Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.31% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 838 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM | $940.8B | 17.4× | — | 5.2× | 2.8% | — | 31.3% | 15.7% | 13.4% | — | 4,823 |
| V | $692.5B | — | — | 17.3× | 11.3% | — | 50.1% | 52.9% | 31.8% | — | 4,229 |
| MA | $513.8B | 34.4× | — | 15.7× | 16.4% | — | 45.6% | 193% | 56.0% | — | 3,430 |
| BAC | $417.6B | 15.2× | — | 3.7× | 6.8% | — | 27.0% | 10.1% | 4.9% | — | 3,337 |
| GS | $278.1B | 18.3× | — | — | — | — | — | 13.7% | 3.6% | — | 2,857 |
| WFC | $269.2B | 13.9× | — | — | — | — | — | 11.8% | 5.7% | — | 2,691 |
| AXP | $214.3B | 20.3× | — | 5.2× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 2,787 |
| TYFG | $191.9B | 14.2× | — | 11135.5× | 10.2% | — | 79.3% | 8.7% | 8.7% | — | 1 |
| SCHW | $189.7B | 22.6× | — | 7.9× | 22.0% | — | 37.0% | 17.9% | 17.9% | — | 2,225 |
| HDB | $171.3B | 21.5× | — | 6.7× | 15.2% | — | 30.8% | 8.8% | 4.5% | — | 570 |
| UBS | $168.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 660 |
| BLK | $160.8B | 29.4× | — | 6.6× | 89.3% | — | 22.9% | 9.9% | 8.1% | — | 2,196 |
| CB | $133.6B | 13.3× | — | 2.3× | 6.5% | — | 17.4% | 14.0% | 11.3% | — | 2,002 |
| GLD | $132.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,072 |
| PGR | $127.2B | 11.3× | — | 1.4× | 16.3% | — | 12.9% | 37.3% | 37.3% | — | 1,685 |
| SPGI | $121.5B | 27.8× | 17.4× | 7.9× | 7.9% | 70.2% | 29.2% | 14.4% | 10.1% | 1.7× | 2,005 |
| CME | $98.0B | 24.4× | — | 15.0× | 6.4% | — | 62.5% | 14.2% | 14.2% | — | 1,699 |
| USB | $95.6B | 12.9× | — | 3.3× | 4.4% | — | 26.4% | 11.6% | 9.2% | — | 1,901 |
| HOOD | $92.8B | 50.9× | — | 20.7× | 51.6% | — | 42.1% | 20.6% | 20.6% | — | 1,230 |
| BX | $92.4B | 31.9× | — | 6.4× | 9.2% | — | 20.9% | 34.8% | 14.2% | — | 2,037 |
| PNC | $91.7B | 13.9× | — | 4.0× | 7.2% | — | 30.3% | 11.5% | 5.9% | — | 1,839 |
| AMUB | $88.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| ICE | $87.4B | 26.7× | 20.7× | 6.9× | 7.5% | — | 26.2% | 11.5% | 6.8% | 3.8× | 1,641 |
| KKR | $86.3B | — | — | 4.4× | -11.0% | — | 12.2% | 7.7% | 7.7% | — | 1,216 |
| MRSH | $85.7B | 21.0× | 15.6× | 3.2× | 10.3% | — | 15.4% | 27.2% | 11.9% | 3.0× | 1,471 |
| HTT | $384M | — | — | 65.5× | -80.2% | 7.1% | 1730% | 6.1% | 5.4% | -4.5× | 44 |
Peers = companies sharing HTT's sector (Financial Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for HTT: its net cash ($566M) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
2-stage DCF · 0.16B shares (market data) · net debt -$566M
mean -42.6% · volatility σ 76% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (76%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.9M 100.0% | $216.4M 100.0% | $126.3M 100.0% | $577.5M 100.0% | $1.65B 100.0% | $3.69B 100.0% | $8.84B 100.0% | $7.69B 100.0% | $4.78B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $5.4M 92.9% | $201.0M 92.9% | $160.1M 126.7% | $383.1M 66.3% | $298.7M 18.1% | $862.4M 23.4% | $901.8M 10.2% | $2.74B 35.6% | $880.8M 18.4% |
| Research & Development | $6.5M 111.6% | $58.5M 27.0% | $47.8M 37.8% | $58.3M 10.1% | $141.3M 8.5% | $170.7M 4.6% | $204.8M 2.3% | $199.6M 2.6% | $153.3M 3.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $41.7M 711.6% | $276.6M 127.8% | $273.6M 216.6% | $287.5M 49.8% | $443.3M 26.8% | $285.9M 7.8% | $286.1M 3.2% | $255.9M 3.3% | $183.7M 3.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $57.4M 980.6% | $323.9M 149.6% | $355.6M 281.5% | $561.2M 97.2% | $514.9M 31.1% | $2.30B 62.5% | $4.20B 47.5% | $2.29B 29.8% | $1.52B 31.9% |
| Operating Income | -$57.0M -972.6% | -$308.1M -142.4% | -$331.0M -262.0% | -$329.5M -57.1% | $922.7M 55.8% | $865.6M 23.5% | $3.85B 43.5% | $2.69B 35.0% | $2.42B 50.7% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $15.9M 272.2% | $145.6M 67.3% | $110.7M 87.7% | $54.8M 9.5% | $27.6M 1.7% | $27.4M 0.7% | $27.4M 0.3% | $35.8M 0.5% | $21.4M 0.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | $54.4M 1.5% | $41.8M 0.5% | -$40.3M -0.5% | -$1.2M -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $105.7M 1804.8% | $157.5M 72.8% | $101.5M 80.3% | -$269.6M -46.7% | $846.4M 51.2% | $1.22B 33.1% | $3.89B 44.0% | $2.65B 34.4% | $2.42B 50.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.4M 74.9% | $65.8M 30.4% | $62.3M 49.3% | $92.4M 16.0% | $260.5M 15.7% | $262.0M 7.1% | $626.2M 7.1% | $157.7M 2.1% | $255.5M 5.4% |
| Net Income | $101.3M 1729.9% | $91.7M 42.4% | $39.1M 31.0% | -$362.0M -62.7% | $589.1M 35.6% | $958.8M 26.0% | $3.26B 36.9% | $2.49B 32.4% | $2.16B 45.3% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7.82 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7.74 | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $43M buybacks = $43M returned on $82M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $791M fully covers short-term debt of $225M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-17
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 35.6 | 10.2 | 23.4 | 18.1 | 66.3 | 126.7 | 92.9 | 92.9 |
| R&D | 2.6 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 8.5 | 10.1 | 37.8 | 27.0 | 111.6 |
| SG&A | 3.3 | 3.2 | 7.8 | 26.8 | 49.8 | 216.6 | 127.8 | 711.6 |
| Operating Income | 35.0 | 43.5 | 23.5 | 55.8 | -57.1 | -262.0 | -142.4 | -972.6 |
| Income Tax | 2.1 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 15.7 | 16.0 | 49.3 | 30.4 | 74.9 |
| Net Income | 32.4 | 36.9 | 26.0 | 35.6 | -62.7 | 31.0 | 42.4 | 1729.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HTT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.