Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 466 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $39.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 1.7%/yr for a decade (off $547M normalized FCF).
The market's 1.7% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares · net debt $2.3B
mean 6.7% · volatility σ 59% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied 1.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (59%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 33% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $121M dividends + $248M buybacks = $368M returned on $367M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 5%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $264M covers the $0 due within a year 264000000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-28 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~4.5% on $2.5B of debt.
Cash of $264M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.46B 100.0% | $4.61B 100.0% | $4.63B 100.0% | $4.72B 100.0% | $4.80B 100.0% | $3.62B 100.0% | $5.76B 100.0% | $5.49B 100.0% | $5.28B 100.0% | $4.98B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.47B 55.4% | $2.54B 55.2% | $2.71B 58.7% | $2.79B 59.1% | $2.84B 59.2% | $2.16B 59.6% | $3.71B 64.4% | $3.53B 64.3% | $3.36B 63.6% | $3.19B 64.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.35B 63.4% | $3.18B 63.8% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | $2.16B 59.8% | $2.05B 35.6% | $1.96B 35.7% | $1.93B 36.4% | $1.80B 36.2% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | $48.2M 0.8% | $50.3M 0.9% | $50.7M 1.0% | $53.1M 1.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.29B 29.0% | $1.24B 26.9% | $1.17B 25.3% | $1.08B 22.8% | $1.09B 22.8% | $848.6M 23.4% | $1.26B 21.8% | $1.24B 22.6% | $1.20B 22.7% | $1.14B 22.8% |
| Operating Income | $516.1M 11.6% | $737.9M 16.0% | $614.9M 13.3% | $774.3M 16.4% | $811.1M 16.9% | $567.7M 15.7% | $698.5M 12.1% | $595.2M 10.9% | $682.5M 12.9% | $618.6M 12.4% |
| Interest Expense | $115.2M 2.6% | $120.5M 2.6% | $116.5M 2.5% | $119.2M 2.5% | $84.3M 1.8% | $83.8M 2.3% | $94.2M 1.6% | $74.5M 1.4% | $49.4M 0.9% | $49.1M 1.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $4.1M 0.1% | -$11.9M -0.3% | $19.5M 0.4% | $12.0M 0.3% | -$400K -0.0% | $15.3M 0.4% | -$29.0M -0.5% | $16.3M 0.3% | $1.7M 0.0% | $12.6M 0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $405.0M 9.1% | $605.5M 13.1% | $517.9M 11.2% | $667.1M 14.1% | $726.4M 15.1% | $499.2M 13.8% | $575.3M 10.0% | $537.0M 9.8% | $634.8M 12.0% | $582.1M 11.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $106.2M 2.4% | $133.6M 2.9% | $112.4M 2.4% | $127.2M 2.7% | $166.7M 3.5% | $110.8M 3.1% | $144.0M 2.5% | $147.0M 2.7% | $159.5M 3.0% | $169.7M 3.4% |
| Net Income | $298.8M 6.7% | $471.9M 10.2% | $404.5M 8.7% | $686.7M 14.5% | $772.4M 16.1% | $553.1M 15.3% | $431.9M 7.5% | $389.6M 7.1% | $472.6M 8.9% | $413.2M 8.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.48 | $3.78 | $3.19 | $5.27 | $5.62 | $3.99 | $3.09 | $2.69 | $3.08 | $2.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.47 | $3.75 | $3.17 | $5.23 | $5.54 | $3.94 | $3.06 | $2.66 | $3.03 | $2.62 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 120.7M | 124.8M | 126.9M | 130.3M | 137.5M | 138.7M | 139.9M | 144.6M | 153.2M | 154.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 121.2M | 125.7M | 127.7M | 131.3M | 139.5M | 140.2M | 141.3M | 146.4M | 155.8M | 157.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 27th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 9.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.3 | 64.4 | 59.6 | 59.2 | 59.1 | 58.7 | 55.2 | 55.4 |
| Gross Profit | 35.7 | 35.6 | 59.8 | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | 0.9 | 0.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 22.6 | 21.8 | 23.4 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 25.3 | 26.9 | 29.0 |
| Operating Income | 10.9 | 12.1 | 15.7 | 16.9 | 16.4 | 13.3 | 16.0 | 11.6 |
| Income Tax | 2.7 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| Net Income | 7.1 | 7.5 | 15.3 | 16.1 | 14.5 | 8.7 | 10.2 | 6.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FBIN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 651 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $29.49T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $371.6B | 42.5× | 29.7× | 5.5× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $328.8B | 38.5× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $259.8B | 39.0× | 18.5× | 2.9× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| BA | $199.4B | 79.4× | 40.2× | 2.2× | 34.5% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 41.0% | 3.3% | 10.0× | 2,435 |
| DE | $185.4B | 37.1× | — | 4.1× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| ABBNY | $177.4B | 47.9× | 31.6× | 5.5× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $167.6B | 23.6× | 16.1× | 6.8× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $158.8B | 39.2× | — | 5.8× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| HON | $131.2B | 28.1× | 16.1× | 3.5× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| LMT | $123.2B | 25.0× | 16.1× | 1.6× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 17.7% | 2.5× | 2,807 |
| PH | $118.7B | 34.1× | 26.8× | 6.0× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| ADP | $108.3B | 24.9× | — | 4.9× | 6.7% | 46.4% | 20.1% | 73.2% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| GD | $96.2B | 23.0× | 16.9× | 1.8× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| TT | $94.4B | 32.6× | 23.3× | 4.4× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $92.4B | 70.8× | 43.8× | 9.0× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.4% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| PWR | $92.2B | 90.7× | 45.8× | 3.2× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 0.4× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $91.9B | 28.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| HWM | $90.7B | 60.9× | 39.9× | 11.0× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 17.9% | 1.3× | 1,399 |
| CSX | $89.1B | 31.1× | 14.4× | 6.3× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| MMM | $87.3B | 27.4× | 16.8× | 3.5× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| WM | $86.0B | 31.8× | 12.1× | 3.4× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| UPS | $85.0B | 15.3× | 9.5× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| EMR | $83.0B | 36.5× | — | 4.6× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| CTAS | $79.8B | 45.0× | 28.7× | 7.7× | 7.7% | 50.0% | 17.5% | 38.7% | 25.5% | 0.8× | 1,366 |
| FBIN | $4.8B | 16.1× | 11.1× | 1.1× | -3.2% | 44.6% | 6.7% | 12.5% | 6.1% | 4.0× | 466 |
Peers = companies sharing FBIN's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.