Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 256 of 5,944 reporting institutions (93th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $7.66 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -14.6%/yr for a decade (off $72M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt -$691M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.26B 100.0% | $2.70B 100.0% | $2.22B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $680.8M 100.0% | $561.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.97B 86.9% | $2.36B 87.4% | $2.08B 93.6% | $1.26B 105.2% | $749.9M 110.2% | $553.4M 98.6% |
| Gross Profit | $295.8M 13.1% | $341.1M 12.6% | $141.0M 6.4% | -$62.4M -5.2% | -$69.1M -10.2% | $7.9M 1.4% |
| Research & Development | $86.2M 3.8% | $66.2M 2.5% | $66.3M 3.0% | $60.1M 5.0% | $23.4M 3.4% | $11.5M 2.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $163.1M 7.2% | $173.0M 6.4% | $136.3M 6.1% | $116.7M 9.7% | $38.2M 5.6% | $17.9M 3.2% |
| Interest Expense | $500K 0.0% | $4.1M 0.2% | $2.4M 0.1% | $2.0M 0.2% | $1.4M 0.2% | $128K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.4M 0.2% | $7.3M 0.3% | $7.0M 0.3% | -$4.6M -0.4% | -$270K -0.0% | $648K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$45.1M -2.0% | $39.6M 1.5% | -$100.3M -4.5% | -$287.8M -24.0% | -$160.2M -23.5% | -$40.3M -7.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $22.9M 1.0% | $9.2M 0.3% | $4.5M 0.2% | $1.4M 0.1% | $1.8M 0.3% | $6.4M 1.1% |
| Net Income | -$48.3M -2.1% | $22.7M 0.8% | -$69.6M -3.1% | -$268.9M -22.4% | -$162.0M -23.8% | -$46.7M -8.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.37 | $0.18 | $-0.60 | $-1.50 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.37 | $0.13 | $-0.60 | $-1.50 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 130.3M | 126.2M | 116.4M | 69.7M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 130.3M | 184.0M | 116.4M | 69.7M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$160M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $691M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 4-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 4-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 98.6 | 110.2 | 105.2 | 93.6 | 87.4 | 86.9 |
| Gross Profit | 1.4 | -10.2 | -5.2 | 6.4 | 12.6 | 13.1 |
| R&D | 2.1 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.8 |
| SG&A | 3.2 | 5.6 | 9.7 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 7.2 |
| Income Tax | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Net Income | -8.3 | -23.8 | -22.4 | -3.1 | 0.8 | -2.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FLNC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 95 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEV | $249.3B | 52.3× | 124.5× | 6.5× | 9.0% | 19.8% | 12.8% | 43.7% | 43.4% | 0.0× | 2,989 |
| NEE | $169.3B | 24.6× | — | 6.6× | 9.8% | — | 26.5% | 12.5% | 4.6% | — | 2,911 |
| SO | $95.7B | 22.1× | — | 3.2× | 10.6% | — | 14.7% | 12.1% | 11.8% | — | 2,268 |
| DUK | $92.2B | 18.8× | 10.7× | 2.9× | 5.6% | — | 15.7% | 9.6% | 3.7% | 5.1× | 2,360 |
| CEG | $82.0B | 35.5× | 21.5× | 3.2× | 8.3% | — | 9.1% | 16.0% | 9.9% | 2.2× | 1,836 |
| AEP | $65.8B | 18.3× | 12.9× | 3.0× | 10.9% | — | 16.9% | 11.9% | 4.8% | 5.3× | 1,854 |
| D | $56.5B | 18.6× | — | 3.4× | 14.2% | — | 18.2% | 10.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,421 |
| SRE | $53.6B | 29.9× | — | 3.9× | 3.9% | — | 13.4% | 5.8% | 5.1% | — | 1,217 |
| VST | $48.5B | 65.8× | 17.1× | 2.7× | 3.0% | — | 5.3% | 18.5% | 3.9% | 4.8× | 1,246 |
| XEL | $45.9B | 21.5× | — | — | — | — | — | 8.5% | 3.5% | — | 1,208 |
| ETR | $45.7B | 26.4× | 13.1× | 3.5× | 9.0% | — | 13.7% | 10.5% | 3.9% | 5.2× | 1,224 |
| EXC | $43.6B | — | 11.1× | 1.8× | 5.3% | — | 11.4% | 9.6% | 3.6% | 5.9× | 1,230 |
| ED | $38.7B | 19.0× | — | 2.3× | 10.9% | — | 12.0% | 8.4% | 4.0% | — | 1,368 |
| PEG | $35.3B | 16.8× | — | 2.9× | 18.3% | — | 17.3% | 12.4% | 5.3% | — | 1,231 |
| WEC | $34.1B | 21.8× | 14.6× | 3.5× | 14.0% | 66.7% | 15.9% | 11.1% | 4.5% | 5.5× | 1,310 |
| AEE | $28.7B | 19.4× | — | 3.3× | 15.4% | — | 16.6% | 10.9% | 4.5% | — | 884 |
| AWK | $27.0B | 24.3× | 10.3× | 5.3× | 10.1% | — | 21.7% | 10.3% | 8.9% | 0.6× | 1,100 |
| FE | $26.4B | 26.0× | 6.9× | 1.8× | 12.0% | — | 6.8% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 0.1× | 894 |
| ATO | $26.2B | 21.7× | 11.3× | 5.6× | 12.9% | — | 25.5% | 8.8% | 8.8% | — | 961 |
| ES | $25.9B | 15.1× | 10.0× | 1.9× | 13.8% | — | 12.5% | 10.5% | 3.8% | 5.2× | 1,012 |
| PPL | $25.2B | 21.1× | 12.4× | 2.8× | 6.9% | — | 13.1% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 5.4× | 947 |
| CNP | $25.2B | 24.1× | 12.7× | 2.7× | 8.3% | 100.0% | 11.2% | 9.4% | 3.3% | 5.8× | 774 |
| EIX | $21.4B | 4.8× | 5.8× | 1.1× | 9.8% | — | 23.1% | 25.4% | 8.0% | 3.7× | 1,005 |
| CMS | $20.3B | 18.8× | 12.7× | 2.4× | 13.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 3.8% | 6.2× | 762 |
| NRG | $20.2B | 26.5× | 9.8× | 0.7× | 9.2% | — | 2.8% | 51.4% | 4.8% | 5.1× | 1,010 |
| FLNC | $998M | — | — | 0.4× | -16.1% | 13.1% | -2.1% | -11.2% | -11.2% | — | 256 |
Peers = companies sharing FLNC's sector (Utilities) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.