Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 552 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.1B covers all $281M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-03-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $55.14 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 15.2%/yr for a decade (off $438M normalized FCF).
The market's 15.2% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.29B shares · net debt -$1.1B
mean -11.3% · volatility σ 91% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied 15.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (91%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $479M buybacks = $479M returned on $530M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.02B 100.0% | $1.70B 100.0% | $1.43B 100.0% | $1.16B 100.0% | $929.4M 100.0% | $703.5M 100.0% | $545.8M 100.0% | $431.0M 100.0% | $398.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $372.2M 18.4% | $320.2M 18.8% | $266.5M 18.6% | $222.9M 19.2% | $172.9M 18.6% | $127.7M 18.2% | $128.9M 23.6% | $106.8M 24.8% | $96.5M 24.3% |
| Gross Profit | $1.65B 81.6% | $1.38B 81.2% | $1.16B 81.4% | $935.6M 80.8% | $756.6M 81.4% | $575.8M 81.8% | $416.9M 76.4% | $324.2M 75.2% | $301.5M 75.7% |
| Research & Development | $474.3M 23.5% | $384.6M 22.6% | $304.7M 21.3% | $218.3M 18.8% | $156.3M 16.8% | $111.4M 15.8% | $119.3M 21.9% | $76.8M 17.8% | $58.3M 14.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $217.4M 10.8% | $195.3M 11.5% | $174.4M 12.2% | $150.2M 13.0% | $126.6M 13.6% | $92.2M 13.1% | $162.0M 29.7% | $91.8M 21.3% | $64.1M 16.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.40B 69.4% | $1.20B 70.6% | $1.04B 72.4% | $842.8M 72.7% | $675.3M 72.7% | $483.9M 68.8% | $588.8M 107.9% | $396.9M 92.1% | $323.3M 81.2% |
| Operating Income | $245.4M 12.2% | $179.4M 10.6% | $128.4M 9.0% | $92.8M 8.0% | $81.3M 8.7% | $91.9M 13.1% | -$171.9M -31.5% | -$72.7M -16.9% | -$21.8M -5.5% |
| Interest Expense | $800K 0.0% | $1.0M 0.1% | $1.4M 0.1% | $8.6M 0.7% | $10.4M 1.1% | $14.2M 2.0% | $45.4M 8.3% | $69.8M 16.2% | $35.2M 8.8% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $6.6M 0.3% | -$4.3M -0.3% | -$10.8M -0.8% | $565K 0.0% | $544K 0.1% | $162K 0.0% | -$1.2M -0.2% | $2.6M 0.6% | $5.2M 1.3% |
| Pretax Income | $299.8M 14.9% | $223.4M 13.2% | $154.9M 10.8% | $90.0M 7.8% | $71.7M 7.7% | $77.9M 11.1% | -$218.5M -40.0% | -$139.9M -32.5% | -$51.8M -13.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $137.1M 6.8% | -$260.3M -15.3% | $283K 0.0% | -$18.0M -1.6% | $19.2M 2.1% | $2.1M 0.3% | $195.3M 35.8% | -$23.7M -5.5% | -$61.0M -15.3% |
| Net Income | $163.0M 8.1% | $484.0M 28.5% | $155.0M 10.8% | $108.0M 9.3% | $52.0M 5.6% | $75.7M 10.8% | -$413.8M -75.8% | -$116.2M -27.0% | $9.2M 2.3% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.54 | $1.62 | $0.53 | $0.38 | $0.18 | $0.27 | $-1.56 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.54 | $1.59 | $0.52 | $0.37 | $0.18 | $0.26 | $-1.56 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 300.1M | 298.4M | 294.1M | 287.7M | 284.2M | 280.5M | 264.9M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 303.7M | 303.6M | 299.3M | 291.6M | 290.9M | 286.5M | 264.9M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| DT | $16.2B | 102.1× | 57.4× | 8.1× | 18.8% | 81.6% | 8.1% | 6.2% | 6.2% | — | 552 |
Peers = companies sharing DT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 28th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 24.8 | 23.6 | 18.2 | 18.6 | 19.2 | 18.6 | 18.8 | 18.4 |
| Gross Profit | 75.2 | 76.4 | 81.8 | 81.4 | 80.8 | 81.4 | 81.2 | 81.6 |
| R&D | 17.8 | 21.9 | 15.8 | 16.8 | 18.8 | 21.3 | 22.6 | 23.5 |
| SG&A | 21.3 | 29.7 | 13.1 | 13.6 | 13.0 | 12.2 | 11.5 | 10.8 |
| Operating Income | -16.9 | -31.5 | 13.1 | 8.7 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 10.6 | 12.2 |
| Income Tax | -5.5 | 35.8 | 0.3 | 2.1 | -1.6 | 0.0 | -15.3 | 6.8 |
| Net Income | -27.0 | -75.8 | 10.8 | 5.6 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 28.5 | 8.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on DT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.