Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 484 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.71B 100.0% | $4.44B 100.0% | $4.42B 100.0% | $4.41B 100.0% | $4.76B 100.0% | $3.27B 100.0% | $3.07B 100.0% | $3.07B 100.0% | $2.89B 100.0% | $2.91B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.12B 45.0% | $2.00B 45.1% | $1.93B 43.7% | $1.91B 43.4% | $2.13B 44.8% | $1.67B 50.9% | $1.47B 47.9% | $1.57B 51.3% | $1.49B 51.7% | $1.41B 48.4% |
| Gross Profit | $2.59B 55.0% | $2.44B 54.9% | $2.49B 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research & Development | $368.0M 7.8% | $344.0M 7.7% | $327.0M 7.4% | $321.0M 7.3% | $369.0M 7.7% | $329.0M 10.1% | $270.0M 8.8% | $246.6M 8.0% | $251.7M 8.7% | $265.8M 9.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.43B 30.3% | $1.31B 29.6% | $1.28B 29.1% | $1.26B 28.7% | $1.40B 29.5% | $997.0M 30.5% | $760.0M 24.7% | $735.2M 24.0% | $779.8M 27.0% | $784.8M 26.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | $3.95B 89.0% | $5.61B 127.1% | $4.48B 101.6% | $5.33B 112.0% | $3.95B 120.6% | $2.99B 97.5% | $2.95B 96.3% | $3.12B 108.1% | $2.94B 100.8% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $277.0M 6.3% | $241.0M 5.5% | $236.0M 5.0% | $150.0M 4.6% | $79.0M 2.6% | $29.6M 1.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $43.0M 0.9% | $31.0M 0.7% | $4.0M 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | -$75.0M -1.7% | -$32.0M -0.7% | -$5.0M -0.1% | $178.0M 5.4% | -$28.0M -0.9% | -$41.3M -1.3% | $100K 0.0% | $2.8M 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$224.0M -4.8% | $488.0M 11.0% | -$1.20B -27.1% | -$72.0M -1.6% | -$571.0M -12.0% | -$677.0M -20.7% | $78.0M 2.5% | $114.1M 3.7% | -$232.6M -8.1% | -$22.4M -0.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.0M 0.2% | $150.0M 3.4% | $36.0M 0.8% | $6.0M 0.1% | -$88.0M -1.8% | -$103.0M -3.1% | $10.0M 0.3% | $27.6M 0.9% | $78.1M 2.7% | $25.5M 0.9% |
| Net Income | -$232.0M -4.9% | $338.0M 7.6% | -$1.23B -27.9% | -$78.0M -1.8% | -$483.0M -10.1% | -$574.0M -17.5% | $68.0M 2.2% | $86.5M 2.8% | -$310.7M -10.8% | -$47.9M -1.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.47 | $0.68 | $-2.50 | $-0.16 | $-0.99 | $-1.30 | $0.18 | $0.28 | $-1.06 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.47 | $0.68 | $-2.50 | $-0.16 | $-0.99 | $-1.30 | $0.18 | $0.28 | $-1.06 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 496.4M | 494.0M | 492.3M | 488.3M | 487.2M | 441.4M | 369.0M | 313.7M | 293.3M | 293.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 496.4M | 497.3M | 492.3M | 488.3M | 487.2M | 441.4M | 370.3M | 313.7M | 293.3M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $22.74 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 21.2%/yr for a decade (off $270M normalized FCF).
