Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.16% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $31.12 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -5.0%/yr for a decade (off $53M normalized FCF).
The market's -5.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt $3M
mean -88.2% · volatility σ 64% · implied rate exceeded in 0/5 yrs
Central path = implied -5.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (64%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 58% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $6M dividends + $9M buybacks = $15M returned on $11M FCF.
7 consecutive years of dividend increases · -19%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~1.4% on $50M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $606.9M 100.0% | $654.7M 100.0% | $625.6M 100.0% | $640.9M 100.0% | $658.4M 100.0% | $603.7M 100.0% | $611.8M 100.0% | $743.2M 100.0% | $740.7M 100.0% | $745.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $450.7M 74.3% | $484.5M 74.0% | $481.9M 77.0% | $511.8M 79.9% | $521.9M 79.3% | $465.1M 77.0% | $483.2M 79.0% | $491.0M 66.1% | $475.9M 64.3% | $551.6M 74.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $546.9M 73.8% | $551.6M 74.0% |
| Gross Profit | $156.2M 25.7% | $170.2M 26.0% | $143.7M 23.0% | $129.1M 20.1% | $136.5M 20.7% | $138.7M 23.0% | $128.6M 21.0% | $139.1M 18.7% | $136.1M 18.4% | $193.8M 26.0% |
| Research & Development | $13.2M 2.2% | $13.7M 2.1% | $12.4M 2.0% | $11.8M 1.8% | $8.6M 1.3% | $10.0M 1.7% | $12.1M 2.0% | $11.0M 1.5% | $10.4M 1.4% | $9.7M 1.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $119.3M 19.7% | $126.7M 19.4% | $108.4M 17.3% | $90.1M 14.1% | $104.8M 15.9% | $100.0M 16.6% | $100.4M 16.4% | $104.1M 14.0% | $96.8M 13.1% | $149.0M 20.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $155.7M 21.0% | $150.4M 20.2% |
| Operating Income | $36.6M 6.0% | $43.2M 6.6% | $35.1M 5.6% | $38.8M 6.1% | $31.5M 4.8% | $37.4M 6.2% | $26.8M 4.4% | $33.5M 4.5% | $38.0M 5.1% | $43.4M 5.8% |
| Interest Expense | $703K 0.1% | $613K 0.1% | $3.0M 0.5% | $4.6M 0.7% | $2.9M 0.4% | $2.0M 0.3% | $3.0M 0.5% | $2.9M 0.4% | $1.6M 0.2% | $1.4M 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$235K -0.0% | -$1.6M -0.2% | -$385K -0.1% | -$1.8M -0.3% | $272K 0.0% | -$1.7M -0.3% | $358K 0.1% | -$149K -0.0% | -$2.1M -0.3% | -$2.2M -0.3% |
| Pretax Income | $35.6M 5.9% | $33.4M 5.1% | $31.7M 5.1% | $32.4M 5.1% | $29.0M 4.4% | $33.7M 5.6% | $24.2M 4.0% | $30.5M 4.1% | $37.1M 5.0% | $41.2M 5.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $9.2M 1.5% | $2.6M 0.4% | $6.5M 1.0% | $7.2M 1.1% | $7.7M 1.2% | $9.7M 1.6% | $9.1M 1.5% | $7.4M 1.0% | $19.0M 2.6% | $15.0M 2.0% |
| Net Income | $26.5M 4.4% | $30.8M 4.7% | $25.2M 4.0% | $25.3M 3.9% | $21.3M 3.2% | $46.3M 7.7% | -$13.5M -2.2% | $17.7M 2.4% | $15.9M 2.1% | $26.2M 3.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.95 | $2.20 | $1.80 | $1.81 | $1.54 | $3.39 | $-0.99 | $1.29 | $1.31 | $1.91 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.95 | $2.20 | $1.80 | $1.81 | $1.53 | $3.37 | $-0.99 | $1.29 | $1.31 | $1.91 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 13.6M | 13.9M | 14.0M | 14.0M | 13.9M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 13.6M | 14.0M | 14.1M | 14.0M | 13.9M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M | 13.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| HBB | $416M | 15.8× | 9.9× | 0.7× | -7.3% | 25.7% | 4.4% | 14.5% | 11.4% | 1.2× | 71 |
Peers = companies sharing HBB's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 89th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 66.1 | 79.0 | 77.0 | 79.3 | 79.9 | 77.0 | 74.0 | 74.3 |
| Gross Profit | 18.7 | 21.0 | 23.0 | 20.7 | 20.1 | 23.0 | 26.0 | 25.7 |
| R&D | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| SG&A | 14.0 | 16.4 | 16.6 | 15.9 | 14.1 | 17.3 | 19.4 | 19.7 |
| Operating Income | 4.5 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 6.6 | 6.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
| Net Income | 2.4 | -2.2 | 7.7 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HBB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.