Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -97.84% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2024
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.00B 100.0% | $751.9M 100.0% | $591.7M 100.0% | $502.9M 100.0% | $464.4M 100.0% | $433.9M 100.0% | $343.2M 100.0% | $261.7M 100.0% | $216.6M 100.0% | $160.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $208.4M 20.8% | $156.1M 20.8% | $126.0M 21.3% | $93.3M 18.6% | $82.6M 17.8% | $62.6M 14.4% | $48.5M 14.1% | $41.8M 16.0% | $30.2M 13.9% | $22.7M 14.1% |
| Gross Profit | $792.4M 79.2% | $595.8M 79.2% | $465.7M 78.7% | $409.6M 81.4% | $381.9M 82.2% | $371.3M 85.6% | $294.7M 85.9% | $219.9M 84.0% | $186.5M 86.1% | $138.2M 85.9% |
| Research & Development | $243.1M 24.3% | $211.4M 28.1% | $190.3M 32.2% | $142.1M 28.3% | $95.4M 20.5% | $72.5M 16.7% | $57.1M 16.6% | $42.4M 16.2% | $34.6M 16.0% | $21.7M 13.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $141.1M 14.1% | $94.8M 12.6% | $82.5M 13.9% | $71.4M 14.2% | $60.4M 13.0% | $52.3M 12.1% | $42.0M 12.3% | $30.4M 11.6% | $22.1M 10.2% | $17.0M 10.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $865.2M 86.5% | $712.2M 94.7% | $618.1M 104.5% | $487.9M 97.0% | $375.9M 80.9% | $309.0M 71.2% | $247.4M 72.1% | $199.5M 76.2% | $150.5M 69.5% | $104.9M 65.3% |
| Operating Income | -$72.8M -7.3% | -$116.5M -15.5% | -$152.4M -25.8% | -$78.3M -15.6% | $6.0M 1.3% | $62.3M 14.4% | $47.3M 13.8% | $20.3M 7.8% | $36.0M 16.6% | $33.2M 20.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $56.8M 5.7% | $53.2M 7.1% | $15.4M 2.6% | -$13.0M -2.6% | -$6.4M -1.4% | $7.8M 1.8% | $4.6M 1.3% | $4.1M 1.6% | $245K 0.1% | -$1.5M -0.9% |
| Pretax Income | -$16.0M -1.6% | -$63.3M -8.4% | -$137.0M -23.2% | -$91.3M -18.2% | -$389K -0.1% | $70.1M 16.2% | $51.8M 15.1% | $24.4M 9.3% | $36.2M 16.7% | $31.7M 19.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $77.5M 7.7% | $3.2M 0.4% | -$6.7M -1.1% | -$7.4M -1.5% | $5.4M 1.2% | $7.0M 1.6% | $4.8M 1.4% | $8.4M 3.2% | $8.1M 3.7% | $5.9M 3.7% |
| Net Income | -$93.5M -9.3% | -$66.5M -8.8% | -$130.4M -22.0% | -$83.9M -16.7% | -$5.8M -1.2% | $63.1M 14.5% | $47.1M 13.7% | $16.0M 6.1% | $28.1M 13.0% | $25.8M 16.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.12 | $-1.60 | $-3.21 | $-2.12 | $-0.15 | $1.68 | $1.30 | $0.46 | $0.83 | $0.80 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.12 | $-1.60 | $-3.21 | $-2.12 | $-0.15 | $1.62 | $1.27 | $0.44 | $0.78 | $0.73 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 44.2M | 41.7M | 40.6M | 39.6M | 38.6M | 37.6M | 36.2M | 34.8M | 33.7M | 32.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 44.2M | 41.7M | 40.6M | 39.6M | 38.6M | 38.9M | 37.1M | 36.2M | 35.8M | 35.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $221M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2024 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 16.0 | 14.1 | 14.4 | 17.8 | 18.6 | 21.3 | 20.8 | 20.8 |
| Gross Profit | 84.0 | 85.9 | 85.6 | 82.2 | 81.4 | 78.7 | 79.2 | 79.2 |
| R&D | 16.2 | 16.6 | 16.7 | 20.5 | 28.3 | 32.2 | 28.1 | 24.3 |
| SG&A | 11.6 | 12.3 | 12.1 | 13.0 | 14.2 | 13.9 | 12.6 | 14.1 |
| Operating Income | 7.8 | 13.8 | 14.4 | 1.3 | -15.6 | -25.8 | -15.5 | -7.3 |
| Income Tax | 3.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | -1.5 | -1.1 | 0.4 | 7.7 |
| Net Income | 6.1 | 13.7 | 14.5 | -1.2 | -16.7 | -22.0 | -8.8 | -9.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CYBR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| CYBR | — | — | — | — | 33.1% | 79.2% | -9.3% | -3.9% | -3.9% | — | 3 |
Peers = companies sharing CYBR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.