRC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $371.6B | 42.5× | 29.7× | 5.5× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.8B | 38.5× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $199.4B | 79.4× | 40.2× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.1× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $177.4B | 47.9× | 31.6× | 5.5× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $158.8B | 39.2× | — | 5.8× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.3B | 24.9× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $96.2B | 23.0× | 16.9× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $91.9B | 28.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| HWM | $90.7B | 60.9× | 39.9× | 11.0× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $83.0B | 36.5× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $79.8B | 45.0× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| BRC | $4.1B | — | 14.4× | 2.7× | 12.8% | 50.3% | 12.5% | 15.9% | 14.6% | 0.4× | 293 |
Peers = companies sharing BRC's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.