Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.00% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 131%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1M is below the $2M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 2 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.9M 100.0% | $7.8M 100.0% | $16.3M 100.0% | $26.4M 100.0% | $21.5M 100.0% | — | $16.7M 100.0% | — | $22.7M 100.0% | $20.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $15.3M 73.0% | $4.9M 62.9% | — | — | — | — | $7.5M 44.8% | — | $10.1M 44.3% | $1.2M 5.9% |
| Gross Profit | $5.7M 27.0% | $2.9M 37.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $719K 3.4% |
| Research & Development | — | — | $169K 1.0% | $804K 3.0% | $24K 0.1% | — | $3.4M 20.2% | — | $1.1M 4.8% | $0 0.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.4M 30.5% | $5.6M 72.3% | $7.0M 42.9% | $8.4M 31.7% | $8.8M 40.7% | — | $10.9M 65.1% | — | $15.0M 66.0% | $3.2M 15.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $7.8M 37.4% | $6.2M 79.6% | $18.5M 113.6% | $28.2M 106.8% | $20.9M 97.4% | — | $23.5M 140.6% | — | $28.5M 125.3% | $13.6M 65.5% |
| Operating Income | -$2.2M -10.4% | -$3.3M -42.5% | -$2.2M -13.6% | -$1.8M -6.8% | $565K 2.6% | — | -$6.8M -40.6% | — | -$5.8M -25.3% | $7.2M 34.5% |
| Interest Expense | $692K 3.3% | $703K 9.1% | $477K 2.9% | $155K 0.6% | $34K 0.2% | — | $134K 0.8% | — | $0 0.0% | $814K 3.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $6.8M 32.3% | -$699K -9.0% | $109K 0.7% | $121K 0.5% | $4.6M 21.3% | — | -$417K -2.5% | — | $3.6M 15.9% | $0 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $4.6M 22.0% | -$4.0M -51.6% | -$2.1M -12.9% | -$1.7M -6.4% | $5.2M 24.0% | — | -$7.2M -43.1% | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $275K 1.3% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | -$92K -0.3% | $342K 1.6% | — | $0 0.0% | — | $29K 0.1% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | $4.5M 21.5% | -$4.2M -53.6% | -$2.1M -12.9% | -$1.6M -6.0% | $4.8M 22.4% | — | -$7.2M -43.1% | — | -$2.1M -9.4% | $7.2M 34.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.02 | $-0.02 | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $-0.04 | $-0.04 | $0.00 | $0.05 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.02 | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $-0.04 | $-0.04 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 257.4M | 234.8M | 216.1M | 212.3M | 203.6M | 203.6M | 189.8M | 189.8M | 10.65B | 141.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 278.5M | 234.8M | 216.1M | 212.3M | 237.7M | 237.7M | 189.8M | 189.8M | 10.65B | 14.10B |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $858.2B | 39.4× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.1B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.1B | 28.9× | 24.8× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.5B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $298.3B | 26.4× | 17.4× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.9B | 22.4× | 15.0× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $117.4B | 17.0× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.7B | 33.0× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $70.0B | 19.0× | 10.2× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $69.7B | 33.1× | 19.4× | 3.4× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.6B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $43.2B | 20.8× | 14.5× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| FMX | $41.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| ADM | $41.1B | 38.1× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| JBS | $40.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.9B | 39.7× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.4B | 21.1× | 9.6× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| HSY | $34.6B | — | 20.3× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $34.4B | — | 782.5× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.6× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.1B | 18.0× | 8.0× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.2B | 31.6× | 18.9× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| CHUC | $42M | 7.7× | — | 2.0× | 169% | 27.0% | 21.5% | 131% | 131% | — | 2 |
Peers = companies sharing CHUC's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 22th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | 44.8 | — | — | — | — | 62.9 | 73.0 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.1 | 27.0 |
| R&D | — | 20.2 | — | 0.1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | — | — |
| SG&A | — | 65.1 | — | 40.7 | 31.7 | 42.9 | 72.3 | 30.5 |
| Operating Income | — | -40.6 | — | 2.6 | -6.8 | -13.6 | -42.5 | -10.4 |
| Income Tax | — | 0.0 | — | 1.6 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Net Income | — | -43.1 | — | 22.4 | -6.0 | -12.9 | -53.6 | 21.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CHUC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.