Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 165 of 5,944 reporting institutions (90th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $634.9M 100.0% | $666.8M 100.0% | $1.05B 100.0% | $1.12B 100.0% | $1.10B 100.0% | $694.2M 100.0% | $973.4M 100.0% | $851.8M 100.0% | $507.1M 100.0% | $400.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $45.9M 7.2% | $46.3M 6.9% | $46.5M 4.4% | $46.6M 4.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $218.5M 34.4% | $225.3M 33.8% | $255.6M 24.3% | $235.4M 21.0% | $222.0M 20.2% | $183.1M 26.4% | $229.3M 23.6% | $183.9M 21.6% | $98.4M 19.4% | $66.3M 16.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $188.7M 29.7% | $199.5M 29.9% | $200.8M 19.1% | $183.1M 16.3% | $930.5M 84.9% | $761.6M 109.7% | $927.3M 95.3% | $800.8M 94.0% | $491.8M 97.0% | $387.0M 96.7% |
| Operating Income | $21.5M 3.4% | $112.1M 16.8% | $399.2M 37.9% | $147.9M 13.2% | $166.0M 15.1% | -$67.4M -9.7% | $46.1M 4.7% | $51.0M 6.0% | $15.3M 3.0% | $13.0M 3.3% |
| Interest Expense | $1.6M 0.3% | $2.2M 0.3% | $4.1M 0.4% | $4.1M 0.4% | $4.3M 0.4% | $4.5M 0.6% | $4.5M 0.5% | $5.1M 0.6% | $1.6M 0.3% | $700 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$30.7M -4.8% | -$39.3M -5.9% | -$67.2M -6.4% | -$65.1M -5.8% | -$3.8M -0.3% | -$69.1M -10.0% | -$87.5M -9.0% | -$62.2M -7.3% | -$21.1M -4.2% | -$1.1M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | -$9.1M -1.4% | $72.8M 10.9% | $332.0M 31.5% | $82.9M 7.4% | $162.2M 14.8% | -$136.6M -19.7% | -$41.4M -4.3% | -$11.3M -1.3% | -$5.8M -1.2% | $12.0M 3.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$3.1M -0.5% | $22.1M 3.3% | $76.2M 7.2% | $521K 0.0% | $436K 0.0% | $61K 0.0% | -$1.9M -0.2% | $9.6M 1.1% | -$7.9M -1.6% | -$4.3M -1.1% |
| Net Income | -$6.0M -1.0% | $50.7M 7.6% | $255.8M 24.3% | $82.3M 7.3% | $161.8M 14.8% | -$136.6M -19.7% | -$39.5M -4.1% | -$20.9M -2.5% | $2.1M 0.4% | $16.3M 4.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.23 | $1.80 | $8.93 | $2.87 | $5.64 | $-4.87 | $-1.43 | $-0.76 | $0.09 | $0.74 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.23 | $1.71 | $8.31 | $2.61 | $5.04 | $-4.87 | $-1.43 | $-0.76 | $0.08 | $0.73 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 26.3M | 28.2M | 28.7M | 28.7M | 28.7M | 28.1M | 27.7M | 27.6M | 23.1M | 22.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 26.3M | 29.7M | 30.8M | 31.5M | 32.1M | 28.1M | 27.7M | 27.6M | 24.7M | 22.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend takes 74% of free cash flow — sustainable but with limited headroom. Last year: $26M dividends + $22M buybacks = $49M returned on $36M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · -1%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: -1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $55M covers the $6M due within a year 8.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 16.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | 4.2 | 4.4 | 6.9 | 7.2 |
| SG&A | 21.6 | 23.6 | 26.4 | 20.2 | 21.0 | 24.3 | 33.8 | 34.4 |
| Operating Income | 6.0 | 4.7 | -9.7 | 15.1 | 13.2 | 37.9 | 16.8 | 3.4 |
| Income Tax | 1.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.2 | 3.3 | -0.5 |
| Net Income | -2.5 | -4.1 | -19.7 | 14.8 | 7.3 | 24.3 | 7.6 | -1.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on GDEN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.70T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.37T | 339.1× | 145.5× | 14.5× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $614.2B | 60.0× | 24.8× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $442.6B | 32.9× | 31.9× | 7.2× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $201.7B | 135.7× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $140.1B | 26.0× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.7B | 187.9× | 114.3× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $109.9B | 59.3× | 26.8× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $101.7B | — | 37.9× | 8.3× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $92.5B | 46.3× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $88.8B | 35.1× | 20.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $86.3B | 168.2× | 90.8× | 12.3× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.3B | 26.5× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.0B | 34.7× | 22.0× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $71.5B | 28.6× | 19.5× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $69.7B | 49.4× | 24.0× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $67.7B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $62.0B | 40.2× | 24.6× | 2.7× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $54.2B | — | 4.5× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.9B | 17.3× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $50.7B | 26.0× | 18.4× | 4.6× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.6× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $44.8B | 29.4× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| GDEN | — | — | — | — | -4.8% | 92.8% | -1.0% | -1.4% | -1.4% | — | 165 |
Peers = companies sharing GDEN's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.