Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.19% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $682.5B | 24.4× | — | 2.0× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $544.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $391.1B | 31.9× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $200.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $165.9B | 20.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $155.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $126.2B | 31.3× | 10.8× | 0.9× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $124.6B | 53.3× | 23.6× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $116.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| EQNR | $110.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| PSX | $107.4B | 24.5× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| WMB | $86.6B | 33.1× | 17.6× | 7.2× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $83.3B | — | 12.5× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $78.7B | 15.9× | 7.7× | 3.5× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $78.2B | 22.3× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $72.7B | — | 9.8× | 0.8× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $68.4B | 22.4× | 14.0× | 4.0× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.1B | 33.5× | 16.2× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| TS | $60.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| LNG | $58.8B | 11.1× | 7.7× | 2.9× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| MPLX | $58.7B | — | — | 4.5× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| OXY | $58.5B | 36.9× | — | 2.7× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| OKE | $58.4B | 17.1× | 12.4× | 1.7× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| BKR | $55.9B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| FANG | $55.4B | 34.0× | 11.1× | 3.7× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| FTCI | $33M | — | — | 0.3× | 111% | -0.9% | -79.8% | 185% | 391% | -0.7× | 39 |
Peers = companies sharing FTCI's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $99.7M 100.0% | $47.4M 100.0% | $127.0M 100.0% | $123.1M 100.0% | $270.5M 100.0% | $187.4M 100.0% | $53.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $100.6M 100.9% | $59.9M 126.6% | $118.7M 93.5% | $150.3M 122.1% | $303.1M 112.0% | $183.7M 98.1% | $55.1M 103.7% |
| Gross Profit | -$880K -0.9% | -$12.6M -26.6% | $8.3M 6.5% | -$27.2M -22.1% | -$32.5M -12.0% | $3.6M 1.9% | -$2.0M -3.7% |
| Research & Development | $4.4M 4.4% | $5.9M 12.5% | $7.2M 5.6% | $9.9M 8.1% | $11.5M 4.3% | $5.2M 2.8% | $4.0M 7.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $24.0M 24.0% | $25.4M 53.7% | $37.1M 29.2% | $53.7M 43.7% | $75.9M 28.1% | $11.8M 6.3% | $4.6M 8.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $34.5M 34.7% | $40.2M 85.0% | $59.1M 46.5% | $72.3M 58.8% | $94.3M 34.8% | $20.6M 11.0% | $10.4M 19.6% |
| Operating Income | -$35.4M -35.5% | -$52.8M -111.6% | -$50.8M -40.0% | -$99.6M -80.9% | -$126.8M -46.9% | -$16.9M -9.0% | -$12.4M -23.3% |
| Interest Expense | $8.2M 8.2% | $665K 1.4% | -$1.3M -1.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $140K 0.1% | $468K 1.0% | -$257K -0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$79.1M -79.3% | -$48.4M -102.2% | -$50.6M -39.9% | -$99.2M -80.6% | -$106.4M -39.3% | -$16.0M -8.5% | -$13.5M -25.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $525K 0.5% | $230K 0.5% | -$338K -0.3% | $435K 0.4% | $169K 0.1% | -$83K -0.0% | -$39K -0.1% |
| Net Income | -$79.6M -79.8% | -$48.6M -102.6% | -$50.3M -39.6% | -$99.6M -80.9% | -$106.6M -39.4% | -$15.9M -8.5% | -$13.5M -25.4% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-5.68 | $-3.83 | $-4.35 | $-0.98 | $-1.24 | $-0.23 | $-0.22 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-5.68 | $-3.83 | $-4.35 | $-0.98 | $-1.24 | $-0.23 | $-0.22 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 14.0M | 12.7M | 11.6M | 101.4M | 86.0M | 68.8M | 62.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 14.0M | 12.7M | 11.6M | 101.4M | 86.0M | 68.8M | 62.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$35M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 391%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~36.3% on $23M of debt.
Cash of $21M fully covers short-term debt of $13M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 103.7 | 98.1 | 112.0 | 122.1 | 93.5 | 126.6 | 100.9 |
| Gross Profit | -3.7 | 1.9 | -12.0 | -22.1 | 6.5 | -26.6 | -0.9 |
| R&D | 7.5 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 8.1 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 4.4 |
| SG&A | 8.6 | 6.3 | 28.1 | 43.7 | 29.2 | 53.7 | 24.0 |
| Operating Income | -23.3 | -9.0 | -46.9 | -80.9 | -40.0 | -111.6 | -35.5 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | -0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | -25.4 | -8.5 | -39.4 | -80.9 | -39.6 | -102.6 | -79.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on FTCI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.