Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.40% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
The answer is outside the range this solves over (-60% to +100%/yr), so it is reported as off the scale rather than as a rate. The price is below what this cash flow is worth even under collapse.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt -$220000
mean -175.6% · volatility σ 90% · implied rate exceeded in 0/2 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (90%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 9 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| CLRO | $9M | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3653% | 3653% | — | 9 |
Peers = companies sharing CLRO's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $0 | $18.7M 100.0% | $25.2M 100.0% | $29.0M 100.0% | $29.1M 100.0% | $25.0M 100.0% | $28.2M 100.0% | $41.8M 100.0% | $48.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $328K | $194K | $12.3M 66.0% | $15.7M 62.5% | $17.1M 58.9% | $16.5M 56.8% | $13.8M 55.3% | $14.8M 52.5% | $17.8M 42.6% | $19.1M 39.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17.8M 42.6% | $19.1M 39.4% |
| Gross Profit | -$328K | -$194K | $6.4M 34.0% | $9.5M 37.5% | $11.9M 41.1% | $12.6M 43.2% | $11.2M 44.7% | $13.4M 47.5% | $24.0M 57.4% | $29.5M 60.6% |
| Research & Development | — | $3.3M | $3.7M 19.6% | $4.4M 17.4% | $5.8M 20.0% | $5.5M 19.0% | $5.8M 23.1% | $7.8M 27.8% | $9.3M 22.3% | $8.6M 17.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.5M | $1.2M | $4.6M 24.4% | $6.8M 26.9% | $6.9M 23.8% | $5.9M 20.2% | $6.0M 24.1% | $6.0M 21.1% | $7.2M 17.1% | $7.3M 15.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.1M | $1.9M | $13.1M 70.2% | $16.7M 66.2% | $19.4M 67.0% | $18.1M 62.4% | $19.8M 78.9% | $23.7M 84.2% | $40.2M 96.2% | $25.9M 53.3% |
| Operating Income | -$4.4M | -$2.1M | -$6.8M -36.2% | -$7.2M -28.7% | -$7.5M -25.9% | -$5.6M -19.2% | -$8.6M -34.2% | -$10.3M -36.7% | -$16.2M -38.7% | $3.6M 7.3% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $537K 2.9% | $420K 1.7% | $514K 1.8% | $436K 1.5% | $26K 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$117K | $155K | $7.2M 38.4% | $35.1M 139.3% | $32K 0.1% | $79K 0.3% | $236K 0.9% | $80K 0.3% | $300K 0.7% | $312K 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$4.5M | -$1.8M | -$126K -0.7% | $27.5M 108.9% | -$8.0M -27.5% | -$5.9M -20.4% | -$8.4M -33.4% | -$10.2M -36.4% | -$15.9M -38.0% | $3.9M 8.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $83K | $98K | $434K 2.3% | $6.9M 27.4% | -$283K -1.0% | -$6.4M -22.1% | $56K 0.2% | $6.4M 22.9% | -$1.7M -4.1% | $1.4M 2.9% |
| Net Income | -$26.1M | -$9.0M | -$560K -3.0% | $20.6M 81.6% | -$7.7M -26.6% | $505K 1.7% | -$8.4M -33.6% | -$16.7M -59.3% | -$14.2M -33.9% | $2.4M 5.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-14.77 | $-5.61 | $-0.02 | $0.86 | $-0.39 | $0.03 | $-0.51 | $-1.87 | $-1.65 | $0.27 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-14.77 | $-5.61 | $-0.02 | $0.83 | $-0.39 | $0.03 | $-0.51 | $-1.87 | $-1.65 | $0.26 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.8M | 1.6M | 24.0M | 23.9M | 19.9M | 17.3M | 16.6M | 8.9M | 8.6M | 9.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.8M | 1.6M | 24.0M | 25.2M | 19.9M | 17.3M | 16.6M | 8.9M | 8.6M | 9.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
0/5 of the 9 checks — 4 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 5 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 3653%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $220000 is below the $2M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 52.5 | 55.3 | 56.8 | 58.9 | 62.5 | 66.0 | — | — |
| Gross Profit | 47.5 | 44.7 | 43.2 | 41.1 | 37.5 | 34.0 | — | — |
| R&D | 27.8 | 23.1 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 17.4 | 19.6 | — | — |
| SG&A | 21.1 | 24.1 | 20.2 | 23.8 | 26.9 | 24.4 | — | — |
| Operating Income | -36.7 | -34.2 | -19.2 | -25.9 | -28.7 | -36.2 | — | — |
| Income Tax | 22.9 | 0.2 | -22.1 | -1.0 | 27.4 | 2.3 | — | — |
| Net Income | -59.3 | -33.6 | 1.7 | -26.6 | 81.6 | -3.0 | — | — |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CLRO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.