The market's 21.2% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.50B shares · net debt $3.2B
mean 19.3% · volatility σ 201% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 21.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (201%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $284M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 56th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 51.3 | 47.9 | 50.9 | 44.8 | 43.4 | 43.7 | 45.1 | 45.0 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | 56.3 | 54.9 | 55.0 |
| R&D | 8.0 | 8.8 | 10.1 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 7.8 |
| SG&A | 24.0 | 24.7 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 28.7 | 29.1 | 29.6 | 30.3 |
| Income Tax | 0.9 | 0.3 | -3.1 | -1.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 0.2 |
| Net Income | 2.8 | 2.2 | -17.5 | -10.1 | -1.8 | -27.9 | 7.6 | -4.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ELAN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $545M is below the $584M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-09-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~4.8% on $5.8B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 1085 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCAX | $1.24T | — | — | — | — | — | — | -34.4% | -34.4% | — | 143 |
| LLY | $1.03T | 50.2× | — | 15.9× | 44.7% | 83.0% | 31.7% | 77.8% | 29.9% | — | 4,193 |
| AKTX | $894.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | -61.1% | -61.1% | — | 1 |
| JNJ | $650.5B | 24.5× | — | 6.9× | 6.0% | 67.9% | 28.5% | 32.9% | 20.7% | — | 4,451 |
| ABBV | $467.1B | 111.9× | 33.4× | 7.6× | 8.6% | 70.2% | 6.9% | -129% | 6.6% | 4.2× | 3,895 |
| MRK | $368.2B | 20.2× | — | 5.7× | 1.3% | 74.8% | 28.1% | 34.7% | 17.9% | — | 3,594 |
| UNH | $339.9B | 28.4× | 19.7× | 0.8× | 11.8% | 88.7% | 2.7% | 12.0% | 6.8% | 3.9× | 2,891 |
| AZN | $257.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,248 |
| TMO | $248.2B | 37.1× | 31.9× | 5.6× | 3.9% | — | 15.0% | 12.6% | 7.0% | 4.9× | 2,481 |
| AMGN | $204.6B | 26.7× | 17.6× | 5.6× | 10.0% | 67.2% | 21.0% | 89.1% | 12.2% | 3.8× | 3,014 |
| GILD | $187.3B | 22.3× | 20.4× | 6.4× | 2.4% | 78.8% | 28.9% | 37.5% | 17.9% | 2.4× | 2,218 |
| ABT | $178.0B | 27.5× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 5.7% | 56.4% | 14.7% | 12.5% | 10.0% | 1.4× | 2,964 |
| PFE | $157.1B | 20.3× | — | 2.5× | -1.6% | 74.3% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 5.1% | — | 2,838 |
| DHR | $150.2B | 42.1× | 31.0× | 6.1× | 2.9% | 59.1% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 3.4× | 2,083 |
| ISRG | $136.2B | 48.7× | 37.5× | 13.5× | 20.5% | 66.0% | 28.4% | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | 2,190 |
| VRTX | $131.1B | 33.7× | 28.8× | 10.9× | 8.9% | 86.2% | 32.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | — | 1,609 |
| BMY | $127.8B | 18.2× | — | 2.6× | -0.2% | 71.1% | 14.6% | 38.2% | 11.1% | — | 2,431 |
| MDT | $118.8B | 24.9× | 12.6× | 3.3× | 8.4% | 65.0% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 0.2× | 2,114 |
| CVS | $114.7B | 64.9× | 11.5× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.0× | 1,795 |
| SYK | $107.1B | 33.4× | 18.4× | 4.3× | 11.2% | 64.0% | 12.9% | 14.5% | 8.5% | 2.5× | 2,196 |
| MCK | $102.5B | 22.9× | 16.2× | 0.3× | 12.4% | 3.6% | 1.2% | -219% | 109% | 1.0× | 1,946 |
| HCA | $96.4B | 15.1× | — | 1.3× | 7.1% | — | 9.0% | -113% | 16.8% | — | 1,346 |
| ELV | $91.4B | 16.4× | 15.5× | 0.5× | 12.5% | 89.4% | 2.8% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 4.2× | 1,397 |
| REGN | $82.6B | 19.0× | 19.8× | 5.8× | 1.0% | — | 31.4% | 14.4% | 13.6% | 0.5× | 1,336 |
| CI | $72.7B | 12.4× | 5.5× | 0.3× | 11.2% | 21.8% | 2.2% | 14.3% | 14.1% | 0.0× | 1,583 |
| ELAN | $11.3B | — | — | 2.4× | 6.2% | 55.0% | -4.9% | -3.5% | -2.3% | — | 484 |
Peers = companies sharing ELAN's sector (Healthcare) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.