Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 277 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.22B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $1.05B 100.0% | $990.5M 100.0% | $996.8M 100.0% | $875.1M 100.0% | $789.6M 100.0% | $761.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $623.6M 51.0% | $614.5M 51.3% | $615.0M 52.6% | $565.2M 51.9% | $543.2M 51.9% | $535.6M 54.1% | $525.1M 52.7% | $449.8M 51.4% | $394.8M 50.0% | $375.1M 49.3% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $394.8M 50.0% | $375.1M 49.3% |
| Research & Development | $161.6M 13.2% | $158.2M 13.2% | $143.2M 12.2% | $137.9M 12.7% | $134.7M 12.9% | $122.8M 12.4% | $128.0M 12.8% | $124.0M 14.2% | $113.2M 14.3% | $98.7M 13.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $281.5M 23.0% | $258.3M 21.6% | $247.6M 21.2% | $238.0M 21.8% | $214.7M 20.5% | $198.3M 20.0% | $191.3M 19.2% | $169.3M 19.3% | $153.7M 19.5% | $140.5M 18.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.10B 90.3% | $1.07B 89.0% | $1.05B 89.4% | $1.01B 92.8% | $922.3M 88.1% | $885.0M 89.3% | $870.7M 87.3% | $770.1M 88.0% | $683.9M 86.6% | $628.3M 82.6% |
| Operating Income | $118.7M 9.7% | $131.3M 11.0% | $123.9M 10.6% | $78.7M 7.2% | $124.2M 11.9% | $105.6M 10.7% | $126.1M 12.7% | $104.9M 12.0% | $105.7M 13.4% | $132.6M 17.4% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17.7M 2.0% | $16.8M 2.1% | $16.3M 2.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $5.2M 0.4% | $8.7M 0.7% | $4.3M 0.4% | $877K 0.1% | $365K 0.0% | $1.2M 0.1% | $1.8M 0.2% | $2.6M 0.3% | $3.2M 0.4% | $2.5M 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$28.1M -2.3% | -$19.1M -1.6% | -$31.5M -2.7% | -$18.0M -1.6% | -$23.2M -2.2% | -$20.2M -2.0% | -$20.4M -2.0% | -$17.9M -2.1% | -$18.0M -2.3% | -$32.6M -4.3% |
| Pretax Income | $90.7M 7.4% | $112.3M 9.4% | $92.4M 7.9% | $60.8M 5.6% | $100.9M 9.6% | $85.4M 8.6% | $105.7M 10.6% | $87.0M 9.9% | $87.7M 11.1% | $100.0M 13.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $34.8M 2.8% | $25.4M 2.1% | $26.1M 2.2% | $16.7M 1.5% | $28.6M 2.7% | $26.6M 2.7% | $23.0M 2.3% | $20.9M 2.4% | $26.3M 3.3% | $37.1M 4.9% |
| Net Income | $55.9M 4.6% | $86.9M 7.3% | $66.2M 5.7% | $44.1M 4.0% | $72.3M 6.9% | $58.7M 5.9% | $82.8M 8.3% | $66.1M 7.6% | $61.4M 7.8% | $62.9M 8.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.02 | $3.06 | $2.21 | $1.42 | $2.28 | $1.83 | $2.58 | $2.04 | $1.89 | $2.03 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.98 | $3.03 | $2.20 | $1.41 | $2.26 | $1.82 | $2.55 | $2.01 | $1.87 | $1.90 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 27.7M | 28.3M | 29.9M | 31.0M | 31.8M | 32.0M | 32.1M | 32.5M | 32.4M | 31.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 28.2M | 28.7M | 30.1M | 31.3M | 32.0M | 32.3M | 32.5M | 32.9M | 32.9M | 33.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 26% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $37M dividends + $83M buybacks = $121M returned on $141M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · 7%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $180M covers the $0 due within a year 180011000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~4.9% on $360M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2018 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $180M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| CSGS | — | — | — | — | 2.2% | 49.0% | 4.6% | 19.7% | 6.8% | 3.9× | 277 |
Peers = companies sharing CSGS's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 51.4 | 52.7 | 54.1 | 51.9 | 51.9 | 52.6 | 51.3 | 51.0 |
| R&D | 14.2 | 12.8 | 12.4 | 12.9 | 12.7 | 12.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
| SG&A | 19.3 | 19.2 | 20.0 | 20.5 | 21.8 | 21.2 | 21.6 | 23.0 |
| Operating Income | 12.0 | 12.7 | 10.7 | 11.9 | 7.2 | 10.6 | 11.0 | 9.7 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| Net Income | 7.6 | 8.3 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 4.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CSGS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.