Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -0.91% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $546.1M 100.0% | $4.27B 100.0% | $5.53B 100.0% | $7.11B 100.0% | $9.17B 100.0% | $9.60B 100.0% | $7.28B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $476.1M 87.2% | $3.95B 92.4% | $4.85B 87.6% | $6.12B 86.1% | $8.08B 88.1% | $8.04B 83.7% | $6.09B 83.6% |
| Gross Profit | $70.0M 12.8% | $323.8M 7.6% | $684.0M 12.4% | $990.1M 13.9% | $1.09B 11.9% | $1.56B 16.3% | $1.20B 16.4% |
| Research & Development | $17.3M 3.2% | $181.7M 4.3% | $276.9M 5.0% | $383.1M 5.4% | $490.0M 5.3% | $416.3M 4.3% | $383.9M 5.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $19.7M 3.6% | $204.4M 4.8% | $237.8M 4.3% | $288.2M 4.1% | $376.0M 4.1% | $375.9M 3.9% | $446.1M 6.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $69.3M 12.7% | $897.4M 21.0% | $848.1M 15.3% | $1.19B 16.7% | $1.74B 19.0% | $1.30B 13.5% | $1.33B 18.2% |
| Operating Income | $680K 0.1% | -$573.6M -13.4% | -$164.0M -3.0% | -$198.9M -2.8% | -$648.7M -7.1% | $262.1M 2.7% | -$131.7M -1.8% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | $12.1M 0.1% | $145.2M 1.5% | $159.1M 2.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$9.6M -1.8% | $21.9M 0.5% | -$52.9M -1.0% | -$80.3M -1.1% | -$33.9M -0.4% | -$27.4M -0.3% | -$22.9M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $179K 0.0% | -$287.4M -6.7% | $68.2M 1.2% | -$149.3M -2.1% | -$605.1M -6.6% | $403.4M 4.2% | $36.6M 0.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.1M 0.7% | $15.4M 0.4% | $1.1M 0.0% | $3.5M 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$29.1M -5.3% | -$306.8M -7.2% | $35.5M 0.6% | -$75.4M -1.1% | -$581.9M -6.3% | $485.5M 5.1% | $39.8M 0.5% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.14 | $-9.95 | $1.11 | $-2.36 | $-17.88 | $15.19 | $1.32 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.14 | $-9.95 | $1.11 | $-2.36 | $-17.88 | $14.71 | $1.26 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 30.2M | 30.8M | 32.0M | 32.0M | 32.5M | 32.0M | 19.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 30.2M | 30.8M | 32.0M | 32.0M | 32.5M | 33.0M | 31.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $308M dividends + $0 buybacks = $308M returned on -$8M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 57th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 15.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 83.6 | 83.7 | 88.1 | 86.1 | 87.6 | 92.4 | 87.2 |
| Gross Profit | 16.4 | 16.3 | 11.9 | 13.9 | 12.4 | 7.6 | 12.8 |
| R&D | 5.3 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| SG&A | 6.1 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 3.6 |
| Operating Income | -1.8 | 2.7 | -7.1 | -2.8 | -3.0 | -13.4 | 0.1 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| Net Income | 0.5 | 5.1 | -6.3 | -1.1 | 0.6 | -7.2 | -5.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DOYU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 36 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 192 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $4.15T | 31.8× | 27.8× | 10.3× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.3× | 4,874 |
| META | $1.72T | 29.1× | 17.1× | 8.6× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| AMX | $1.40T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 318 |
| CHT | $354.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $318.0B | 29.8× | 23.7× | 7.0× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $239.2B | 12.0× | 6.4× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $204.2B | 11.9× | 4.2× | 1.5× | 2.5% | — | 12.4% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 0.0× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $200.2B | 15.4× | 10.3× | 2.1× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 1.8× | 2,883 |
| TMUS | $184.2B | 17.1× | 8.3× | 2.1× | 8.5% | — | 12.4% | 18.6% | 7.6% | 2.7× | 1,648 |
| T | $182.0B | 8.3× | 6.8× | 1.4× | 2.7% | — | 17.5% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 3.2× | 2,848 |
| VEON | $127.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| DASH | $83.1B | 91.3× | 53.5× | 6.1× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| WBD | $70.0B | 97.4× | 15.3× | 1.9× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 36.1× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| LYV | $39.6B | — | 25.1× | 1.6× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| TTWO | $39.0B | — | 424.4× | 5.9× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| TWLO | $37.5B | 1172.6× | 107.1× | 7.4× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.5B | 58.3× | 60.1× | 12.9× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| FOX | $26.9B | 11.9× | — | 1.6× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| OMC | $24.6B | — | 57.5× | 1.4× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| ROKU | $22.8B | 261.1× | 530.2× | 4.8× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| FWONA | $21.5B | — | 39.5× | 4.8× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 283 |
| NWS | $18.9B | 16.1× | — | 2.2× | 2.4% | — | 14.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | — | 304 |
| CHTR | $18.0B | 3.7× | 5.3× | 0.3× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TKO | $15.3B | 83.8× | 13.8× | 3.2× | -3.1% | — | 4.1% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.9× | 616 |
| DOYU | $140M | — | -116.5× | 0.3× | -6.7% | 12.8% | -0.8% | -1.5% | -1.5% | — | 35 |
Peers = companies sharing DOYU's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.