Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.49% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.61 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.0%/yr for a decade (off $1M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$1M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6M 100.0% | $4.9M 100.0% | $5.7M 100.0% | $6.0M 100.0% | $9.9M 100.0% | $16.8M 100.0% | $12.7M 100.0% | $18.1M 100.0% | $19.8M 100.0% | $31.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.9M 81.1% | $4.2M 85.6% | $5.5M 96.1% | $6.3M 105.3% | $8.2M 82.8% | $11.6M 69.2% | $10.7M 84.5% | $14.7M 81.2% | $15.0M 75.7% | $23.3M 75.2% |
| Gross Profit | $672K 18.9% | $699K 14.4% | $223K 3.9% | -$318K -5.3% | $1.7M 17.2% | $5.2M 30.8% | $2.0M 15.5% | $3.4M 18.8% | $4.8M 24.3% | $7.7M 24.8% |
| Research & Development | $412K 11.6% | $524K 10.8% | $587K 10.3% | $1.5M 25.0% | $1.9M 19.2% | $1.4M 8.4% | $1.3M 10.1% | $2.6M 14.3% | $2.9M 14.8% | $3.5M 11.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.3M 36.1% | $2.0M 41.5% | $3.6M 63.1% | $7.1M 119.8% | $8.5M 86.5% | $7.9M 46.9% | $7.4M 58.6% | $9.8M 54.1% | $11.3M 57.0% | $20.1M 64.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.7M 47.6% | $2.5M 52.3% | $4.2M 73.4% | $9.0M 150.4% | $10.4M 105.5% | $9.3M 55.0% | $8.9M 70.3% | $12.5M 69.0% | $16.1M 81.1% | $24.5M 79.1% |
| Operating Income | -$1.0M -28.8% | -$1.8M -37.9% | -$4.0M -69.5% | -$9.3M -155.7% | -$8.7M -88.3% | -$4.1M -24.2% | -$7.0M -54.7% | -$9.1M -50.2% | -$11.3M -56.8% | -$16.8M -54.3% |
| Interest Expense | $0 0.0% | $5K 0.1% | $380K 6.6% | $954K 16.0% | $792K 8.0% | $481K 2.9% | $317K 2.5% | $8K 0.0% | $2K 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2K 0.1% | $0 0.0% | $57K 1.0% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | -$65K -0.7% | -$73K -0.4% | -$91K -0.7% | -$7K -0.0% | -$99K -0.5% | -$18K -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$1.0M -28.8% | -$1.6M -32.6% | -$4.3M -75.0% | -$10.3M -172.2% | -$7.9M -79.9% | -$6.0M -35.6% | -$7.4M -58.0% | -$9.1M -50.3% | -$11.4M -57.4% | -$16.8M -54.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $3K 0.1% | $4K 0.1% | -$1K -0.0% | -$5K -0.0% | $10K 0.1% | $11K 0.1% | -$115K -0.6% | $27K 0.1% |
| Net Income | $1.0M 28.1% | -$1.6M -32.6% | -$4.3M -75.1% | -$10.3M -172.2% | -$7.9M -79.9% | -$6.0M -35.5% | -$7.4M -58.0% | -$9.1M -50.3% | -$11.3M -56.8% | -$16.9M -54.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.18 | $-0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.95 | $-1.45 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.95 | $-1.45 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 5.6M | 4.9M | 3.2M | 1.2M | 4.6M | 3.3M | 2.5M | 12.0M | 11.8M | 11.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 5.6M | 4.9M | 3.2M | 1.2M | 4.6M | 3.3M | — | 12.0M | 11.8M | 11.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $1M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 24%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1M covers the $829000 due within a year 1.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 30th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 81.2 | 84.5 | 69.2 | 82.8 | 105.3 | 96.1 | 85.6 | 81.1 |
| Gross Profit | 18.8 | 15.5 | 30.8 | 17.2 | -5.3 | 3.9 | 14.4 | 18.9 |
| R&D | 14.3 | 10.1 | 8.4 | 19.2 | 25.0 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 11.6 |
| SG&A | 54.1 | 58.6 | 46.9 | 86.5 | 119.8 | 63.1 | 41.5 | 36.1 |
| Operating Income | -50.2 | -54.7 | -24.2 | -88.3 | -155.7 | -69.5 | -37.9 | -28.8 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -50.3 | -58.0 | -35.5 | -79.9 | -172.2 | -75.1 | -32.6 | 28.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EFOI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 14 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| EFOI | $16M | — | — | 4.6× | -26.7% | 18.9% | 28.1% | 24.3% | 24.3% | — | 14 |
Peers = companies sharing EFOI's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.