Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 452 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $60.51 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.2%/yr for a decade (off $616M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.2% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.11B shares · net debt $300M
mean -7.6% · volatility σ 26% · implied rate exceeded in 2/5 yrs
Central path = implied 0.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (26%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 34% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $212M dividends + $563M buybacks = $775M returned on $619M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 12%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~5.4% on $646M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2024
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.00B 100.0% | $4.89B 100.0% | $4.58B 100.0% | $4.29B 100.0% | $4.17B 100.0% | $4.09B 100.0% | $3.97B 100.0% | $3.87B 100.0% | $3.72B 100.0% | $3.64B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.25B 64.9% | $3.16B 64.7% | $2.96B 64.6% | $2.81B 65.5% | $2.76B 66.1% | $2.65B 64.9% | $2.60B 65.3% | $2.51B 64.8% | $2.41B 64.8% | $2.35B 64.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $572.8M 11.4% | $570.7M 11.7% | $528.6M 11.5% | $487.3M 11.4% | $458.5M 11.0% | $492.5M 12.1% | $481.1M 12.1% | $472.8M 12.2% | $464.9M 12.5% | $440.1M 12.1% |
| Operating Income | $628.6M 12.6% | $654.0M 13.4% | $664.8M 14.5% | $598.7M 14.0% | $594.8M 14.3% | $569.7M 13.9% | $428.3M 10.8% | $517.3M 13.4% | $483.1M 13.0% | $515.9M 14.2% |
| Interest Expense | $34.9M 0.7% | $23.1M 0.5% | $16.9M 0.4% | $21.3M 0.5% | $10.4M 0.3% | $3.9M 0.1% | $2.8M 0.1% | $1.6M 0.0% | $1.7M 0.0% | $3.1M 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $17.5M 0.3% | $21.2M 0.4% | $7.8M 0.2% | $4.8M 0.1% | $4.2M 0.1% | $6.2M 0.2% | $6.6M 0.2% | $8.0M 0.2% | $6.8M 0.2% | $4.6M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$37.5M -0.7% | -$17.6M -0.4% | -$26.4M -0.6% | -$10.8M -0.3% | -$11.4M -0.3% | -$1.9M -0.0% | -$6.8M -0.2% | -$4.4M -0.1% | $1.6M 0.0% | -$2.5M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $591.1M 11.8% | $636.4M 13.0% | $648.4M 14.2% | $814.3M 19.0% | $583.3M 14.0% | $567.9M 13.9% | $421.5M 10.6% | $512.9M 13.3% | $484.7M 13.0% | $513.4M 14.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $94.8M 1.9% | $93.4M 1.9% | $98.9M 2.2% | $125.9M 2.9% | $85.5M 2.1% | $88.4M 2.2% | $67.1M 1.7% | $76.1M 2.0% | $75.4M 2.0% | $67.2M 1.8% |
| Net Income | $493.2M 9.9% | $540.7M 11.1% | $549.5M 12.0% | $688.4M 16.1% | $497.8M 11.9% | $479.4M 11.7% | $354.4M 8.9% | $436.8M 11.3% | $409.3M 11.0% | $446.2M 12.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.27 | $4.52 | $4.47 | $5.36 | $3.73 | $3.49 | $2.49 | $2.99 | $2.74 | $2.89 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.25 | $4.49 | $4.44 | $5.32 | $3.71 | $3.47 | $2.47 | $2.96 | $2.71 | $2.85 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 115.5M | 119.7M | 122.8M | 127.2M | 132.6M | 136.5M | 141.4M | 144.8M | 147.9M | 152.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | 118.5M | 121.9M | 128.0M | 133.2M | 137.2M | 142.6M | 146.3M | 149.9M | 155.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 33th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2024 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.8 | 65.3 | 64.9 | 66.1 | 65.5 | 64.6 | 64.7 | 64.9 |
| SG&A | 12.2 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 11.0 | 11.4 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 11.4 |
| Operating Income | 13.4 | 10.8 | 13.9 | 14.3 | 14.0 | 14.5 | 13.4 | 12.6 |
| Income Tax | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Net Income | 11.3 | 8.9 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 16.1 | 12.0 | 11.1 | 9.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DOX: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| DOX | $6.8B | 14.2× | 9.4× | 1.4× | 2.4% | 35.1% | 9.9% | 14.3% | 12.0% | 0.9× | 452 |
Peers = companies sharing DOX's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.