Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,099 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
Peers = companies sharing DG's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $124.95 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 5.2%/yr for a decade (off $1.6B normalized FCF).
The market's 5.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.22B shares · net debt -$1.1B
mean 29.7% · volatility σ 67% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied 5.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (67%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $42.72B 100.0% | $40.61B 100.0% | $38.69B 100.0% | $37.84B 100.0% | $34.22B 100.0% | $33.75B 100.0% | $27.75B 100.0% | $25.63B 100.0% | $23.47B 100.0% | $21.99B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $29.62B 69.3% | $28.59B 70.4% | $26.97B 69.7% | $26.02B 68.8% | $23.41B 68.4% | $23.03B 68.2% | $19.26B 69.4% | $17.82B 69.5% | $16.25B 69.2% | $15.20B 69.2% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $16.25B 69.2% | $15.20B 69.2% |
| Gross Profit | $13.10B 30.7% | $12.02B 29.6% | $11.72B 30.3% | $11.82B 31.2% | $10.81B 31.6% | $10.72B 31.8% | $8.49B 30.6% | $7.80B 30.5% | $7.22B 30.8% | $6.78B 30.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $10.90B 25.5% | $10.30B 25.4% | $9.27B 24.0% | $8.49B 22.4% | $7.59B 22.2% | $7.16B 21.2% | $6.19B 22.3% | $5.69B 22.2% | $5.21B 22.2% | $4.72B 21.5% |
| Operating Income | $2.20B 5.2% | $1.71B 4.2% | $2.45B 6.3% | $3.33B 8.8% | $3.22B 9.4% | $3.55B 10.5% | $2.30B 8.3% | $2.12B 8.3% | $2.01B 8.6% | $2.06B 9.4% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $326.8M 0.8% | $211.3M 0.6% | $157.5M 0.5% | $150.4M 0.4% | $100.6M 0.4% | $99.9M 0.4% | $97.0M 0.4% | $97.8M 0.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$8.5M -0.0% | — | — | -$415K -0.0% | — | — | — | -$1.0M -0.0% | -$3.5M -0.0% | — |
| Pretax Income | $1.96B 4.6% | $1.44B 3.5% | $2.12B 5.5% | $3.12B 8.2% | $3.06B 9.0% | $3.40B 10.1% | $2.20B 7.9% | $2.02B 7.9% | $1.91B 8.1% | $1.97B 8.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $452.3M 1.1% | $314.5M 0.8% | $458.2M 1.2% | $700.6M 1.9% | $663.9M 1.9% | $749.3M 2.2% | $489.2M 1.8% | $425.9M 1.7% | $368.3M 1.6% | $714.5M 3.2% |
| Net Income | $1.51B 3.5% | $1.13B 2.8% | $1.66B 4.3% | $2.42B 6.4% | $2.40B 7.0% | $2.66B 7.9% | $1.71B 6.2% | $1.59B 6.2% | $1.54B 6.6% | $1.25B 5.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.87 | $5.12 | $7.57 | $10.73 | $10.24 | $10.70 | $6.68 | $5.99 | $5.64 | $4.45 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.85 | $5.11 | $7.55 | $10.68 | $10.17 | $10.62 | $6.64 | $5.97 | $5.63 | $4.43 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 220.1M | 219.9M | 219.4M | 225.1M | 234.3M | 248.2M | 256.6M | 265.2M | 272.8M | 281.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 220.8M | 220.0M | 219.9M | 226.3M | 235.8M | 250.1M | 258.1M | 266.1M | 273.4M | 282.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 22% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $520M dividends + $0 buybacks = $520M returned on $2.4B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.1B covers the $14M due within a year 79.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-01-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2025 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 69.5 | 69.4 | 68.2 | 68.4 | 68.8 | 69.7 | 70.4 | 69.3 |
| Gross Profit | 30.5 | 30.6 | 31.8 | 31.6 | 31.2 | 30.3 | 29.6 | 30.7 |
| SG&A | 22.2 | 22.3 | 21.2 | 22.2 | 22.4 | 24.0 | 25.4 | 25.5 |
| Operating Income | 8.3 | 8.3 | 10.5 | 9.4 | 8.8 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | 6.2 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 7.0 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 3.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DG: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.