Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +5.70% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $10.38 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.8%/yr for a decade (off $36M normalized FCF).
The market's -2.8% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt $58M
mean 6.0% · volatility σ 34% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied -2.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (34%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 40% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $13M dividends + $69M buybacks = $82M returned on $32M FCF.
1 consecutive years of dividend increases · 8%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $18M covers the $3M due within a year 6.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-28 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2.3% on $76M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $305.6M 100.0% | $313.9M 100.0% | $296.6M 100.0% | $293.7M 100.0% | $278.8M 100.0% | $239.5M 100.0% | $282.5M 100.0% | $285.9M 100.0% | $285.9M 100.0% | $288.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $188.5M 61.7% | $190.6M 60.7% | $180.2M 60.8% | $178.2M 60.7% | $173.1M 62.1% | $166.4M 69.5% | $185.7M 65.7% | $186.3M 65.2% | $188.9M 66.1% | $191.9M 66.5% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $166.3M 58.2% | $163.3M 56.6% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | $84.4M 28.4% | $89.5M 30.5% | $83.8M 30.1% | $52.4M 21.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $90.5M 29.6% | $78.5M 25.0% | $65.9M 22.2% | $61.0M 20.8% | $59.2M 21.2% | $54.0M 22.5% | $62.1M 22.0% | $64.1M 22.4% | $63.3M 22.1% | $60.1M 20.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $282.1M 92.3% | $269.3M 85.8% | $247.3M 83.4% | $238.5M 81.2% | $232.3M 83.3% | $230.8M 96.4% | $251.1M 88.9% | $252.3M 88.3% | $247.9M 86.7% | $246.3M 85.3% |
| Operating Income | $23.5M 7.7% | $44.6M 14.2% | $49.3M 16.6% | $55.2M 18.8% | $46.5M 16.7% | $8.6M 3.6% | $31.3M 11.1% | $33.6M 11.7% | $28.7M 10.0% | $33.5M 11.6% |
| Interest Expense | $1.7M 0.6% | $1.6M 0.5% | $3.2M 1.1% | $144K 0.0% | $95K 0.0% | $126K 0.1% | $311K 0.1% | $638K 0.2% | $584K 0.2% | $387K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $21.8M 7.1% | $43.0M 13.7% | $46.0M 15.5% | $55.1M 18.8% | $46.4M 16.6% | $8.5M 3.6% | $31.0M 11.0% | $32.9M 11.5% | $28.1M 9.8% | $33.1M 11.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.9M 2.9% | $13.4M 4.3% | $11.9M 4.0% | $14.3M 4.9% | $4.8M 1.7% | $2.9M 1.2% | $7.7M 2.7% | $5.6M 2.0% | $2.6M 0.9% | $12.5M 4.3% |
| Net Income | $12.9M 4.2% | $29.6M 9.4% | $34.2M 11.5% | $40.8M 13.9% | $41.5M 14.9% | $5.5M 2.3% | $23.3M 8.2% | $23.9M 8.4% | $27.4M 9.6% | $21.5M 7.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.47 | $1.08 | $1.26 | $1.30 | $1.38 | $0.18 | $0.78 | $0.81 | $0.95 | $0.74 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.46 | $1.05 | $1.24 | $1.28 | $1.26 | $0.17 | $0.72 | $0.74 | $0.85 | $0.66 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 27.3M | 27.6M | 27.2M | 31.4M | 30.0M | 30.0M | 29.8M | 29.4M | 28.9M | 29.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 27.9M | 28.1M | 27.6M | 32.0M | 32.9M | 32.4M | 32.5M | 32.3M | 32.2M | 32.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-18
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 18.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.2 | 65.7 | 69.5 | 62.1 | 60.7 | 60.8 | 60.7 | 61.7 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | 21.9 | 30.1 | 30.5 | 28.4 | — | — |
| SG&A | 22.4 | 22.0 | 22.5 | 21.2 | 20.8 | 22.2 | 25.0 | 29.6 |
| Operating Income | 11.7 | 11.1 | 3.6 | 16.7 | 18.8 | 16.6 | 14.2 | 7.7 |
| Income Tax | 2.0 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 2.9 |
| Net Income | 8.4 | 8.2 | 2.3 | 14.9 | 13.9 | 11.5 | 9.4 | 4.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HCKT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 743 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | $11.27T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,121 |
| NVDA | $5.40T | 45.4× | 40.5× | 25.0× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.97T | 45.1× | 34.7× | 11.9× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 68.1% | 0.6× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.67T | 27.5× | 19.4× | 11.1× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 27.7% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.70T | 75.0× | 66.9× | 26.5× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.14T | 133.8× | 63.0× | 30.5× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $912.5B | 211.3× | 215.9× | 26.3× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| INTC | $542.3B | — | 67.3× | 10.3× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $433.7B | 43.0× | 36.4× | 7.7× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| PLTR | $424.8B | 282.0× | 294.0× | 94.9× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| DELL | $370.4B | 65.4× | 34.9× | 3.3× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| LRCX | $365.5B | 69.4× | 58.4× | 19.8× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 37.4% | 0.7× | 2,500 |
| AMAT | $352.5B | 51.3× | 40.5× | 12.4× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| RPAY | $340.5B | — | — | 1101.1× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -28.2% | -1.7× | 142 |
| UMC | $309.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| ARM | $293.3B | 324.3× | 252.8× | 59.6× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| SNDK | $261.6B | — | — | 35.6× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.8% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SAP | $257.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 794 |
| ANET | $250.5B | 72.5× | 63.3× | 27.8× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 39.0% | 28.4% | 28.4% | — | 1,930 |
| PANW | $242.9B | 227.2× | 151.7× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| TXN | $242.4B | 48.9× | 31.9× | 13.7× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.5% | 1.8× | 2,345 |
| CRM | $221.0B | 30.5× | 23.9× | 5.3× | 9.6% | 77.7% | 18.0% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 1.5× | 2,547 |
| IBM | $215.1B | 20.6× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| MRVL | $207.0B | 79.6× | 135.2× | 25.3× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
| QCOM | $190.9B | 35.5× | 14.3× | 4.3× | 13.7% | 55.4% | 12.5% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 1.1× | 2,611 |
| HCKT | $283M | 22.6× | 11.9× | 0.9× | -2.6% | 38.3% | 4.2% | 19.0% | 9.0% | 2.6× | 162 |
Peers = companies sharing HCKT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.