Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -4.14% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $12.08 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -13.6%/yr for a decade (off $83M normalized FCF).
The market's -13.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$30M
mean 4.8% · volatility σ 66% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied -13.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (66%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| CAL | $409M | — | 6.9× | 0.1× | 1.3% | 43.0% | -0.2% | -1.1% | -1.1% | — | 157 |
Peers = companies sharing CAL's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 24% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $9M dividends + $5M buybacks = $14M returned on $39M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.2% on $198M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 1962.9 | 59.5 | 62.8 | 55.8 | 56.7 | 55.2 | 55.1 | 57.0 |
| Gross Profit | 1352.2 | 40.5 | 37.2 | 44.2 | 43.3 | 44.8 | 44.9 | 43.0 |
| SG&A | 1218.3 | 36.5 | 42.0 | 36.3 | 36.0 | 37.7 | 39.1 | 42.0 |
| Operating Income | 0.5 | 3.6 | -22.9 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 5.5 | 0.2 |
| Income Tax | -0.3 | 0.6 | -3.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | -0.1 |
| Net Income | -6.4 | 2.2 | -20.7 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 3.9 | -0.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CAL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.76B 100.0% | $2.72B 100.0% | $2.82B 100.0% | $2.97B 100.0% | $2.78B 100.0% | $2.12B 100.0% | $2.92B 100.0% | $85.5M 100.0% | $85.1M 100.0% | $91.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.57B 57.0% | $1.50B 55.1% | $1.55B 55.2% | $1.68B 56.7% | $1.55B 55.8% | $1.33B 62.8% | $1.74B 59.5% | $1.68B 1962.9% | $1.62B 1899.5% | $1.52B 1659.9% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.68B 1962.9% | $1.62B 1899.5% | $1.52B 1659.9% |
| Gross Profit | $1.18B 43.0% | $1.22B 44.9% | $1.26B 44.8% | $1.28B 43.3% | $1.23B 44.2% | $787.0M 37.2% | $1.18B 40.5% | $1.16B 1352.2% | $1.17B 1372.9% | $1.06B 1161.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.16B 42.0% | $1.07B 39.1% | $1.06B 37.7% | $1.07B 36.0% | $1.01B 36.3% | $889.5M 42.0% | $1.07B 36.5% | $1.04B 1218.3% | $1.04B 1217.1% | $942.6M 1031.1% |
| Operating Income | $6.4M 0.2% | $149.9M 5.5% | $194.5M 6.9% | $214.3M 7.2% | $205.8M 7.4% | -$485.7M -22.9% | $103.8M 3.6% | $401K 0.5% | $127.7M 150.0% | $96.0M 105.0% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $18.3M 21.4% | $17.3M 20.4% | $13.7M 15.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $12.3M 14.4% | $12.3M 14.5% | $15.0M 16.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$130K -0.0% | -$741K -0.0% | $6.2M 0.2% | $13.0M 0.4% | $15.4M 0.6% | $16.8M 0.8% | $7.9M 0.3% | $12.3M 14.4% | $12.3M 14.5% | — |
| Pretax Income | -$12.2M -0.4% | $135.2M 5.0% | $181.3M 6.4% | $213.0M 7.2% | $189.2M 6.8% | -$517.1M -24.4% | $78.6M 2.7% | -$5.8M -6.7% | $122.7M 144.1% | $97.3M 106.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$2.3M -0.1% | $29.1M 1.1% | $9.5M 0.3% | $33.3M 1.1% | $51.1M 1.8% | -$78.1M -3.7% | $16.5M 0.6% | -$273K -0.3% | $35.5M 41.7% | $31.2M 34.1% |
| Net Income | -$9.9M -0.4% | $106.1M 3.9% | $171.8M 6.1% | $179.7M 6.1% | $138.2M 5.0% | -$439.1M -20.7% | $62.8M 2.2% | -$5.4M -6.4% | $87.2M 102.4% | $65.7M 71.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.21 | $3.10 | $4.80 | $4.98 | $3.59 | $-11.80 | $1.53 | $-0.13 | $2.03 | $1.52 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.21 | $3.09 | $4.80 | $4.92 | $3.56 | $-11.80 | $1.53 | $-0.13 | $2.02 | $1.52 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 32.5M | 33.4M | 34.1M | 34.9M | 36.7M | 37.2M | 39.8M | 41.8M | 42K | 42.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 32.5M | 33.5M | 34.2M | 35.4M | 37.1M | 37.2M | 39.9M | 41.8M | 42K | 42.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position