Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 173 of 5,944 reporting institutions (90th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $1.81 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -5.7%/yr for a decade (off $63M normalized FCF).
The market's -5.7% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.14B shares · net debt $228M
mean -39.8% · volatility σ 127% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied -5.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (127%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $2M buybacks = $2M returned on $52M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5.5% on $321M of debt.
Cash of $93M fully covers short-term debt of $39M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $735.8M 100.0% | $715.1M 100.0% | $728.7M 100.0% | $743.9M 100.0% | $638.1M 100.0% | $532.3M 100.0% | $446.2M 100.0% | $352.6M 100.0% | $296.5M 100.0% | $253.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $260.7M 35.4% | $229.8M 32.1% | $224.9M 30.9% | $241.5M 32.5% | $247.6M 38.8% | — | — | — | $20.5M 6.9% | $19.7M 7.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $20.5M 6.9% | $19.7M 7.8% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $50.7M 17.1% | $42.4M 16.7% |
| Gross Profit | $475.0M 64.6% | $485.3M 67.9% | $503.8M 69.1% | $502.5M 67.5% | $390.6M 61.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research & Development | $113.0M 15.4% | $123.2M 17.2% | $136.2M 18.7% | $142.5M 19.2% | $112.4M 17.6% | $92.0M 17.3% | $77.8M 17.4% | $62.1M 17.6% | $36.4M 12.3% | $29.0M 11.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $90.7M 12.3% | $82.4M 11.5% | $112.2M 15.4% | $108.0M 14.5% | $118.1M 18.5% | $100.1M 18.8% | $87.0M 19.5% | $72.2M 20.5% | $51.9M 17.5% | $41.9M 16.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $456.1M 62.0% | $470.1M 65.7% | $531.4M 72.9% | $568.8M 76.5% | $544.7M 85.4% | $678.5M 127.5% | $606.1M 135.8% | $442.2M 125.4% | $338.4M 114.1% | $260.1M 102.6% |
| Operating Income | $18.9M 2.6% | $15.2M 2.1% | -$27.6M -3.8% | -$66.3M -8.9% | -$154.1M -24.2% | -$146.1M -27.5% | -$159.8M -35.8% | -$89.6M -25.4% | -$41.9M -14.1% | -$6.7M -2.6% |
| Interest Expense | $17.8M 2.4% | $28.9M 4.0% | $39.8M 5.5% | $27.3M 3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.4M 0.3% | -$10.4M -1.5% | $3.5M 0.5% | $23.2M 3.1% | -$21.6M -3.4% | -$18.6M -3.5% | -$11.7M -2.6% | $1.5M 0.4% | $3.7M 1.2% | $1.8M 0.7% |
| Pretax Income | $3.5M 0.5% | -$24.1M -3.4% | -$64.0M -8.8% | -$70.3M -9.5% | -$175.8M -27.5% | -$164.7M -30.9% | -$171.5M -38.4% | -$88.2M -25.0% | -$38.2M -12.9% | -$4.9M -1.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.9M 0.3% | $3.1M 0.4% | $3.6M 0.5% | $2.8M 0.4% | -$387K -0.1% | $843K 0.2% | $832K 0.2% | $569K 0.2% | $66.3M 22.4% | -$126K -0.0% |
| Net Income | $1.6M 0.2% | -$27.2M -3.8% | -$67.6M -9.3% | -$73.1M -9.8% | -$175.4M -27.5% | -$165.6M -31.1% | -$172.4M -38.6% | -$88.7M -25.2% | -$104.5M -35.2% | -$4.8M -1.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.01 | $-0.21 | $-0.56 | $-0.63 | $-1.55 | $-1.57 | $-1.72 | — | $-1.14 | $-0.05 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.21 | $-0.56 | $-0.63 | $-1.55 | $-1.57 | $-1.72 | — | $-1.14 | $-0.05 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 137.7M | 129.8M | 121.1M | 116.0M | 113.4M | 105.7M | 100.0M | — | 92.0M | 90.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 142.6M | 129.8M | 121.1M | 116.0M | 113.4M | 105.7M | 100.0M | — | 92.0M | 90.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 15-yr range · 22th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 15-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 8.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | 38.8 | 32.5 | 30.9 | 32.1 | 35.4 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | 61.2 | 67.5 | 69.1 | 67.9 | 64.6 |
| R&D | 17.6 | 17.4 | 17.3 | 17.6 | 19.2 | 18.7 | 17.2 | 15.4 |
| SG&A | 20.5 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 18.5 | 14.5 | 15.4 | 11.5 | 12.3 |
| Operating Income | -25.4 | -35.8 | -27.5 | -24.2 | -8.9 | -3.8 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | -25.2 | -38.6 | -31.1 | -27.5 | -9.8 | -9.3 | -3.8 | 0.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EGHT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.16T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.8× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.70T | 27.7× | 19.6× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.10T | 128.8× | 60.7× | 29.3× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $421.4B | 279.8× | 291.6× | 94.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| RPAY | $338.0B | — | — | 1092.8× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| UMC | $307.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $262.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $250.5B | 234.4× | 156.5× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SNDK | $235.7B | — | — | 32.0× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| TXN | $234.6B | 47.4× | 30.9× | 13.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $204.0B | 78.4× | 133.3× | 24.9× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $202.7B | 37.7× | 15.2× | 4.6× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| EGHT | $256M | 181.0× | 13.1× | 0.3× | 2.9% | 64.6% | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.4% | 8.7× | 173 |
Peers = companies sharing EGHT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.