Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 431 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $93.32 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 20.1%/yr for a decade (off $123M normalized FCF).
The market's 20.1% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares · net debt $552M
mean 183.0% · volatility σ 346% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 20.1%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (346%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $50M buybacks = $50M returned on $190M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $290M covers the $38M due within a year 7.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Interest last disclosed in FY2020 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 10-yr range · 65th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 10-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.1 | 36.0 | 35.2 | 35.8 | 32.6 | 29.3 | 28.8 | 29.3 |
| Gross Profit | 60.9 | 64.0 | 64.8 | 64.2 | 67.4 | 70.7 | 71.2 | 70.7 |
| SG&A | 51.1 | 55.6 | 61.0 | 56.6 | 55.7 | 56.1 | 59.2 | 62.7 |
| Operating Income | 9.8 | 10.6 | 3.0 | 7.6 | 11.8 | 14.6 | 12.0 | 4.5 |
| Income Tax | 0.9 | 2.2 | -0.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0.9 |
| Net Income | 5.8 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 8.5 | 1.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on ELF: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.64B 100.0% | $1.31B 100.0% | $1.02B 100.0% | $578.8M 100.0% | $392.2M 100.0% | $318.1M 100.0% | $282.9M 100.0% | $267.4M 100.0% | $269.9M 100.0% | $229.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $479.1M 29.3% | $377.8M 28.8% | $299.8M 29.3% | $188.4M 32.6% | $140.4M 35.8% | $111.9M 35.2% | $101.7M 36.0% | $104.7M 39.1% | $105.2M 39.0% | $97.3M 42.4% |
| Gross Profit | $1.16B 70.7% | $935.7M 71.2% | $724.1M 70.7% | $390.4M 67.4% | $251.7M 64.2% | $206.2M 64.8% | $181.1M 64.0% | $162.7M 60.9% | $164.7M 61.0% | $132.2M 57.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.03B 62.7% | $777.7M 59.2% | $574.4M 56.1% | $322.3M 55.7% | $221.9M 56.6% | $194.2M 61.0% | $157.2M 55.6% | $136.6M 51.1% | $131.4M 48.7% | $109.2M 47.5% |
| Operating Income | $73.6M 4.5% | $158.0M 12.0% | $149.7M 14.6% | $68.1M 11.8% | $29.8M 7.6% | $9.4M 3.0% | $29.9M 10.6% | $26.2M 9.8% | $33.3M 12.3% | $23.1M 10.1% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | — | — | — | $6.3M 2.2% | $7.8M 2.9% | $8.8M 3.3% | $16.3M 7.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.8M 0.2% | $1.3M 0.1% | $1.2M 0.1% | -$1.9M -0.3% | -$1.4M -0.4% | -$1.6M -0.5% | $426K 0.2% | -$390K -0.1% | -$2.0M -0.8% | $3.0M 1.3% |
| Pretax Income | $40.5M 2.5% | $145.5M 11.1% | $141.0M 13.8% | $64.1M 11.1% | $25.4M 6.5% | $3.7M 1.2% | $24.1M 8.5% | $18.0M 6.7% | $22.5M 8.3% | $9.8M 4.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $14.1M 0.9% | $33.4M 2.5% | $13.3M 1.3% | $2.5M 0.4% | $3.7M 0.9% | -$2.5M -0.8% | $6.2M 2.2% | $2.4M 0.9% | -$11.0M -4.1% | $4.5M 2.0% |
| Net Income | $26.3M 1.6% | $112.1M 8.5% | $127.7M 12.5% | $61.5M 10.6% | $21.8M 5.6% | $6.2M 2.0% | $17.9M 6.3% | $15.5M 5.8% | $33.5M 12.4% | $5.3M 2.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.45 | $1.99 | $2.33 | $1.17 | $0.43 | $0.13 | $0.37 | $0.33 | $0.74 | $-39.47 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.44 | $1.92 | $2.21 | $1.11 | $0.41 | $0.12 | $0.35 | $0.32 | $0.68 | $-39.47 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 58.3M | 56.2M | 54.7M | 52.5M | 50.9M | 49.4M | 48.5M | 46.8M | 45.4M | 12.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 59.4M | 58.3M | 57.8M | 55.3M | 53.7M | 52.0M | 50.8M | 49.3M | 49.4M | 12.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.5B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.2B | 49.1× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $378.9B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $346.8B | 22.7× | 16.4× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $296.4B | 26.2× | 17.3× | 7.3× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $183.0B | 22.3× | 14.9× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.7B | 16.9× | 13.6× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $80.3B | 32.8× | 18.9× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $72.4B | 19.7× | 10.5× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.3B | 33.4× | 19.6× | 3.5× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.5B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.7B | 20.5× | 14.3× | 2.6× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $42.6B | 39.5× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $41.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.6B | 39.5× | 10.0× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $34.2B | 23.5× | 11.7× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| HSY | $34.1B | — | 20.1× | 2.9× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| EL | $33.8B | — | 768.2× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.6B | 16.2× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $29.3B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.5B | 18.2× | 8.1× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.1B | 31.5× | 18.8× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| ELF | $5.5B | 212.1× | 39.6× | 3.4× | 24.6% | 70.7% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 5.5× | 431 |
Peers = companies sharing ELF's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.