Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 443 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $14.44 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 19.5%/yr for a decade (off $119M normalized FCF).
The market's 19.5% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.15B shares · net debt $3.5B
mean -49.2% · volatility σ 260% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 19.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (260%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.81B 100.0% | $5.78B 100.0% | $6.08B 100.0% | $6.83B 100.0% | $6.34B 100.0% | $4.97B 100.0% | $5.53B 100.0% | $6.64B 100.0% | $6.18B 100.0% | $5.40B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.91B 84.5% | $4.64B 80.2% | $4.78B 78.6% | $5.21B 76.3% | $4.96B 78.2% | $3.90B 78.5% | $4.46B 80.8% | $4.67B 70.3% | $4.44B 71.8% | $4.30B 79.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4.43B 71.6% | $4.29B 79.4% |
| Gross Profit | $902.0M 15.5% | $1.14B 19.8% | $1.30B 21.4% | $1.62B 23.7% | $1.38B 21.8% | $1.07B 21.5% | $1.06B 19.2% | $1.97B 29.7% | $1.75B 28.2% | $1.10B 20.4% |
| Research & Development | $108.0M 1.9% | $109.0M 1.9% | $108.0M 1.8% | $118.0M 1.7% | $107.0M 1.7% | $93.0M 1.9% | $80.0M 1.4% | $82.0M 1.2% | $81.0M 1.3% | $81.0M 1.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $799.0M 13.8% | $598.0M 10.3% | $1.29B 21.2% | $710.0M 10.4% | $592.0M 9.3% | $527.0M 10.6% | $548.0M 9.9% | $657.0M 9.9% | $626.0M 10.1% | $946.0M 17.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $966.0M 16.6% | $823.0M 14.2% | $1.55B 25.5% | $844.0M 12.4% | $705.0M 11.1% | $700.0M 14.1% | $715.0M 12.9% | $788.0M 11.9% | $764.0M 12.4% | $1.20B 22.2% |
| Interest Expense | $269.0M 4.6% | $263.0M 4.5% | $208.0M 3.4% | $163.0M 2.4% | $185.0M 2.9% | $210.0M 4.2% | $208.0M 3.8% | $195.0M 2.9% | $214.0M 3.5% | $219.0M 4.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $26.0M 0.4% | $8.0M 0.1% | $91.0M 1.5% | $70.0M 1.0% | $163.0M 2.6% | $21.0M 0.4% | -$293.0M -5.3% | $162.0M 2.4% | $113.0M 1.8% | $267.0M 4.9% |
| Pretax Income | -$277.0M -4.8% | $106.0M 1.8% | -$318.0M -5.2% | $741.0M 10.8% | $676.0M 10.7% | $179.0M 3.6% | -$124.0M -2.2% | $1.16B 17.4% | $912.0M 14.8% | -$11.0M -0.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $109.0M 1.9% | $37.0M 0.6% | -$66.0M -1.1% | $163.0M 2.4% | $68.0M 1.1% | -$40.0M -0.8% | -$72.0M -1.3% | $159.0M 2.4% | $165.0M 2.7% | -$18.0M -0.3% |
| Net Income | -$386.0M -6.6% | $69.0M 1.2% | -$253.0M -4.2% | $578.0M 8.5% | $608.0M 9.6% | $219.0M 4.4% | -$52.0M -0.9% | $995.0M 15.0% | $746.0M 12.1% | $7.0M 0.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.57 | $0.46 | $-1.70 | $3.72 | $3.69 | $1.33 | $-0.32 | $5.62 | $4.04 | $0.04 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.57 | $0.46 | $-1.70 | $3.65 | $3.60 | $1.32 | $-0.32 | $5.45 | $3.91 | $0.04 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 150.2M | 149.5M | 148.9M | 155.4M | 164.9M | 164.7M | 164.8M | 177.0M | 184.8M | 181.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 150.2M | 150.2M | 148.9M | 158.3M | 168.7M | 166.3M | 164.8M | 182.6M | 191.0M | 183.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (153%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $78M dividends + $0 buybacks = $78M returned on $51M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~6.5% on $4.1B of debt.
Cash of $670M fully covers short-term debt of $42M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| CC | $2.2B | — | — | 0.4× | 0.4% | 15.5% | -6.6% | -154% | -8.8% | — | 443 |
Peers = companies sharing CC's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 54th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 70.3 | 80.8 | 78.5 | 78.2 | 76.3 | 78.6 | 80.2 | 84.5 |
| Gross Profit | 29.7 | 19.2 | 21.5 | 21.8 | 23.7 | 21.4 | 19.8 | 15.5 |
| R&D | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| SG&A | 9.9 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 9.3 | 10.4 | 21.2 | 10.3 | 13.8 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | -1.3 | -0.8 | 1.1 | 2.4 | -1.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 |
| Net Income | 15.0 | -0.9 | 4.4 | 9.6 | 8.5 | -4.2 | 1.2 | -6.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.