Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 476 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $67.10 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 3.0%/yr for a decade (off $542M normalized FCF).
The market's 3.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt $201M
mean 37.6% · volatility σ 258% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied 3.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (258%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 26% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $81M dividends + $199M buybacks = $280M returned on $312M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 5%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.0B covers the $2M due within a year 583.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-08-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~4.6% on $1.0B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $1.0B fully covers short-term debt of $44M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 86.6 | 86.2 | 82.7 | 83.6 | 79.2 | 79.4 | 82.9 | 84.4 |
| SG&A | 8.6 | 7.9 | 9.3 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 7.3 | 8.4 | 9.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | 3.0 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 13.7 | 9.8 | 6.1 | 1.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CMC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.80B 100.0% | $7.93B 100.0% | $8.80B 100.0% | $8.91B 100.0% | $6.73B 100.0% | $5.48B 100.0% | $5.83B 100.0% | $4.64B 100.0% | $3.84B 100.0% | $3.60B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $6.58B 84.4% | $6.57B 82.9% | $6.99B 79.4% | $7.06B 79.2% | $5.62B 83.6% | $4.53B 82.7% | $5.03B 86.2% | $4.02B 86.6% | $3.32B 86.4% | $3.02B 84.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4.02B 104.7% | $3.58B 99.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $700.2M 9.0% | $668.4M 8.4% | $646.0M 7.3% | $545.0M 6.1% | $505.1M 7.5% | $507.0M 9.3% | $463.3M 7.9% | $401.5M 8.6% | $387.4M 10.1% | $383.7M 10.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $7.69B 98.6% | $7.29B 92.0% | $7.68B 87.2% | $7.40B 83.0% | $6.20B 92.1% | $5.11B 93.2% | $5.56B 95.4% | $4.48B 96.4% | $3.78B 98.3% | $3.52B 97.9% |
| Interest Expense | — | $47.9M 0.6% | $40.1M 0.5% | $50.7M 0.6% | $51.9M 0.8% | $61.8M 1.1% | $71.4M 1.2% | $41.0M 0.9% | $44.2M 1.1% | $63.0M 1.8% |
| Pretax Income | $107.5M 1.4% | $635.7M 8.0% | $1.12B 12.8% | $1.52B 17.0% | $534.0M 7.9% | $370.8M 6.8% | $268.5M 4.6% | $165.4M 3.6% | $65.5M 1.7% | $76.0M 2.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $22.9M 0.3% | $150.2M 1.9% | $262.2M 3.0% | $297.9M 3.3% | $121.2M 1.8% | $92.5M 1.7% | $69.7M 1.2% | $30.1M 0.6% | $15.3M 0.4% | $14.0M 0.4% |
| Net Income | $84.7M 1.1% | $485.5M 6.1% | $859.8M 9.8% | $1.22B 13.7% | $412.9M 6.1% | $279.5M 5.1% | $198.1M 3.4% | $138.5M 3.0% | $46.3M 1.2% | $54.8M 1.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.75 | $4.19 | $7.34 | $10.09 | $3.43 | $2.35 | $1.68 | $1.19 | $0.40 | $0.48 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.74 | $4.14 | $7.25 | $9.95 | $3.38 | $2.32 | $1.66 | $1.17 | $0.39 | $0.47 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 113.0M | 115.8M | 117.1M | 120.6M | 120.3M | 118.9M | 117.8M | 116.8M | 115.7M | 115.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 114.1M | 117.2M | 118.6M | 122.4M | 122.0M | 120.3M | 119.1M | 118.1M | 117.4M | 116.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $439.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 713 |
| LIN | $215.3B | 31.4× | 19.3× | 6.3× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| SCCO | $162.1B | 37.4× | 20.9× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.4% | 39.4% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| CX | $147.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 297 |
| TX | $116.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $101.8B | — | 12.3× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 16.0% | 22.0% | 14.7% | 1.1× | 1,775 |
| AEM | $100.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| SHW | $79.5B | 31.3× | — | 3.4× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| ECL | $76.6B | 37.3× | 22.5× | 4.8× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $73.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| WPM | $69.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| APD | $63.7B | — | 90.0× | 5.3× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $61.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| NUE | $61.2B | 35.3× | — | 1.9× | 5.7% | 11.9% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | — | 1,325 |
| CRH | $58.0B | 15.7× | 9.3× | 1.6× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| MT | $57.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 286 |
| DD | $53.6B | — | — | 7.8× | 1.9% | 34.5% | -11.4% | -5.6% | -5.6% | — | 1,172 |
| AU | $51.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $51.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| NTR | $37.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| STLD | $35.6B | 30.7× | 19.2× | 2.0× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| KGC | $34.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 630 |
| VMC | $31.9B | 30.1× | 15.3× | 4.0× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $29.8B | 26.3× | 16.9× | 4.8× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| PPG | $23.6B | 15.2× | — | 1.5× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.3% | — | 1,003 |
| CMC | $7.5B | 90.7× | — | 1.0× | -1.6% | 15.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 1.6% | — | 476 |
Peers = companies sharing CMC's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.