Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.20% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$7M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 3 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 171%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 3 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2M covers all $79174 of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-03-31 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~5104.0% on $97161 of debt.
Cash of $2M fully covers short-term debt of $23743.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 16 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04 · 45d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $65.9M 100.0% | $3.2M 100.0% | $21.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $61.1M 92.8% | $3.1M 96.4% | $20.5M 94.9% |
| Gross Profit | $4.8M 7.2% | $116K 3.6% | $1.1M 5.1% |
| Research & Development | $2.1M 3.2% | $91K 2.8% | $272K 1.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $7.1M 10.7% | $2.1M 64.3% | $488K 2.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $14.5M 22.0% | $3.2M 100.5% | $1.0M 4.7% |
| Operating Income | -$9.7M -14.7% | -$3.1M -96.9% | $86K 0.4% |
| Interest Expense | $5.0M 7.5% | $278K 8.6% | $9K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $755K 1.1% | -$282K -8.7% | -$14K -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$8.9M -13.6% | -$3.4M -105.6% | $72K 0.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $77K 0.1% | $20K 0.6% | $14K 0.1% |
| Net Income | -$9.0M -13.7% | -$3.4M -106.3% | $58K 0.3% |
| Per Share | |||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.47 | $-1.04 | $0.06 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.47 | $-1.04 | $0.06 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 6.1M | 3.3M | 1.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 6.1M | 3.3M | 1.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 94.9 | 96.4 | 92.8 |
| Gross Profit | 5.1 | 3.6 | 7.2 |
| R&D | 1.3 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| SG&A | 2.3 | 64.3 | 10.7 |
| Operating Income | 0.4 | -96.9 | -14.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| Net Income | 0.3 | -106.3 | -13.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FOXXW: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.