Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 818 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $966.30 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 17.7%/yr for a decade (off $620M normalized FCF).
The market's 17.7% is in line with its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $2.9B
mean 19.2% · volatility σ 18% · implied rate exceeded in 6/8 yrs
Central path = implied 17.7%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (18%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1.4B buybacks = $1.4B returned on $770M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 50%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $134M covers the $0 due within a year 134136000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-09-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.4% on $3.1B of debt.
Cash of $134M is below short-term debt of $400M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.99B 100.0% | $1.72B 100.0% | $1.51B 100.0% | $1.38B 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $1.16B 100.0% | $1.03B 100.0% | $932.2M 100.0% | $881.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $353.7M 17.8% | $348.2M 20.3% | $311.1M 20.6% | $302.2M 21.9% | $332.5M 25.3% | $361.1M 27.9% | $336.8M 29.0% | $312.9M 30.3% | $287.6M 30.9% | $265.2M 30.1% |
| Research & Development | $188.3M 9.5% | $171.9M 10.0% | $159.9M 10.6% | $146.8M 10.7% | $171.2M 13.0% | $166.5M 12.9% | $149.5M 12.9% | $128.4M 12.4% | $110.9M 11.9% | $103.7M 11.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $513.0M 25.8% | $462.8M 26.9% | $400.6M 26.5% | $383.9M 27.9% | $396.3M 30.1% | $420.9M 32.5% | $414.1M 35.7% | $376.9M 36.5% | $337.2M 36.2% | $328.9M 37.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.07B 53.5% | $983.9M 57.3% | $870.7M 57.5% | $834.9M 60.6% | $811.0M 61.6% | $998.6M 77.1% | $906.5M 78.1% | $824.8M 79.9% | $752.8M 80.8% | $711.8M 80.8% |
| Operating Income | $924.9M 46.5% | $733.6M 42.7% | $642.8M 42.5% | $542.4M 39.4% | $505.5M 38.4% | $296.0M 22.9% | $253.5M 21.9% | $175.4M 17.0% | $182.2M 19.5% | $169.6M 19.2% |
| Interest Expense | $133.6M 6.7% | $105.6M 6.2% | $95.5M 6.3% | $69.0M 5.0% | $40.1M 3.0% | $42.2M 3.3% | $39.8M 3.4% | $31.3M 3.0% | $25.8M 2.8% | $26.6M 3.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $11.4M 0.6% | $14.0M 0.8% | $6.3M 0.4% | -$2.1M -0.2% | $7.7M 0.6% | $3.2M 0.2% | $2.3M 0.2% | $12.9M 1.2% | -$86K -0.0% | $1.6M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $802.6M 40.3% | $642.0M 37.4% | $553.6M 36.6% | $471.3M 34.2% | $473.1M 35.9% | $257.0M 19.9% | $216.1M 18.6% | $156.9M 15.2% | $156.3M 16.8% | $144.6M 16.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $150.6M 7.6% | $129.2M 7.5% | $124.2M 8.2% | $97.8M 7.1% | $81.1M 6.2% | $20.6M 1.6% | $23.9M 2.1% | $30.4M 2.9% | $22.9M 2.5% | $35.1M 4.0% |
| Net Income | $651.9M 32.7% | $512.8M 29.9% | $429.4M 28.4% | $373.5M 27.1% | $392.1M 29.8% | $236.4M 18.3% | $192.1M 16.6% | $126.5M 12.3% | $133.4M 14.3% | $109.4M 12.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $26.90 | $20.78 | $17.18 | $14.34 | $13.65 | $8.13 | $6.63 | $4.26 | $4.32 | $3.52 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $26.54 | $20.45 | $16.93 | $14.18 | $13.40 | $7.90 | $6.34 | $4.06 | $4.14 | $3.39 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 24.2M | 24.7M | 25.0M | 26.0M | 28.7M | 29.1M | 29.0M | 29.7M | 30.9M | 31.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 24.6M | 25.1M | 25.4M | 26.3M | 29.3M | 29.9M | 30.3M | 31.2M | 32.2M | 32.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 62th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.6× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 30.3 | 29.0 | 27.9 | 25.3 | 21.9 | 20.6 | 20.3 | 17.8 |
| R&D | 12.4 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 13.0 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| SG&A | 36.5 | 35.7 | 32.5 | 30.1 | 27.9 | 26.5 | 26.9 | 25.8 |
| Operating Income | 17.0 | 21.9 | 22.9 | 38.4 | 39.4 | 42.5 | 42.7 | 46.5 |
| Income Tax | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 7.6 |
| Net Income | 12.3 | 16.6 | 18.3 | 29.8 | 27.1 | 28.4 | 29.9 | 32.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FICO: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $10.83T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.20T | 43.6× | 39.0× | 24.1× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.98T | 45.2× | 34.8× | 12.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.64T | 27.3× | 19.3× | 11.0× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.65T | 72.8× | 65.1× | 25.8× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.04T | 122.1× | 57.5× | 27.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $888.5B | 205.7× | 210.2× | 25.6× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $543.3B | — | 67.4× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $436.6B | 43.2× | 36.6× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $416.9B | 276.7× | 288.5× | 93.2× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $383.6B | 67.8× | 36.1× | 3.4× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $341.7B | 64.9× | 54.5× | 18.5× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $331.0B | 48.2× | 38.1× | 11.7× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $325.1B | — | — | 1051.3× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $283.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $281.9B | 311.6× | 242.9× | 57.3× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SAP | $261.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| PANW | $250.9B | 234.8× | 156.8× | 27.2× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| ANET | $250.7B | 72.6× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| TXN | $236.9B | 47.8× | 31.2× | 13.4× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $225.6B | 31.1× | 24.4× | 5.4× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $222.8B | 21.3× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| SNDK | $221.9B | — | — | 30.2× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| QCOM | $198.5B | 36.9× | 14.9× | 4.5× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| MRVL | $194.6B | 74.8× | 127.2× | 23.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| FICO | $23.0B | 36.4× | 27.5× | 11.5× | 15.9% | 82.2% | 32.7% | -37.3% | 49.8% | 3.3× | 818 |
Peers = companies sharing FICO's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.