Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.19% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Top 15 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.2M 100.0% | $10.7M 100.0% | $8.1M 100.0% | $9.2M 100.0% | $6.7M 100.0% | $2.6M 100.0% | $4.3M 100.0% | $4.2M 100.0% | $2.0M 100.0% | $1.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $11.1M 78.1% | $7.0M 65.8% | $5.2M 64.5% | $7.7M 84.3% | $4.2M 62.6% | $1.8M 69.5% | $1.9M 44.8% | $2.0M 48.0% | $1.1M 54.4% | $773K 53.0% |
| Gross Profit | $3.1M 21.9% | $3.7M 34.2% | $2.9M 35.5% | $1.4M 15.7% | $2.5M 37.4% | $764K 29.8% | $2.3M 53.7% | $2.1M 50.6% | $890K 44.6% | $685K 47.0% |
| Research & Development | $128K 0.9% | $132K 1.2% | $115K 1.4% | $382K 4.2% | $245K 3.7% | $515K 20.1% | $538K 12.5% | $674K 15.9% | $575K 28.8% | $432K 29.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.2M 22.4% | $3.0M 28.4% | $2.7M 33.1% | $3.5M 38.7% | $2.2M 32.4% | $4.4M 170.6% | $6.9M 159.1% | $7.8M 184.5% | $9.5M 475.3% | $10.4M 714.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $6.5M 46.1% | $6.4M 60.1% | $5.7M 70.1% | $7.6M 82.7% | $4.6M 68.7% | $5.0M 193.7% | $7.5M 174.2% | $8.3M 196.6% | $9.8M 490.8% | $10.6M 729.0% |
| Operating Income | -$3.4M -24.2% | -$2.8M -25.9% | -$2.8M -34.6% | -$6.2M -67.9% | -$2.1M -31.3% | -$4.2M -163.9% | -$5.2M -120.4% | -$6.2M -145.9% | -$8.9M -446.2% | -$9.9M -682.0% |
| Interest Expense | $217K 1.5% | $52K 0.5% | $8K 0.1% | — | $128K 1.9% | $479K 18.7% | $1.2M 28.2% | $765K 18.1% | — | $251K 17.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | $830K 12.4% | $57K 2.2% | -$406K -9.4% | $1.1M 27.0% | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$3.0M -21.0% | -$2.8M -26.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$285K -2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | -$2.7M -19.0% | -$2.8M -26.4% | -$2.8M -34.7% | -$6.1M -67.0% | -$1.3M -18.9% | -$4.2M -161.7% | -$5.6M -129.9% | -$7.3M -172.9% | -$8.9M -446.2% | -$10.2M -699.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.17 | $-0.19 | $-0.21 | $-0.47 | $-0.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.17 | $-0.19 | $-0.21 | $-0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 15.8M | 14.7M | 13.4M | 12.9M | 12.1M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 15.8M | 14.7M | 13.4M | 12.9M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -56%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $325000 is below the $772000 due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.2% on $4M of debt.
Cash of $325000 is below short-term debt of $3M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| BRFH | $18M | — | — | 1.3× | 32.6% | 21.9% | -19.0% | -203% | -55.8% | -1.1× | 15 |
Peers = companies sharing BRFH's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 12th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 48.0 | 44.8 | 69.5 | 62.6 | 84.3 | 64.5 | 65.8 | 78.1 |
| Gross Profit | 50.6 | 53.7 | 29.8 | 37.4 | 15.7 | 35.5 | 34.2 | 21.9 |
| R&D | 15.9 | 12.5 | 20.1 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| SG&A | 184.5 | 159.1 | 170.6 | 32.4 | 38.7 | 33.1 | 28.4 | 22.4 |
| Operating Income | -145.9 | -120.4 | -163.9 | -31.3 | -67.9 | -34.6 | -25.9 | -24.2 |
| Income Tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.0 |
| Net Income | -172.9 | -129.9 | -161.7 | -18.9 | -67.0 | -34.7 | -26.4 | -19.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BRFH: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.