Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 232 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $72.66 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 16.7%/yr for a decade (off $73M normalized FCF).
The market's 16.7% is in line with its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt $137M
mean -73.0% · volatility σ 287% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 16.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (287%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $7M buybacks = $7M returned on $105M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $22M covers the $22M due within a year 1.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-06-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.0% on $159M of debt.
Cash of $22M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $430.2M 100.0% | $424.0M 100.0% | $444.8M 100.0% | $388.2M 100.0% | $308.6M 100.0% | $279.3M 100.0% | $254.2M 100.0% | $226.9M 100.0% | $181.3M 100.0% | $203.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $159.5M 37.1% | $174.1M 41.1% | $192.6M 43.3% | $171.9M 44.3% | $142.0M 46.0% | $135.3M 48.4% | $135.2M 53.2% | $117.8M 51.9% | $94.1M 51.9% | $103.3M 50.9% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $85.4M 47.1% | $97.8M 48.2% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7.6M 4.2% | $4.7M 2.3% |
| Gross Profit | $270.7M 62.9% | $249.9M 58.9% | $252.2M 56.7% | $216.3M 55.7% | $166.7M 54.0% | $144.0M 51.6% | $119.0M 46.8% | $109.1M 48.1% | $87.2M 48.1% | $99.7M 49.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $58.9M 13.7% | $58.3M 13.7% | $61.8M 13.9% | $58.8M 15.1% | $41.8M 13.6% | $36.1M 12.9% | $25.7M 10.1% | $28.3M 12.5% | $13.3M 7.4% | $17.0M 8.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $214.4M 49.8% | $201.8M 47.6% | $202.1M 45.4% | $178.1M 45.9% | $156.1M 50.6% | $132.7M 47.5% | $109.0M 42.9% | $106.3M 46.8% | $78.4M 43.2% | $82.6M 40.7% |
| Operating Income | $56.3M 13.1% | $48.1M 11.3% | $50.1M 11.3% | $38.2M 9.8% | $10.5M 3.4% | $11.3M 4.1% | $10.1M 4.0% | $2.8M 1.2% | $8.9M 4.9% | $17.1M 8.4% |
| Interest Expense | $6.3M 1.5% | $15.4M 3.6% | $25.2M 5.7% | $19.7M 5.1% | $1.4M 0.4% | $3.6M 1.3% | $102K 0.0% | $25K 0.0% | $48K 0.0% | $291K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $11K 0.0% | $10K 0.0% | $304K 0.1% | $733K 0.3% | $445K 0.2% | $656K 0.4% | $545K 0.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$54K -0.0% | -$94K -0.0% | $59K 0.0% | $98K 0.0% | -$144K -0.0% | -$566K -0.2% | $442K 0.2% | $48K 0.0% | $76K 0.0% | -$669K -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $49.9M 11.6% | $22.9M 5.4% | $24.9M 5.6% | $18.6M 4.8% | $9.0M 2.9% | $7.5M 2.7% | $11.1M 4.4% | $3.3M 1.4% | $9.6M 5.3% | $16.7M 8.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $9.1M 2.1% | $353K 0.1% | $148K 0.0% | -$755K -0.2% | -$1.4M -0.4% | -$948K -0.3% | $1.2M 0.5% | $1.6M 0.7% | $147K 0.1% | $3.2M 1.6% |
| Net Income | $40.8M 9.5% | $22.5M 5.3% | $24.8M 5.6% | $19.4M 5.0% | $10.4M 3.4% | $8.4M 3.0% | $10.0M 3.9% | $1.6M 0.7% | $9.4M 5.2% | $16.7M 8.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.10 | $0.62 | $0.69 | $0.55 | $0.32 | $0.29 | $0.36 | $0.06 | $0.36 | $0.65 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.08 | $0.61 | $0.67 | $0.54 | $0.31 | $0.28 | $0.35 | $0.06 | $0.35 | $0.64 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 37.0M | 36.3M | 35.8M | 35.0M | 32.1M | 28.8M | 27.9M | 27.1M | 26.4M | 25.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 37.7M | 37.0M | 36.9M | 36.0M | 33.4M | 29.5M | 28.6M | 27.7M | 27.1M | 26.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 95th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 11.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 51.9 | 53.2 | 48.4 | 46.0 | 44.3 | 43.3 | 41.1 | 37.1 |
| Gross Profit | 48.1 | 46.8 | 51.6 | 54.0 | 55.7 | 56.7 | 58.9 | 62.9 |
| SG&A | 12.5 | 10.1 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 15.1 | 13.9 | 13.7 | 13.7 |
| Operating Income | 1.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 9.8 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 13.1 |
| Income Tax | 0.7 | 0.5 | -0.3 | -0.4 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | 0.7 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 9.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DGII: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| DGII | $2.7B | 67.3× | 31.3× | 6.2× | 1.5% | 62.9% | 9.5% | 6.4% | 5.1% | 1.8× | 232 |
Peers = companies sharing DGII's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.