Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.57% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
The answer is outside the range this solves over (-60% to +100%/yr), so it is reported as off the scale rather than as a rate. The price is below what this cash flow is worth even under collapse.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$191M
mean 4.8% · volatility σ 70% · implied rate exceeded in 4/5 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (70%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage flat year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $52M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 10%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2022 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $344.2M 100.0% | $289.2M 100.0% | $222.9M 100.0% | $197.2M 100.0% | $224.1M 100.0% | $165.3M 100.0% | $164.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $186.6M 54.2% | $157.2M 54.3% | $120.5M 54.0% | $116.7M 59.2% | $129.6M 57.8% | $88.3M 53.4% | $94.1M 57.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $50.2M 14.6% | $51.1M 17.7% | $45.3M 20.3% | $44.5M 22.5% | $46.9M 20.9% | $17.6M 10.7% | $19.8M 12.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $332.1M 96.5% | $285.8M 98.8% | $241.2M 108.2% | $246.4M 125.0% | $266.9M 119.1% | $143.5M 86.8% | $152.1M 92.2% |
| Operating Income | $12.1M 3.5% | $3.5M 1.2% | -$18.3M -8.2% | -$49.3M -25.0% | -$42.8M -19.1% | $21.8M 13.2% | $12.8M 7.8% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | $454K 0.2% | $885K 0.4% | $1.1M 0.7% | $4.1M 2.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.9M -0.6% | $9.2M 3.2% | $8.5M 3.8% | $1.2M 0.6% | $5.2M 2.3% | -$1.1M -0.7% | -$2.9M -1.7% |
| Pretax Income | $10.1M 2.9% | $12.7M 4.4% | -$9.8M -4.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | -$14.0M -4.1% | $249K 0.1% | $151K 0.1% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | $8.4M 2.4% | $2.4M 0.8% | -$3.4M -1.5% | -$11.9M -6.0% | -$7.7M -3.5% | $20.6M 12.5% | $9.9M 6.0% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.51 | $0.15 | $-0.23 | $-0.84 | $-0.63 | $20.64 | $31.31 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.36 | $0.14 | $-0.23 | $-0.84 | $-0.63 | $20.64 | $27.37 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.4M | 16.2M | 15.2M | 14.2M | 12.4M | 400K | 274 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 67.0M | 20.5M | 15.2M | 14.2M | 12.4M | 1.0M | 1K |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 60th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 13.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 57.0 | 53.4 | 57.8 | 59.2 | 54.0 | 54.3 | 54.2 |
| SG&A | 12.0 | 10.7 | 20.9 | 22.5 | 20.3 | 17.7 | 14.6 |
| Operating Income | 7.8 | 13.2 | -19.1 | -25.0 | -8.2 | 1.2 | 3.5 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | -4.1 |
| Net Income | 6.0 | 12.5 | -3.5 | -6.0 | -1.5 | 0.8 | 2.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DSP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| DSP | $195M | 33.0× | 0.1× | 0.6× | 19.0% | 45.8% | 2.4% | 10.2% | 10.2% | 0.0× | 121 |
Peers = companies sharing DSP's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.