Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 467 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $44.81 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -3.3%/yr for a decade (off $671M normalized FCF).
The market's -3.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares (market data) · net debt $533M
mean 219.2% · volatility σ 670% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied -3.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (670%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 28% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $211M dividends + $0 buybacks = $211M returned on $756M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 46%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $959M covers the $1M due within a year 958.7× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2018-04-30 (8-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.4% on $1.5B of debt.
Cash of $959M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 20th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2027 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 56.8 | 64.9 | 54.0 | 54.3 | 55.4 | 55.2 | 55.5 | 55.7 |
| SG&A | 23.3 | 28.2 | 23.5 | 24.2 | 23.0 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 21.3 |
| Income Tax | 3.2 | -0.4 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 3.0 |
| Net Income | 13.7 | -0.3 | 17.1 | 16.0 | 15.9 | 16.5 | 16.1 | 18.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HRB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2027
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2027 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.95B 100.0% | $3.76B 100.0% | $3.61B 100.0% | $3.47B 100.0% | $3.46B 100.0% | $3.41B 100.0% | $2.64B 100.0% | $3.09B 100.0% | $3.16B 100.0% | $3.04B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.20B 55.7% | $2.09B 55.5% | $1.99B 55.2% | $1.92B 55.4% | $1.88B 54.3% | $1.84B 54.0% | $1.71B 64.9% | $1.76B 56.8% | $1.74B 55.1% | $1.64B 54.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $841.3M 21.3% | $846.9M 22.5% | $813.5M 22.5% | $800.0M 23.0% | $837.1M 24.2% | $802.3M 23.5% | $744.4M 28.2% | $722.2M 23.3% | $668.2M 21.1% | $676.0M 22.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $3.04B 77.0% | $2.93B 78.0% | $2.81B 77.7% | $2.72B 78.4% | $2.72B 78.5% | $2.64B 77.5% | $2.56B 97.1% | $2.48B 80.1% | $2.41B 76.2% | $2.32B 76.4% |
| Interest Expense | $80.6M 2.0% | $78.1M 2.1% | $79.1M 2.2% | $73.0M 2.1% | $88.3M 2.5% | $106.9M 3.1% | $96.1M 3.6% | $87.1M 2.8% | $89.4M 2.8% | $93.0M 3.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14.3M 0.5% | $16.5M 0.5% | $6.9M 0.2% | $3.8M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $26.8M 0.7% | $31.5M 0.8% | $36.1M 1.0% | $35.5M 1.0% | $2.5M 0.1% | $6.0M 0.2% | $15.6M 0.6% | $16.4M 0.5% | $6.1M 0.2% | $6.3M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $853.9M 21.6% | $781.4M 20.8% | $762.3M 21.1% | $711.2M 20.5% | $659.1M 19.0% | $762.3M 22.3% | -$3.4M -0.1% | $545.2M 17.6% | $668.7M 21.2% | $629.3M 20.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $117.6M 3.0% | $172.0M 4.6% | $164.4M 4.6% | $149.4M 4.3% | $98.4M 2.8% | $164.4M 4.8% | -$9.5M -0.4% | $99.9M 3.2% | $41.8M 1.3% | $208.4M 6.9% |
| Net Income | $733.6M 18.6% | $605.8M 16.1% | $595.3M 16.5% | $553.7M 15.9% | $553.7M 16.0% | $583.8M 17.1% | -$7.5M -0.3% | $422.5M 13.7% | $613.1M 19.4% | $408.9M 13.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $5.72 | $4.45 | $4.18 | $3.58 | $3.27 | $3.11 | $-0.04 | $2.05 | $2.93 | $1.92 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.66 | $4.39 | $4.12 | $3.51 | $3.22 | $3.08 | $-0.04 | $2.04 | $2.91 | $1.91 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 127.6M | 135.6M | 141.9M | 154.0M | 168.5M | 186.8M | 196.7M | 205.4M | 208.8M | 212.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 128.9M | 137.3M | 143.9M | 157.2M | 171.4M | 188.8M | 198.1M | 206.7M | 210.2M | 214.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.65T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.34T | 331.6× | 142.2× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $608.8B | 59.5× | 24.6× | 2.6× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $448.4B | 33.4× | 32.3× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $301.3B | 21.3× | 14.3× | 1.8× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $199.3B | 134.1× | — | 1.3× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $136.0B | 25.2× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $131.2B | 185.7× | 113.0× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $110.7B | 59.7× | 26.9× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $108.9B | 16.4× | 12.0× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $102.7B | — | 38.3× | 8.4× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $93.3B | 46.7× | — | 3.2× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $89.1B | 35.2× | 20.7× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $87.3B | 170.2× | 91.9× | 12.4× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $76.2B | 25.8× | 3.7× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $72.5B | 34.0× | 21.6× | 3.2× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $70.5B | 28.2× | 19.2× | 4.0× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $70.4B | 49.9× | 24.2× | 5.8× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $68.8B | 16.3× | — | 3.8× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $63.4B | 41.1× | 25.1× | 2.8× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $53.1B | — | 4.4× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $53.1B | 17.0× | — | 1.1× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| EBAY | $49.0B | 25.1× | 17.8× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| AZO | $47.8B | 19.7× | 13.3× | 2.5× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $45.0B | 29.5× | 19.4× | 3.8× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| HRB | $5.6B | 8.0× | — | 1.4× | 4.9% | 44.3% | 18.6% | 624% | 45.6% | — | 467 |
Peers = companies sharing HRB's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.