Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 530 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.28B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $1.13B 100.0% | $1.07B 100.0% | $951.2M 100.0% | $835.5M 100.0% | $935.8M 100.0% | $915.4M 100.0% | $857.3M 100.0% | $801.6M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $46.9M 3.7% | $49.7M 4.1% | $50.7M 4.5% | $52.6M 4.9% | $49.9M 5.2% | $41.7M 5.0% | $42.8M 4.6% | $33.6M 3.7% | $36.3M 4.2% | $33.4M 4.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $833.6M 65.2% | $784.1M 65.2% | $735.6M 65.0% | $711.8M 66.3% | $646.4M 68.0% | $586.9M 70.2% | $581.3M 62.1% | $565.7M 61.8% | $525.1M 61.2% | $480.6M 60.0% |
| Operating Income | $602.2M 47.1% | $472.4M 39.3% | $406.5M 35.9% | $526.4M 49.0% | $394.7M 41.5% | $289.5M 34.7% | $470.9M 50.3% | $361.6M 39.5% | $410.2M 47.8% | $321.0M 40.0% |
| Interest Expense | $183.6M 14.4% | $175.5M 14.6% | $167.8M 14.8% | $137.0M 12.8% | $127.7M 13.4% | $136.3M 16.3% | $109.6M 11.7% | $110.2M 12.0% | $100.1M 11.7% | $95.0M 11.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $3.1M 0.2% | $4.3M 0.4% | $4.7M 0.4% | $1.1M 0.1% | $809K 0.1% | $1.9M 0.2% | $1.3M 0.1% | $942K 0.1% | $475K 0.1% | $374K 0.0% |
| Net Income | $411.1M 32.1% | $295.2M 24.6% | $237.0M 20.9% | $385.5M 35.9% | $261.5M 27.5% | $131.7M 15.8% | $353.9M 37.8% | $241.9M 26.4% | $289.9M 33.8% | $249.9M 31.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.68 | $3.42 | $2.80 | $4.71 | $3.26 | $1.62 | $4.61 | $3.18 | $3.97 | $3.51 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.68 | $3.42 | $2.80 | $4.71 | $3.26 | $1.62 | $4.61 | $3.18 | $3.97 | $3.50 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 85.9M | 83.6M | 81.3M | 79.9M | 77.3M | 75.5M | 74.8M | 73.3M | 72.1M | 70.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 86.4M | 83.6M | 81.3M | 80.5M | 77.4M | 75.5M | 74.8M | 73.3M | 72.2M | 71.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $107M is below the $656M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~3.7% on $5.0B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 240 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $163.3B | 168.7× | — | 15.1× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 1.6% | — | 1,425 |
| XHG | $130.7B | — | — | 2546.6× | 24.9% | 2.2% | -205% | 85.0% | 88.3% | — | 1 |
| PLD | $124.3B | 37.6× | — | 14.1× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 1,592 |
| EQIX | $99.8B | 73.8× | 25.5× | 10.8× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 0.3× | 1,229 |
| AMT | $82.3B | 32.7× | 14.2× | 7.7× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 37.3% | 0.6× | 1,662 |
| SPG | $66.2B | 14.3× | — | 10.4× | 6.7% | — | 84.3% | 103% | 15.9% | — | 1,242 |
| O | $53.4B | 48.9× | — | 9.3× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| PSA | $51.7B | 32.7× | — | 10.7× | 2.7% | — | 37.0% | 19.3% | 9.1% | — | 1,045 |
| VTR | $41.9B | 163.3× | — | 7.2× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| CBRE | $41.0B | 36.0× | — | 1.0× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| IRM | $33.2B | 228.9× | 22.6× | 4.8× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.5× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $28.8B | 29.7× | 13.5× | 8.5× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| VICI | $26.2B | 9.4× | — | 6.5× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| SBAC | $19.0B | 18.4× | 21.5× | 6.8× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 13.1% | 8.7× | 636 |
| BEKE | $17.6B | 133.1× | 37.9× | 1.3× | 5.6% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 197 |
| ESS | $17.5B | 26.1× | 11.6× | 9.3× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| INVH | $16.6B | 28.3× | — | 6.1× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| JLL | $16.0B | 20.7× | 11.9× | 0.6× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 10.4% | 0.1× | 615 |
| WY | $15.7B | 48.5× | 16.8× | 2.3× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.5× | 868 |
| KIM | $15.2B | — | 16.3× | 7.1× | 5.1% | — | 27.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | 5.5× | 633 |
| NLY | $15.0B | 7.3× | — | — | — | — | — | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 743 |
| LAMR | $15.0B | 25.6× | — | 6.6× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 13.2% | — | 655 |
| HST | $15.0B | 19.8× | — | 2.5× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| FRT | $9.7B | 24.0× | — | 7.6× | 6.4% | — | 32.1% | 12.7% | 5.0% | — | 530 |
Peers = companies sharing FRT's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 45th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 4.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 3.7 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 3.7 |
| Operating Income | 39.5 | 50.3 | 34.7 | 41.5 | 49.0 | 35.9 | 39.3 | 47.1 |
| Net Income | 26.4 | 37.8 | 15.8 | 27.5 | 35.9 | 20.9 | 24.6 | 32.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FRT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.