Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.15% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $37.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.9%/yr for a decade (off $22M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.9% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$54M
mean 16.7% · volatility σ 52% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 6.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (52%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (142%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $27M dividends + $0 buybacks = $27M returned on $19M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.3M 100.0% | $145.9M 100.0% | $161.3M 100.0% | $166.6M 100.0% | $140.8M 100.0% | $114.5M 100.0% | $124.2M 100.0% | $118.2M 100.0% | $112.0M 100.0% | $108.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $110.1M 69.6% | $104.6M 71.7% | $112.1M 69.5% | $117.8M 70.7% | $98.1M 69.6% | $81.7M 71.3% | $85.3M 68.6% | $79.9M 67.6% | $77.2M 68.9% | $73.8M 67.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $77.2M 68.9% | $73.8M 67.7% |
| Gross Profit | $48.2M 30.4% | $41.4M 28.3% | $49.2M 30.5% | $48.8M 29.3% | $42.7M 30.4% | $32.8M 28.7% | $39.0M 31.4% | $38.3M 32.4% | $34.8M 31.1% | $35.2M 32.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $25.6M 16.2% | $24.3M 16.7% | $23.8M 14.7% | $23.4M 14.0% | $22.2M 15.8% | $21.0M 18.4% | $21.3M 17.1% | $20.5M 17.3% | $19.6M 17.5% | $19.6M 18.0% |
| Operating Income | $22.6M 14.3% | $17.0M 11.7% | $25.4M 15.8% | $25.4M 15.3% | $20.5M 14.6% | $11.8M 10.3% | $17.7M 14.2% | $17.8M 15.1% | $15.2M 13.6% | $15.6M 14.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.7M 2.3% | $1.9M 1.7% | $390K 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $25.8M 16.3% | $21.7M 14.9% | $29.6M 18.4% | $27.3M 16.4% | $21.7M 15.4% | $13.5M 11.8% | $20.9M 16.9% | $20.5M 17.3% | $17.2M 15.3% | $16.0M 14.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6.4M 4.0% | $5.2M 3.5% | $7.0M 4.3% | $6.4M 3.9% | $5.2M 3.7% | $3.2M 2.8% | $4.9M 4.0% | $5.2M 4.4% | $4.0M 3.5% | $5.5M 5.1% |
| Net Income | $19.5M 12.3% | $16.6M 11.4% | $22.6M 14.0% | $20.9M 12.5% | $16.6M 11.8% | $10.3M 9.0% | $16.0M 12.9% | $15.3M 13.0% | $13.2M 11.8% | $10.5M 9.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.58 | $1.35 | $1.84 | $1.69 | $1.34 | $0.83 | $1.29 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.58 | $1.35 | $1.84 | $1.69 | $1.34 | $0.83 | $1.29 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.4M | 12.4M | 12.4M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.3M | 12.4M | 12.4M | 12.4M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $28.75T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $364.2B | 41.6× | 29.1× | 5.4× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.2B | 38.4× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $264.2B | 39.7× | 18.8× | 3.0× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $204.4B | 81.4× | 41.0× | 2.3× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $181.0B | 36.2× | — | 4.0× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $174.3B | 47.1× | 31.1× | 5.4× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $166.7B | 23.4× | 16.0× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $154.3B | 38.1× | — | 5.6× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.9B | 28.2× | 16.2× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.0B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $117.9B | 33.9× | 26.6× | 5.9× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.7B | 25.0× | — | 5.0× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $97.3B | 23.3× | 17.1× | 1.9× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.0B | 32.5× | 23.2× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| PWR | $92.6B | 91.1× | 46.0× | 3.3× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| VRT | $91.6B | 70.2× | 43.4× | 8.9× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| JCI | $91.6B | 27.9× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $91.5B | 61.4× | 40.3× | 11.1× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $86.2B | 27.1× | 16.6× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.2B | 31.9× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $83.9B | 15.1× | 9.4× | 0.9× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $82.1B | 36.1× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $80.4B | 45.3× | 28.9× | 7.8× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| CIX | $447M | 23.0× | 15.0× | 2.8× | 8.5% | 30.4% | 12.3% | 14.1% | 14.1% | — | 43 |
Peers = companies sharing CIX's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 67.6 | 68.6 | 71.3 | 69.6 | 70.7 | 69.5 | 71.7 | 69.6 |
| Gross Profit | 32.4 | 31.4 | 28.7 | 30.4 | 29.3 | 30.5 | 28.3 | 30.4 |
| SG&A | 17.3 | 17.1 | 18.4 | 15.8 | 14.0 | 14.7 | 16.7 | 16.2 |
| Operating Income | 15.1 | 14.2 | 10.3 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 15.8 | 11.7 | 14.3 |
| Income Tax | 4.4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Net Income | 13.0 | 12.9 | 9.0 | 11.8 | 12.5 | 14.0 | 11.4 | 12.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CIX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.