Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 2,450 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.3B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $545.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.2B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $202.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $166.8B | 21.0× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $128.7B | 31.9× | 11.0× | 1.0× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $127.5B | 54.5× | 24.1× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $117.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| PSX | $111.3B | 25.4× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| EQNR | $110.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| WMB | $87.7B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.1B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $79.0B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $77.9B | 22.2× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.5B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $69.7B | 22.9× | 14.2× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.2B | 33.6× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| MPLX | $59.4B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| LNG | $59.3B | 11.2× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| OKE | $58.7B | 17.2× | 12.4× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.8× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| BKR | $56.2B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $56.0B | 34.4× | 11.2× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
Peers = companies sharing COP's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.94B 100.0% | $54.74B 100.0% | $56.14B 100.0% | $78.49B 100.0% | $45.83B 100.0% | $18.78B 100.0% | $36.67B 100.0% | $38.73B 100.0% | $32.58B 100.0% | $24.36B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $22.32B 37.9% | $20.01B 36.6% | $21.98B 39.1% | $33.97B 43.3% | $18.16B 39.6% | $8.08B 43.0% | $11.84B 32.3% | $14.29B 36.9% | $12.47B 38.3% | $9.99B 41.0% |
| Research & Development | $78.0M 0.1% | $81.0M 0.1% | $81.0M 0.1% | $71.0M 0.1% | $62.0M 0.1% | $75.0M 0.4% | $82.0M 0.2% | $78.0M 0.2% | $100.0M 0.3% | $116.0M 0.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $893.0M 1.5% | $1.16B 2.1% | $705.0M 1.3% | $623.0M 0.8% | $719.0M 1.6% | $430.0M 2.3% | $556.0M 1.5% | $401.0M 1.0% | $427.0M 1.3% | $473.0M 1.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $29.89B 122.7% |
| Interest Expense | $1.18B 2.0% | $941.0M 1.7% | $824.0M 1.5% | $791.0M 1.0% | $887.0M 1.9% | $788.0M 4.2% | $799.0M 2.2% | $838.0M 2.2% | $1.11B 3.4% | $1.28B 5.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $311.0M 0.5% | $402.0M 0.7% | $412.0M 0.7% | $195.0M 0.2% | $33.0M 0.1% | $100.0M 0.5% | $166.0M 0.5% | $97.0M 0.3% | $112.0M 0.3% | $57.0M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$20.0M -0.0% | -$181.0M -0.3% | -$2.0M -0.0% | $47.0M 0.1% | -$102.0M -0.2% | -$13.0M -0.1% | $1.36B 3.7% | $173.0M 0.4% | $529.0M 1.6% | $255.0M 1.0% |
| Pretax Income | $12.66B 21.5% | $13.67B 25.0% | $16.29B 29.0% | $28.23B 36.0% | $12.71B 27.7% | -$3.14B -16.7% | $9.52B 26.0% | $9.97B 25.8% | -$2.62B -8.0% | -$5.53B -22.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.67B 7.9% | $4.43B 8.1% | $5.33B 9.5% | $9.55B 12.2% | $4.63B 10.1% | -$485.0M -2.6% | $2.27B 6.2% | $3.67B 9.5% | -$1.82B -5.6% | -$1.97B -8.1% |
| Net Income | $7.99B 13.6% | $9.24B 16.9% | $10.96B 19.5% | $18.68B 23.8% | $8.08B 17.6% | -$2.70B -14.4% | $7.19B 19.6% | $6.26B 16.2% | -$855.0M -2.6% | -$3.62B -14.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.36 | $7.82 | $9.08 | $14.62 | $6.09 | $-2.51 | $6.43 | $5.36 | $-0.70 | $-2.91 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.35 | $7.81 | $9.06 | $14.57 | $6.07 | $-2.51 | $6.40 | — | $-0.70 | $-2.91 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.25B | 1.18B | 1.20B | 1.27B | 1.32B | 1.08B | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.2M | 1.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.25B | 1.18B | 1.21B | 1.28B | 1.33B | 1.08B | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $4.0B dividends + $5.0B buybacks = $9.0B returned.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · -47%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $6.5B covers all $4.8B of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~115.3% on $1.0B of debt.
Cash of $6.5B fully covers short-term debt of $1.0B.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 95th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 36.9 | 32.3 | 43.0 | 39.6 | 43.3 | 39.1 | 36.6 | 37.9 |
| R&D | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| SG&A | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Income Tax | 9.5 | 6.2 | -2.6 | 10.1 | 12.2 | 9.5 | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Net Income | 16.2 | 19.6 | -14.4 | 17.6 | 23.8 | 19.5 | 16.9 | 13.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on COP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position