Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 757 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $297.65 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.1%/yr for a decade (off $556M normalized FCF).
The market's 6.1% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$111M
mean 22.1% · volatility σ 15% · implied rate exceeded in 6/7 yrs
Central path = implied 6.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (15%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 35% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $237M dividends + $358M buybacks = $595M returned on $672M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 15%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $126M covers the $6M due within a year 20.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-28 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~1333.1% on $15M of debt.
Cash of $126M fully covers short-term debt of $100000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.94B 100.0% | $4.71B 100.0% | $4.48B 100.0% | $4.54B 100.0% | — | $4.36B 100.0% | $4.12B 100.0% | $3.62B 100.0% | $3.43B 100.0% | $2.79B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.97B 60.0% | $2.86B 60.7% | $2.75B 61.4% | $2.89B 63.7% | — | $2.67B 61.3% | $2.52B 61.3% | $2.22B 61.2% | $2.13B 62.1% | $1.92B 68.9% |
| Gross Profit | $1.97B 40.0% | $1.85B 39.3% | $1.73B 38.6% | $1.65B 36.3% | — | $1.69B 38.7% | $1.59B 38.7% | $1.40B 38.8% | $1.30B 37.9% | $866.0M 31.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $464.1M 9.4% | $459.5M 9.8% | $434.6M 9.7% | $416.5M 9.2% | — | $428.3M 9.8% | $406.6M 9.9% | $382.3M 10.6% | $372.5M 10.8% | $344.8M 12.4% |
| Operating Income | $954.0M 19.3% | $879.0M 18.7% | $819.5M 18.3% | $767.9M 16.9% | $767.9M | $780.4M 17.9% | $725.6M 17.6% | $629.4M 17.4% | $571.7M 16.7% | $521.2M 18.7% |
| Interest Expense | $196.0M 4.0% | $195.9M 4.2% | $196.5M 4.4% | $198.3M 4.4% | $198.3M | $191.8M 4.4% | $172.2M 4.2% | $150.8M 4.2% | $146.3M 4.3% | $122.5M 4.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $14.9M 0.3% | $17.0M 0.4% | $11.7M 0.3% | $3.2M 0.1% | $3.2M | $345K 0.0% | $1.7M 0.0% | $4.0M 0.1% | $3.3M 0.1% | $1.5M 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $770.3M 15.6% | $722.2M 15.3% | $652.4M 14.6% | $572.8M 12.6% | $572.8M | $625.7M 14.4% | $555.1M 13.5% | $482.6M 13.3% | $428.7M 12.5% | $400.2M 14.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $168.6M 3.4% | $138.0M 2.9% | $133.3M 3.0% | $120.6M 2.7% | — | $115.2M 2.6% | $63.8M 1.6% | $81.9M 2.3% | $66.7M 1.9% | $122.2M 4.4% |
| Net Income | $601.7M 12.2% | $584.2M 12.4% | $519.1M 11.6% | $452.3M 10.0% | — | $510.5M 11.7% | $491.3M 11.9% | $400.7M 11.1% | $362.0M 10.5% | $277.9M 10.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $17.69 | $16.83 | $14.80 | $12.66 | — | $13.72 | $12.61 | $9.83 | $8.65 | $6.05 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $17.57 | $16.69 | $14.66 | $12.53 | — | $13.54 | $12.39 | $9.56 | $8.35 | $5.83 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 34.0M | 34.7M | 35.1M | 35.7M | — | 37.2M | 39.0M | 40.8M | 41.9M | 46.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 34.2M | 35.0M | 35.4M | 36.1M | — | 37.7M | 39.6M | 41.9M | 43.3M | 47.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 61.2 | 61.3 | 61.3 | — | 63.7 | 61.4 | 60.7 | 60.0 |
| Gross Profit | 38.8 | 38.7 | 38.7 | — | 36.3 | 38.6 | 39.3 | 40.0 |
| SG&A | 10.6 | 9.9 | 9.8 | — | 9.2 | 9.7 | 9.8 | 9.4 |
| Operating Income | 17.4 | 17.6 | 17.9 | — | 16.9 | 18.3 | 18.7 | 19.3 |
| Income Tax | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.6 | — | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.4 |
| Net Income | 11.1 | 11.9 | 11.7 | — | 10.0 | 11.6 | 12.4 | 12.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DPZ: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DPZ | $10.0B | 16.9× | — | 2.0× | 5.0% | 40.0% | 12.2% | -15.4% | -15.5% | — | 757 |
Peers = companies sharing DPZ's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.