Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +5.81% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $158000 dividends + $0 buybacks = $158000 returned on -$17M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -70%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~38.5% on $118M of debt.
Cash of $40M fully covers short-term debt of $4M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 60.8 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 63.0 | 66.5 | 70.9 | 74.4 |
| Gross Profit | 39.2 | 36.8 | 36.8 | 36.8 | 37.0 | 33.5 | 29.1 | 25.6 |
| R&D | 9.4 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 8.8 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| SG&A | 20.0 | 19.1 | 19.0 | 19.2 | 23.6 | 21.8 | 22.8 | 28.7 |
| Operating Income | 6.1 | 6.2 | 2.5 | -11.7 | -6.9 | -2.7 | -14.8 | -27.8 |
| Income Tax | -0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | -0.3 | -0.8 | -0.7 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
| Net Income | 5.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | -12.6 | -6.8 | -4.9 | -18.5 | -31.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CMTL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $499.5M 100.0% | $540.4M 100.0% | $550.0M 100.0% | $486.2M 100.0% | $581.7M 100.0% | $616.7M 100.0% | $671.8M 100.0% | $570.6M 100.0% | $550.4M 100.0% | $411.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $371.7M 74.4% | $383.2M 70.9% | $365.5M 66.5% | $306.4M 63.0% | $367.7M 63.2% | $389.9M 63.2% | $424.4M 63.2% | $346.6M 60.8% | $332.2M 60.4% | $239.8M 58.3% |
| Gross Profit | $127.9M 25.6% | $157.2M 29.1% | $184.5M 33.5% | $179.8M 37.0% | $214.0M 36.8% | $226.8M 36.8% | $247.4M 36.8% | $223.9M 39.2% | $218.2M 39.6% | $171.2M 41.7% |
| Research & Development | $17.4M 3.5% | $24.1M 4.5% | $48.6M 8.8% | $52.5M 10.8% | $49.1M 8.4% | $52.2M 8.5% | $56.4M 8.4% | $53.9M 9.4% | $54.3M 9.9% | $42.2M 10.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $143.5M 28.7% | $123.2M 22.8% | $120.0M 21.8% | $114.9M 23.6% | $111.8M 19.2% | $117.1M 19.0% | $128.6M 19.1% | $113.9M 20.0% | $116.1M 21.1% | $94.9M 23.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $267.0M 53.4% | $237.1M 43.9% | $199.1M 36.2% | $213.6M 43.9% | $282.3M 48.5% | $211.7M 34.3% | $206.0M 30.7% | $188.9M 33.1% | $181.1M 32.9% | $171.8M 41.8% |
| Operating Income | -$139.1M -27.8% | -$79.9M -14.8% | -$14.7M -2.7% | -$33.8M -6.9% | -$68.3M -11.7% | $15.2M 2.5% | $41.4M 6.2% | $35.1M 6.1% | $37.0M 6.7% | -$576K -0.1% |
| Interest Expense | $45.6M 9.1% | $22.2M 4.1% | $15.0M 2.7% | $5.0M 1.0% | $6.8M 1.2% | $6.1M 1.0% | $9.2M 1.4% | $10.2M 1.8% | $11.6M 2.1% | $7.8M 1.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $68K 0.0% | $134K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$155K -0.0% | -$678K -0.1% | -$1.2M -0.2% | $703K 0.1% | $139K 0.0% | $190K 0.0% | -$35K -0.0% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$155.4M -31.1% | -$100.3M -18.6% | -$30.8M -5.6% | -$37.1M -7.6% | -$75.0M -12.9% | $9.3M 1.5% | $28.9M 4.3% | $24.6M 4.3% | $25.5M 4.6% | -$8.2M -2.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$80K -0.0% | -$295K -0.1% | -$3.9M -0.7% | -$4.0M -0.8% | -$1.5M -0.3% | $2.3M 0.4% | $3.9M 0.6% | -$5.1M -0.9% | $9.7M 1.8% | -$454K -0.1% |
| Net Income | -$155.3M -31.1% | -$100.0M -18.5% | -$26.9M -4.9% | -$33.1M -6.8% | -$73.5M -12.6% | $7.0M 1.1% | $25.0M 3.7% | $29.8M 5.2% | $15.8M 2.9% | -$7.7M -1.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-6.95 | $-4.70 | $-1.21 | $-1.63 | $-2.86 | $0.28 | $1.04 | $1.25 | $0.68 | $-0.46 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-6.95 | $-4.70 | $-1.21 | $-1.63 | $-2.86 | $0.28 | $1.03 | $1.24 | $0.67 | $-0.46 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 29.4M | 28.8M | 28.0M | 26.5M | 25.7M | 24.8M | 24.1M | 23.8M | 23.4M | 17.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 29.4M | 28.8M | 28.0M | 26.5M | 25.7M | 24.9M | 24.3M | 24.0M | 23.5M | 17.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| CMTL | $45M | — | — | 0.1× | -7.6% | 25.6% | -31.1% | -149% | -69.7% | -0.9× | 82 |
Peers = companies sharing CMTL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.