Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.61% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $5.44 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.6%/yr for a decade (off $7M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.6% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$63M
mean 49.5% · volatility σ 115% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 0.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (115%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $16M buybacks = $16M returned on $5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 40%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $63M covers all $19M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2015-06-30 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.4M 100.0% | $92.8M 100.0% | $98.0M 100.0% | $92.0M 100.0% | $78.3M 100.0% | $72.7M 100.0% | $67.2M 100.0% | $61.3M 100.0% | $58.2M 100.0% | $69.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $26.4M 29.9% | $27.6M 29.7% | $27.3M 27.9% | $24.5M 26.7% | $19.3M 24.6% | $21.1M 29.0% | $21.8M 32.5% | $22.3M 36.4% | $21.2M 36.4% | $23.7M 34.1% |
| Gross Profit | $62.0M 70.1% | $65.2M 70.3% | $70.7M 72.1% | $67.4M 73.3% | $59.0M 75.4% | $51.6M 71.0% | $45.4M 67.5% | $39.0M 63.6% | $37.0M 63.6% | $45.7M 65.9% |
| Research & Development | $29.6M 33.5% | $26.6M 28.7% | $27.3M 27.9% | $24.4M 26.5% | $17.9M 22.9% | $16.6M 22.9% | $14.4M 21.4% | $14.7M 24.0% | $13.8M 23.6% | $16.1M 23.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $8.6M 9.7% | $10.5M 11.3% | $10.3M 10.5% | $11.4M 12.4% | $7.7M 9.9% | $8.0M 11.0% | $8.2M 12.2% | $7.6M 12.3% | $6.6M 11.3% | $7.8M 11.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $57.6M 65.1% | $59.2M 63.8% | $69.3M 70.7% | $69.6M 75.6% | $51.7M 66.0% | $44.2M 60.8% | $39.9M 59.3% | $40.0M 65.2% | $40.7M 70.0% | $51.6M 74.3% |
| Operating Income | $4.4M 5.0% | $6.0M 6.4% | $1.4M 1.4% | -$2.1M -2.3% | $7.3M 9.4% | $7.4M 10.2% | $5.5M 8.2% | -$988K -1.6% | -$3.7M -6.4% | -$5.9M -8.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.3M -1.4% | -$51K -0.1% | -$434K -0.4% | $838K 0.9% | -$559K -0.7% | $185K 0.3% | -$202K -0.3% | -$206K -0.3% | -$32K -0.1% | $728K 1.0% |
| Pretax Income | $5.6M 6.4% | $9.7M 10.5% | $3.4M 3.4% | -$1.2M -1.3% | $6.8M 8.7% | $8.0M 11.0% | $5.0M 7.4% | -$2.2M -3.6% | -$5.5M -9.4% | -$7.1M -10.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$26.6M -30.1% | $1.9M 2.1% | $1.2M 1.3% | $1.2M 1.3% | -$166K -0.2% | $778K 1.1% | $833K 1.2% | -$186K -0.3% | $533K 0.9% | -$863K -1.2% |
| Net Income | $32.3M 36.5% | $7.8M 8.4% | $2.1M 2.2% | -$2.4M -2.7% | $7.0M 8.9% | $7.2M 9.9% | $4.2M 6.2% | -$2.0M -3.2% | -$6.0M -10.3% | -$6.2M -9.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.15 | $0.25 | $0.07 | $-0.08 | $0.22 | $0.24 | $0.15 | $-0.07 | $-0.22 | $-0.23 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.13 | $0.25 | $0.06 | $-0.08 | $0.21 | $0.23 | $0.14 | $-0.07 | $-0.22 | $-0.23 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 28.2M | 30.8M | 32.0M | 31.6M | 31.0M | 30.6M | 28.6M | 27.3M | 27.1M | 27.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 28.6M | 31.5M | 32.8M | 31.6M | 32.6M | 32.0M | 30.4M | 27.3M | 27.1M | 27.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| EGAN | $147M | 4.8× | — | 1.7× | -4.7% | 70.1% | 36.5% | 40.0% | 40.0% | — | 110 |
Peers = companies sharing EGAN's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 5th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 36.4 | 32.5 | 29.0 | 24.6 | 26.7 | 27.9 | 29.7 | 29.9 |
| Gross Profit | 63.6 | 67.5 | 71.0 | 75.4 | 73.3 | 72.1 | 70.3 | 70.1 |
| R&D | 24.0 | 21.4 | 22.9 | 22.9 | 26.5 | 27.9 | 28.7 | 33.5 |
| SG&A | 12.3 | 12.2 | 11.0 | 9.9 | 12.4 | 10.5 | 11.3 | 9.7 |
| Operating Income | -1.6 | 8.2 | 10.2 | 9.4 | -2.3 | 1.4 | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| Income Tax | -0.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.1 | -30.1 |
| Net Income | -3.2 | 6.2 | 9.9 | 8.9 | -2.7 | 2.2 | 8.4 | 36.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EGAN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.