Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -0.60% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $1.23 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -5.4%/yr for a decade (off $2M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$2M
mean -72.8% · volatility σ 151% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied -5.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (151%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1M 100.0% | $12.5M 100.0% | $29.2M 100.0% | $11.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.4M 85.3% | $10.9M 87.2% | $23.7M 81.0% | $9.3M 82.8% |
| Gross Profit | $754K 14.7% | $1.6M 12.8% | $5.5M 19.0% | $1.9M 17.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $2.1M 41.5% | $1.2M 9.5% | $1.2M 4.1% | $681K 6.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.2M 44.0% | $1.2M 9.6% | $1.2M 4.1% | $684K 6.1% |
| Operating Income | -$1.5M -29.2% | $408K 3.3% | $4.3M 14.8% | $1.2M 11.1% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $5K 0.0% | $74K 0.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$324 -0.0% | $1K 0.0% | -$27K -0.1% | $68K 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$1.5M -29.2% | $409K 3.3% | $4.3M 14.7% | $1.3M 11.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | — | $125K 1.0% | $588K 2.0% | $175K 1.6% |
| Net Income | -$1.5M -29.3% | $275K 2.2% | $3.7M 12.6% | $1.1M 10.0% |
| Per Share | ||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | $0.02 | $0.31 | $0.09 |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $0.02 | $0.31 | $0.09 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | — | 12.0M | 12.0M | 12.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | — | 12.0M | 12.0M | 12.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $300000 buybacks = $300000 returned on -$2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 4 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 4 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.8 | 81.0 | 87.2 | 85.3 |
| Gross Profit | 17.2 | 19.0 | 12.8 | 14.7 |
| SG&A | 6.1 | 4.1 | 9.5 | 41.5 |
| Operating Income | 11.1 | 14.8 | 3.3 | -29.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | — |
| Net Income | 10.0 | 12.6 | 2.2 | -29.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on EPSM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 8 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 229 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $852.0B | 39.1× | — | 1.2× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $396.8B | 49.2× | 30.3× | 1.4× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.5× | 4,050 |
| KO | $379.7B | 29.0× | 24.9× | 7.9× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $344.0B | 22.5× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $293.5B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $177.6B | 21.6× | 14.6× | 1.9× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| MO | $116.4B | 16.9× | 13.5× | 5.0× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 31.3% | 2.5× | 2,375 |
| MDLZ | $78.7B | 32.2× | 18.5× | 2.0× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| TGT | $71.6B | 19.5× | 10.4× | 0.7× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| CL | $70.1B | 33.3× | 19.5× | 3.4× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 26.5% | 2.0× | 1,873 |
| MNST | $43.7B | — | 16.4× | 5.3× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| KDP | $42.1B | 20.2× | 14.2× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| ADM | $41.2B | 38.2× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| FMX | $40.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| JBS | $39.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| KR | $39.1B | 39.0× | 9.9× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 4.7% | 3.0× | 1,327 |
| SYY | $38.6B | 21.2× | 9.7× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| HSY | $34.4B | — | 20.2× | 3.0× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| KVUE | $34.1B | 23.4× | 11.6× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | 0.5× | 967 |
| EL | $33.6B | — | 764.7× | 2.4× | -8.2% | 74.0% | -7.9% | -29.3% | -29.3% | 0.1× | 800 |
| KMB | $32.5B | 16.1× | 10.3× | 2.0× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KHC | $28.9B | — | — | 1.2× | -3.5% | 33.3% | -23.4% | -14.0% | -14.0% | — | 1,059 |
| DG | $27.0B | 17.9× | 7.9× | 0.6× | 5.2% | 30.7% | 3.5% | 17.8% | 17.8% | — | 1,099 |
| KOF | $23.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 249 |
| CHD | $23.0B | 31.4× | 18.7× | 3.7× | 1.6% | 44.7% | 11.9% | 18.4% | 11.9% | 1.7× | 1,004 |
| EPSM | $17M | — | — | 3.2× | -59.1% | 14.7% | -29.3% | -13.0% | -13.0% | — | 8 |
Peers = companies sharing EPSM's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.